Title:  ELECTION 2002, AN ANALYSIS EXAMINING THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING THE WORLD TODAY -- THE SUCCESSFUL STAGING OF ANTICHRIST
Resources to aid your Understanding

 

 

Subtitle: While other analysts have examined this mid-term election from many types of angles, we want to examine the election from the most important angle of all: how this election affects President Bush's leadership in the gradual drive to stage Antichrist.

The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!

Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!

Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.

YOU ARE NOW ON

THE CUTTING EDGE

Since 1870, the Illuminati has been planning that the Third World War would be the final war needed to stage Antichrist. As we demonstrate in Seminar 2, "America Controls The Flow Of History", this final world war would begin in the Middle East between Israel and her Arab neighbors and expand out to include other major parts of the world. Through the devastation of this war would stride Antichrist.

Since the early 1950's, the trigger to start this World War III has been planned to be a U.S. attack on Iraq. Since the news today is daily filled with numerous stories on the impending attack on Iraq by foreign forces led by the United States, and since so many other End of the Age prophecies are coming true at the same time, we have to conclude that our invasion of Iraq may very well be the "trigger" to begin World War III so Antichrist can arise?

If this is the case, then the overriding issue of the present administration is to successfully complete this attack so the world war scenario would begin to play out. What are the key elements that President Bush would need to handle just right to ensure that so many years of Illuminati planning do not come to naught? Once we list these key elements, you will see how important this election has been to President Bush and his entire administration.

1. The American people will have to be brought very gradually to the point where they will support the Iraqi attack. The main reason we attacked Afghanistan first was to deflect any suggestion that Iraq was the primary target from the beginning. Further, once we claimed "victory" in that campaign, the American people are more likely to believe Iraq will be as soft a target.

2. A very long propaganda campaign needs to be implemented that will graphically paint the extreme danger posed by Iraq. Domestic terror is the key to this element; after 9/11, we need little stimulus to understand the depths of the danger these terrorists pose to our domestic cities. We have had 14 months so far of a steady diet of warnings about possible terror attacks so we are well prepared to believe the worst about the potential Iraq has to attack devastatingly using terror techniques.

3. Our military needed time to build up the necessary munitions and men necessary to attack Iraq. We were short of key munitions after the Afghanistan campaign, but not for the reason we have been led to believe. We are told that the Clinton Administration so badly depleted our armed forces that we were just short of nearly everything; therefore, after Afghanistan, we needed a year to replenish our stocks. However, the reality is that we needed the time to ratchet up the propaganda machine that would convince us of the need to go to war. A "crash" production effort to produce these key munitions has made wonderful fodder for the Mass Media Mill. For over a year now, we have been constantly told all the various deficiencies that needed to be replenished before we could go to war. In this long process, our minds have been gradually conditioned to accept the war, feel the war was necessary, and actually want to "get it on" with the dictator, Saddam.

4. The President needed as much popularity as possible and he needed a ballot box mandate. Perhaps dictators can go to war without the support of his people, at least a limited war, but countries whose citizens go to the ballot box need to be led to war in a far different manner. In these latter type of countries, the top leadership who wants to go to war needs to skillfully create the scenario by which the people will be seen as strongly supporting his policies, even to the point where many of them actually will demand the very course of action the leadership has contemplated all along.

This mid-term election is an excellent case in point. When most citizens went into the ballot booth, they had many things on their minds other than Iraq, and more important than Iraq. Many people voted because of their interest in state and local races, in state and local referendums, and in Congressional races. We will never know the exact figure, but I suspect in my inner heart that most voters considered some other issue far more important than Iraq.

Yet, the Mass Media can paint a far different picture; in other words, they can "frame" the issues of the debate. In this case, pundits and "talking heads" built up the election as the ultimate referendum on President Bush's policies, chief of which was Iraq. The President furthered this perception by actively campaigning for various seats across the country. As far as the media was concerned, a vote for the Democrat candidate was a vote against the President's policies, while a vote for the Republican candidate was a vote in support of his policies.

Democrat "talking heads" contributed mightily to this misconception by boldly predicting a Democrat win across the board, resulting in Democrat control of the Senate and the House.

