Resources to aid your Understanding
Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!
Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.
YOU ARE NOW ON
THE CUTTING EDGE
NEWS BRIEF: "Nuclear Option In Iraq? Sources say U.S. is considering the option", by DEBKAfile, as reported in WorldNetDaily, 03/22/02.
"The White House is considering the use of tactical nuclear weapons and planning the break-up of Iraq as an objective in a broad military campaign set now for April, according to the military and intelligence sources of DEBKA-Net-Weekly ... As a result of the serious threat of nuclear terrorism, the U.S., DEBKA reports, is weighing its own nuclear options ... European and Middle East governments believe the White House may be reverting to the 'second strike' nuclear doctrine espoused by U.S. governments in the U.S.-Soviet Cold War ... Cheney received intelligence evaluations suggesting that in late February, Saddam Hussein attempted to head off a U.S. offensive by transferring to al-Qaida nuclear devices possibly radiological 'dirty bombs' or explosives and containers packed with viruses, including smallpox. This deadly supply may have been cached in any of the following places the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, territory controlled by the Palestinian Authority, Rome or Berlin together with crews standing by for a signal to unleash them, according to DEBKA sources."
In other words, this report is saying that if Iraq or any Arab nations used nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons on the United States, we would then reserve the right to retaliate with our own nuclear weapons. Of course, since the Illuminati controls Saddam Hussein, we know that whatever he does is exactly what the Plan calls for him to do. If "dirty nukes", or biological, or chemical weapons were unleashed upon us, the Illuminati would have its excuse to launch devastating attacks on Iraq, and maybe beyond.
Then, right on cue, suddenly, surprisingly, Britain's Prime Minister Tony Blair shocked and dismayed Parliament by boldly stating that he could order nuclear strikes against Iraq. Listen:
NEWS BRIEF: "U.K. 'prepared to use nuclear weapons'," BBC News, 20 March 2002.
"The UK is prepared to use nuclear weapons against rogue states such as Iraq if they ever used 'weapons of mass destruction' against British troops in the field, defence secretary Geoff Hoon has told MPs. Mr Hoon said he was not certain Britain's nuclear arsenal would deter a first strike from a state willing to sacrifice its own people to make a 'gesture'."
While this policy may seem a reasonable protection of your own troops in the field, we all know that such an Iraqi "first strike" could be manufactured out of thin air, just as the Gulf of Tonkin "attack" was manufactured so as to give America the excuse to commit massive military forces to South Vietnam. Our government could just announce that such a strike had occurred, and the Mass Media would jump all over such an announcement. President Bush could then drum the beat powerfully for retaliation, and hold up even greater terror threats if we do not retaliate. An Iraqi "first strike" with nuclear, chemical, and/or biological weapons could easily be manufactured.
Now, consider an earlier news report that seems to indicate that America may be planning a first strike on Iraq with our nuclear weapons, even if we admit they do not possess any nukes in their arsenal.
NEWS BRIEF: "Iraq Nuke Option", DEBKAfile, 11 March 2002.
"... the American deputy secretary of state for disarmament, John Bolton, stated on February 21 that Washington had decided to depart from its traditional policy of nuclear non-use against non-nuclear powers. The exceptions would be made in the cases of terrorists, their sponsors and states developing weapons of mass destruction. Boltons statement was received in Baghdad as a signal that the United States has decided to use nuclear weapons in its coming offensive, and Saddam Hussein regime has made preparation."
In this diplomatic doublespeak, the American Deputy Secretary of State for Disarmament stated that America would now reserve the right to use nuclear weapons against a nation that did not possess nuclear weapons! This policy shift is huge, as it reverses U.S. policy for the past five decades! The formerly forbidden door to using nuclear weapons has now been kicked wide open. Now, just the perceived "threat" that Iraq may have Weapons of Mass Destruction will be enough "provocation" for the Bush Administration to launch a nuclear strike on Iraq.
With this thought in mind, ponder carefully this most recent announcement:
NEWS BRIEF: "BRITAIN MOVES TRIDENT SUB INTO PERSIAN GULF IN MAJOR ESCALATION OF WAR PREPARATIONS AGAINST IRAQ", Global-Intel, by Gordon Thomas, Number 9, March 21, 2002.
"Britain has moved one of its Trident nuclear submarines into the Persian Gulf. It is a significant escalation of the preparations for the widely predicted war against Iraq. The Trident carries a pay-load of missiles capable of destroying every military target in Iraq. At least one U.S. nuclear weapon-carrying submarine is also said to be in the region. The decision to move the Trident from its regular patrol area in the southern Indian Ocean was authorized by Prime Minister Tony Blair after meeting with Vice-President Dick Cheney during his stop-over in London."
Notice two factors that are exceedingly important about this announcement:
First, notice that Vice President Cheney made a stopover in London as he was preparing to travel to the Middle East to begin his 10-day tour. Tim Cohen demonstrates conclusively that Britain's House of Windsor is the monarchy from which Antichrist will arise. Cohen further demonstrates that all major decisions are made in London, and simply carried out in Washington and other capitals of the world. To demonstrate this fact, Cohen asks you to start noticing the itineraries of the many leaders coming to Washington, D.C., for consultations. You will be amazed how many times the foreign dignitary either stopped in London before coming to Washington, or stopping London on the way back home from Washington. While Cheney was in London, the real consultations were held in secret between Prince Charles and the Vice President. [Antichrist and A Cup of Tea]
Secondly, the Trident is a weapon of First Strike capability against a first-class nuclear opponent, such as Russia. The Trident was designed to engage and defeat a sophisticated enemy, delivering a staggering blow from which that enemy would never recover. Sending it to engage Iraq is exactly like swatting a fly with a huge, heavy sledgehammer. However, positioning one or more Trident submarines against Iraq opens up the largest gap of military capability of Western technology verses Arab technology.
Furthermore, we have deployed against Iraq the most formidable military machine the world has ever seen. Since most people have no idea what the Iraq Army is facing, let us quickly review our array of weaponry facing the poor Iraqi Army right now.
WIDEST GAP IN MILITARY TECHNOLOGY IN WORLD HISTORY?
The technological gap between the nuclear missiles a Trident submarine carries and the Iraqi poor-man's nuclear bomb [if Iraq even has this much of a nuke] may represent the largest technological gap in history. The military gap is so huge that a war could be planned specifically to fight this weaker enemy in order to advance the global strategic goals of the nation wielding the superior power.
To understand this principle more completely, let us examine the findings of a book entitled, "Blood In The Streets", by James Dale Davidson & Sir William Rees-Mogg, Warner Books, A Time Warner Company, 1987. Listen carefully, for these authors present the philosophical underpinnings of this upcoming war, first