Thus, when the Republicans won the Senate and the House of Representatives, they could make the claim that the people were broadly supporting the President's policies, also across the board. Pundits could claim that President Bush now had a mandate to rule, across the board! In other words, they can now claim that Bush has a mandate to achieve all the goals for which he has been seeking, from Iraq to tax cuts, to budget policy, to Homeland Security, etc.

Let us examine the current news stories to see if this is what is, in fact, occurring.

NEWS BRIEF: "Bush moves on Saddam after victory", by James Hall and Allison Hardie, The Scotsman, Thursday, November 7, 2002, http://www.images.scotsman.com/2002/11/07/0711bushb.jpg

"GEORGE Bush, the US president, yesterday moved swiftly to turn the screw on Saddam Hussein as he produced a tough new United Nations resolution on Iraq, just hours after the US electorate gave him a resounding mandate to step up the war on terror."

Did you notice the extremely strong words to describe the results of this midterm election? They gave President Bush a "resounding mandate" to step up the war on terror generally, and against Saddam Hussein specifically. But, this article continues:

"It was a clear indication that Mr. Bush, buoyed by the stunning Republican victory in the US elections, had returned to his foreign agenda with renewed vigour." Notice how these domestic relations were said to strengthen the President's hand on his "foreign agenda"?

NEWS BRIEF: "What I Missed", by Political Consultant Dick Morris, N. Y. Post, November 7, 2002. http://nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/61569.htm

"President Bush completed, in 2002, the unfinished business of 2000. Deprived of a popular plurality when he was elected, he scored big with the American people this week and demonstrated that his presidency has a mandate ..."

Did you notice that statement? Bush's "presidency has a mandate".

NEWS BRIEF: "New England Republicans Have Ear of Bush, GOP Congress", by Melissa Robinson, Associated Press, 11/7/2002.

"' 'Democrats are going to have to fight very, very hard so Bush does not turn this election into a mandate for cutting social programs and environmental protections,' said Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass." [Emphasis added]

NEWS BRIEF: "A new agenda for Bush", Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily, November 8, 2002, http://www.cuttingedge.org/news_updates/newsupdatemain.html

"Now that President Bush has the political mandate he never received in 2000, it's time to wield that clout."

Notice Farah repeat the administration mantra, "Bush has the political mandate".

We shall return to the subject of "wielding that clout" later on in this article, but for now, we have established the fact that establishment news outlets are drumming the beat that this election presented Bush a mandate to rule and to carry out his policies.

MANDATE TO RULE IN WHICH AREAS?

Iraq

While the President has been taking his case urgently to the American people, saying that Saddam Hussein and his evil regime pose so great a risk to our safety and security that we need to take him out sooner rather than later, he has had more than his share of doubters and naysayers. These doubters fall into several distinct categories:

1. People who believe Iraq does not really possess Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

2. People who believe that an attack on Iraq might very well plunge the entire Middle East region into a fiery conflagration of war

3. People who oppose war on any grounds and against any enemy

4. People who believe our priorities need to be put in areas other than a foreign war, especially a foreign war against an enemy of suspect capabilities

The question of the hour is: how does a President get the great majority of the people in each of these categories to support his effort at war? Remember Adolf Hitler's infamous propaganda principle -- "truth is not what is, truth is what people perceive it to be".

In propaganda, perception is all important: illusion is king, while true reality is scoffed at.

The President and all the "talking heads" built this mid-term election into far more than just an election. Since the President has been arguing for over a year now that Iraq was enough of a threat to attack her, he needed visible affirmation that he was right all along and that the people now strongly support him. Thus, in the weeks and months leading up to this election, the "experts" and "journalists" repeated the mantra "this election is a referendum of Bush's policies, especially Iraq". They said it so many times the citizenry actually believed it.

Therefore, when the Republicans won, these same pundits can step forward to claim that Bush now has a firm and clear mandate from the people to pursue the Iraq war the way he thinks it should be fought. Are news stories saying this today? Let us review some examples:

NEWS BRIEF: "GOP majority could mean tougher foreign policy road for Bush, analysts say", The Boston Globe, 11/7/2002, http://boston.com/dailynews/311/wash/GOP_majority_could_mean_toughe:.shtml

"WASHINGTON (AP) It would be tempting for President Bush to view his party's midterm election conquest as carte blanche from the American people to press foreign policy priorities like Iraq and terrorism even harder. But he should resist that temptation, analysts say, or risk whipping up antipathy among European allies already seething over what they view as his go-it-alone approach to world affairs ...

"World nations looked at Tuesday's election, which restored Republican control of both houses of Congress, as a sure sign that the United States will, among other things, move quickly toward military action to oust Iraq's Saddam Hussein."

Did you catch that phrase? "sure sign that the United States will .. move quickly toward military action".

NEWS BRIEF: "Bush seizes the moment to push UN", by Rupert Cornwell and David Usborne, Independent.co.uk, 7 November 2002, http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=349656

"Bolstered by sweeping Republican gains in the congressional elections, the Bush administration submitted to the United Nations Security Council yesterday a draft resolution on Iraq that leaves the door open to war against Saddam Hussein at any time. The keenly awaited diplomatic move, which America wants to see followed by a vote as early as today, has been given new weight by President George Bush's personal triumph in winning control of both the Senate and House of Representatives on Tuesday – only the third time in 100 years the party of a sitting president has improved its position in a mid-term vote. Mr Bush's victory will strengthen the administration's hand in forcing the disarmament of Iraq, by force if necessary. Though Congress has already given him broad authority to go to war, this week's vote will be seen as a mandate for war."

"This week's vote will be seen as a mandate for war" is the mandate mantra. The more people hear this mantra, the more they will believe it. The momentum has clearly shifted to Bush's favor because of the election. Weak American presidents do not make war; rather, they wait until the momentum toward war has shifted into their favor before embarking on substantial military action. President Franklin Roosevelt is a good example. Even though Hitler's war machine had overrun Europe and was threatening both Russia and Great Britain with disaster and defeat, President Roosevelt was constrained from entering the war because of the strong antiwar sentiment amongst the people. FDR had to wait until after the Pearl Harbor attack to commit America to war; historians universally recognize that America goaded Japan into that attack for the express purpose of uniting Americans behind the President for war. Every one of the ships destroyed at Pearl Harbor was obsolete and needed to be replaced; conversely, all carriers put to sea before the attack even though they were running "naked" without normal escort.

President Lyndon Johnson is another example of a president who could not commit American forces to action in Vietnam because the sentiment of the people was clearly set against such action. The Gulf of Tonkin attack provided the momentum that allowed Johnson to commit American troops to the Vietnam quagmire; current historians now know the Gulf of Tonkin was a lie, and was staged simply to forge a consensus in Congress and amongst the people for war.

President Bush, Sr., carefully built up American public opinion in support of Gulf War I by using his meticulous campaign to garner the support U.N. and independent nations to his cause. Once he had gained the support of numerous nations to our side, he launched the conflict. At the time, he had over 80% approval ratings.

We are now at a most momentous time in American and world history. We are now at President #11 since FDR and President #6 since Lyndon Johnson; today, this election has provided President Bush with the momentum he needs to pursue this nonsensical war against a paper tiger enemy who probably does not have the Weapons of Mass Destruction of which we are accusing him.

But, you say, how can I lump this election in with the obviously contrived incidents of Pearl Harbor and Gulf of Tonkin? How can I believe this election was manipulated so as to give President Bush his mandate? To this objection, I list the following points to consider:

1. Satan is the Lord of this World, the Prince of the Power of the Air. With so much of the American electorate living a live not pleasing to God, it is relatively a simple matter for Satan and his demonic host to influence the thinking and the emotions of the people, just as Daniel 10 demonstrates. [Read NEWS1727 for a full treatment of this subject of spiritual warfare in the heavenlies]

2. The Mass Media, which is wholly owned by the Illuminati, has finely honed their art of public persuasion, using the Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan [Read NEWS1055 for a complete explanation of this insidious, invisible manner by which the attitudes and values of an entire population can be changed]

3. Joseph Stalin owns the perennial best quote on how to fix an election, when he stated: "He who votes counts for nothing, but he who counts the vote counts for everything." Since the advent of the computerized voting machines, it has become easier and easier to control the vote tally. A long-term subscriber, who has his own ministry, called me up the day after the election, to tell me that, for the first time in his adult life, he did not vote. He said, "Since my state has put the touch screen voting machines, not one upset has occurred." That is a very astute observation, and right on the money. In the Florida election of 2000, we focussed so much on the "hanging chad" and the problems with paper ballots that we lost sight of the comforting paper trail they produce. When human beings count and recount paper ballots, cheating is harder to do, but when computers replace paper ballots, that all-important paper trail is lost. When votes go into cyberspace and become just "X's" and "O's", the vote tally can be whatever the authorities want it to be.

Now, President Bush has his all-important mandate to go to war. Now that he has gotten past the United Nations, he will be able to set his sights squarely on Iraq, thereby possibly fulfilling Bible prophecy [NEWS1704], starting that World War III without which their Illuminist Masonic Christ cannot appear!

The all-important nature of this election can be seen from the fact that President Bush refrained from submitting his "tough resolution" on Iraq to the United Nations Security Council until the day after the election! Bush could have submitted this resolution weeks ago, but he waited until the day after he received his election "mandate" to put his resolution before the U.N.

Homeland Security

Did you know that Adolf Hitler established his "Homeland (Deutschland) Security"? He did, and its name was the Gestapo. This nefarious internal police force regularly carried out the very activities that the Patriot Act gives the president, and other functions for which the president is now seeking. You can watch this nightmare unfolding in your Daily News, as President Bush will demand, and get, total dictatorial powers; however, the Illuminati will also get what they desire: they will get total dictatorial powers from a public who will be demanding that their freedoms be taken away! Do we hear such calls for this today?

NEWS BRIEF: "Bush Charts Course for GOP Rule", by Sandra Sobieraj, Excite News, 11/7/02, http://apnews.excite.com/article/20021108/D7N5J7JG0.html

"WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush, charting an agenda for the new Republican Congress, said Thursday that homeland security comes first ... Bush's insistence that the Senate deliver him a Homeland Security Department in its postelection session put him awkwardly at odds with newly empowered Senate Republican leader Trent Lott ... But after Bush spoke, Lott told reporters that if he has any power to control the session's schedule, he would push the president's plan. 'It would be a big leap but I'll make a huge effort to get it done,' Lott said."

Senator Lott's comments hold out the possibility that Congress may move in November - December to give President Bush the type of Homeland Security for which he is seeking. Bush may not have to wait until the First Quarter of 2003, when the new GOP-led Congress convenes. If another domestic terror attack is carried out in this interim, Senator Lott would have a very easy time pushing this dictatorial bill through Congress; many a lame-duck senator or congressman who would normally oppose the president could be convinced to cast their vote for him, casting the vote that will become the president's after the new Congress convenes.

NEWS BRIEF: "After the Celebration: What Can a GOP Senate Do?", Fox News, November 7, 2002, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,69345,00.html

"WASHINGTON — As confetti is swept away and hangovers subside, Republican circles are moving full throttle to take advantage of the so-called "lame-duck" session of Congress -- the weeks between the old and new Senate -- and jump-start the new GOP-controlled session beginning Jan. 3. Lawmakers face an array of unresolved issues during the lame-duck session and Republicans want to make certain their priorities take the Senate's attention. Either way, they are ready to move on their agenda in two months, as soon as the 108th Senate is sworn in with at least a 51-seat Republican majority.

"In a press conference Wednesday morning, Republican Minority Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi said he was eager to pursue legislation that had been hanging in the balance -- including the homeland security bill ..."

Once again, we can see that the #1 priority is to advance the Homeland Security Bill. This agency is designed as the all-powerful internal administrative agency that will control all domestic police matters. This is the agency that will administer all the fearsome powers and authorities contained within the Patriot Act; as heinous as the Patriot Act is, it cannot be implemented until an agency is created and set in place that will oversee the administration of those police powers.

Just like the Gestapo.

We have written much of the loss of personal freedoms and liberties contained within the Patriot Act and other bills passed after 9/11. We encourage you to read:

NEWS1550 -- "Bitter Fruits Of Bush's War On Terrorism: Loss Of Constitutional And Personal Freedoms"

NEWS1553 -- "Bush Administration Is Already Redefining 'Terrorist' "

NEWS1580 -- " 'Domestic Terrorist' Reported In Clinton-Era FBI Flyer Has Now Been Codified Into Law: Patriot Act Will Be Our Undoing"

NEWS1575 -- "Bush Administration To Use Civil War Era 'Seditious Law' That Jails People Who Just Criticize Government"

Just like the Gestapo.

The only difference is that Americans will be demanding that these dictatorial laws be instituted! At the first large terrorist strike in our cities, poor frightened Americans will demand the government do anything and everything possible to restore peace and tranquility, even if that means giving up our freedoms. As Ben Franklin said so long ago:

"Those who would give up liberty to gain security deserve neither liberty nor security".

When our liberties are taken away, that part of the Illuminist plan called The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion will have been fulfilled. Listen:

"WE ARE WOLVES -- The gentiles are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock? .....There is another reason also why they will close their eyes: for we shall keep promising them to give back all the liberties we have taken away as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace and tamed all parties ..... It is not worthwhile to say anything about how long a time they will be kept waiting for this return of their liberties."

Terrorism At Home And Abroad

In the name of fighting terror, our Congress has hastily passed legislation that, if carried out, and if the definition of terrorist were changed, could be used against American citizens who just dissented from the official government line. As you will see as we go through the facts of this article, American citizens could wake up to that Midnight Knock on the Door so typical of dictatorships. It could never happen here, you say? If you believe this, you are showing your naiveté’.

The first fact we must consider is that this major bill – dubbed the Patriot Bill – was passed very, very quickly by Congress, in almost record speed. Listen to a news article from last year that speaks to this subject:

NEWS BRIEF: "Police State", by Kelly Patricia O’Mera, Insight News, 11/9/01.

"If the United States is at war against terrorism to preserve freedom, a new coalition of conservatives and liberals is asking, why is it doing so by wholesale abrogation of civil liberties? They cite the Halloween-week passage of the antiterrorism bill — a new law that carries the almost preposterously gimmicky title: "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act" (USA PATRIOT Act). Critics both left and right are saying it not only strips Americans of fundamental rights but does little or nothing to secure the nation from terrorist attacks. "

Did you hear that pertinent phrase? "It not only strips Americans of fundamental rights but does little or nothing to secure the nation from terrorist attacks. "

Representative Paul describes this bill further. "What is so bad about the new law? "Generally," says Paul, "the worst part of this so-called antiterrorism bill is the increased ability of the federal government to commit surveillance on all of us without proper search warrants." He is referring to Section 213 (Authority for Delaying Notice of the Execution of a Warrant), also known as the "sneak-and-peak" provision, which effectively allows police to avoid giving prior warning when searches of personal property are conducted. Before the USA PATRIOT Act, the government had to obtain a warrant and give notice to the person whose property was to be searched. With one vote by Congress and the sweep of the president's pen, say critics, the right of every American fully to be protected under the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures was abrogated. The Fourth Amendment states: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

"According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which is joining with conservatives as critics of the legislation, the rationale for the Fourth Amendment protection always has been to provide the person targeted for search with the opportunity to ‘point out irregularities in the warrant, such as the fact that the police may be at the wrong address or that the warrant is limited to a search of a stolen car, so the police have no authority to be looking into dresser drawers’. Likely bad scenarios involving the midnight knock at the door are not hard to imagine ... This law clearly authorizes illegal search and seizure, and anyone who thinks of this as antiterrorism needs to consider its application to every American citizen’."

When Representative Paul and the ACLU can agree on anything, that is big news, indeed, and they agree that this bill could put police at the door of American citizens during the wee hours of the morning. Since Bush is driving the world into the global government of the New Age Christ, the Biblical Antichrist, we Christians should be mightily concerned!

But, this new law contains even more horror. "The new laws also allow ‘roving wiretaps’ of suspected spies or terrorists, meaning the government can monitor any telephone used by a terrorism suspect, rather than getting separate authorizations for each phone that person uses. The laws make it much easier for the government to secretly collect someone's business, medical, credit card or other records. The bank, doctor, even a library turning over the records is bound to secrecy. "

Thus, if the director of your bank receives a government demand for information previously denied, that director would be prevented from notifying the customer that the government was prying!

There is still more horror coming from the Bush Administration! NEWS BRIEF: "Government proposes rule to eavesdrop on phone calls between lawyers and clients in terrorist probe", by Pete Yost, Associate Press, News Flash, 11/8/01.

"WASHINGTON (AP) -- The government says it can get around attorney-client confidentiality as it investigates the terrorist attacks by allowing prisons to monitor phone calls and mail of some of those jailed after Sept. 11 … The rule went into effect the day before it became public."

Let me repeat that last sentence just in case you missed it: "The rule went into effect the day before it became public." In other words, the government implemented this new violation of traditional lawyer/client communication privilege one day before it "proposed" this change. Further, note the horrific attitude of the Bush Administration, where they said they could "get around attorney-client confidentiality". You would expect this kind of attitude from Communists but not from a supposedly Christian Administration who has sworn with his right hand on the Bible to "faithfully uphold" the laws and the Constitution of the United States of America. Yet, this same Administration is doing everything in its power to dissolve the Constitution and the attendant Bill of Rights that has protected us so well.

But, there is more horror yet: the FBI is now changing before our very eyes into an International Surveillance Agency. NEWS BRIEF: "An Intelligence Giant In The Making: Anti-terrorism Law Likely To Bring Domestic Apparatus of Unprecedented Scope", by Jim McGee, Washington Post Staff Writer, Washington Post, 11/4/01.

"Molded by wartime politics and passed a week and a half ago in furious haste, the new anti-terrorism bill lays the foundation for a domestic intelligence-gathering system of unprecedented scale and technological prowess … [there] were numerous obscure features in the bill that will enable the Bush administration to make fundamental changes at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency and several Treasury Department law enforcement agencies. Known as the U.S.A. Patriot Act, the law empowers the government to shift the primary mission of the FBI from solving crimes to gathering domestic intelligence. In addition, the Treasury Department has been charged with building a financial intelligence-gathering system whose data can be accessed by the CIA. "

In "furious haste" the Patriot Bill allows the FBI to combine resources with the CIA in order to create a super department that will shift from criminal investigations to "gathering domestic intelligence"! In other words, the American KGB has just been created, whose primary emphasis will now be on domestic spying on American citizens! Truly, the Illuminist attack on September 11 has had the effect they wanted all along, i.e., panicking Americans into allowing their freedoms to be taken away. Just how potentially far-reaching are these changes? Let us go back to our current article to allow this journalist tell us. Listen closely:

"The bill effectively tears down legal fire walls erected 25 years ago during the Watergate era, when the nation was stunned by disclosures about presidential abuses of domestic intelligence-gathering against political activists."

President Bush and Attorney General Ashcroft demanded, and got, laws that annihilates "legal fire walls" that have protected American citizens against Presidential abuse! Can you get the concept yet that Bush is not what he appears to be, and that he is leading the world into the global government, economy, and religion of Antichrist, known as the New World Order?

These are the new laws that are supposedly passed to prevent terrorism but is really designed to gather "intelligence" on citizens, not evidence against so-called terrorists. The new law also gives the CIA unprecedented access to the most powerful investigative weapon in the federal law enforcement's arsenal: the federal grand jury. Grand juries have nearly unlimited power to gather evidence in secret, including testimony, wiretap transcripts, phone records, business records or medical records. In the past, Rule 6(e) of the Rules of Federal Procedure required a court order whenever prosecutors shared federal grand jury evidence with other federal agencies. The new law permits allows the FBI to give grand jury information to the CIA without a court order, as long as the information concerns foreign intelligence or international terrorism. The information can also be shared widely throughout the national security establishment."
But, you may argue, neither President Bush nor Attorney General Ashcroft would never, ever turn these immense dictatorial powers against average American citizens. We can trust them to faithfully execute these new powers without abusing them. Right? If this is your belief, listen to this last story, which really reveals the true nature of this administration, hiding behind a carefully created mask.

NEWS BRIEF: "FBI Considers Torture As Suspects Stay Silent", October 22, 2001, The Times, U.K.

"AMERICAN investigators are considering resorting to harsher interrogation techniques, including torture, after facing a wall of silence from jailed suspected members of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network …"

Now, let me get this fact straight: Born Again Christian and Assembly of God Attorney General John Ashcroft is the head of an FBI whose officers are "considering" torture on suspects who are refusing to cooperate?! When this story broke, I looked in vain for a denial from either Ashcroft or President Bush that they would ever, ever use torture on any suspect for any reason. There were no denials! That silence confirmed to me the reality of the true nature of this President and his Attorney General. I have long maintained that President Bush, as a life-long adept in the Satanic Skull & Bones would be highly unlikely to ever turn to Jesus Christ. In August, 2000, during the campaign Candidate Bush was asked to speak to the issue of his Skull & Bones involvement. What a wonderfully golden opportunity to demonstrate his new Born Again heart! A true Christian would have poured out remorse for his participation in such a Black Magick Secret Society, but Bush defended his membership, saying that such activities "make me the man I am today".

Remember Jesus’ warnings about the End of the Age.

"Take heed that no man deceive you." [Matthew 24:4];

"Many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many." [Matthew 24:11].

"There shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect." [Matthew 24:24]

"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world:" [Revelation 12:9]

"And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth ..." [Revelation 13:13-14a]

CONCLUSION

President Bush now has an election "mandate" to pursue Iraq, to establish Homeland Security, and to start enforcing all the "anti-terrorism" laws passed immediately after the 9/11 attacks. Unfettered by strong opposition, and with a "united" America behind him, President Bush becomes a very dangerous person to the thinking American citizen not caught up in the hype and rhetoric, and fully cognizant of who he is, whose agenda he is pursuing, and the planned disasters that may lie directly ahead.

Bible prophecy looms on the horizon, and the Illuminati plans that will fulfill them are now set. We can see in our Daily News that President Bush is now leading the charge to the possible fulfillment of these plans and these prophecies. Let us allow a New Age author to have a last say, and then we shall check with the Bible to see if these things can be so.

"Their script is now written, subject only to last-minute editing and stage-directions. The stage itself, albeit as yet in darkness, is almost ready. Down in the pit, the subterranean orchestra is already tuning up. The last-minute, walk-on parts are even now being filled. Most of the main actors, one suspects, have already taken up their roles. Soon it will be time for them to come on stage, ready for the curtain to rise. The time for action will have come." [The Armageddon Script, by Peter Lemesurier, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1981, p. 252]

President Bush, Russian President Putin, Great Britain's Tony Blair, and Israel's Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, are just actors on a global stage. Does the Bible state that the leaders of the final age will act according to a prearranged plan to successfully stage Antichrist? Listen:

"For God has put it into their hearts to carry out His own purpose by acting in harmony in surrendering their royal power and authority to the beast, until the prophetic words (intentions and promises) of God shall be fulfilled." [Revelation 17:17; Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary; Emphasis added]

As the Bible has told us: "Do two walk together except they make an appointment and have agreed?" [Amos 3:3]

Thus, when you see this many leaders following a plan that you discovered written many decades ago, you know they are agreed to "act in harmony" to "surrender their royal power and authority to the beast".

Are we facing the situation where Illuminati plans to produce Antichrist are being carried out that will exactly fulfill End of the Age prophecy for Antichrist? We apparently are, but will not be sure until events begin to unfold. Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.

If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.

If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.

We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.

Finally, we would love to hear from you.

You can contact us by mail or email.

God bless you.

Subscribe to our email updates and messages from our editor by entering your email address below
Email:
Return to: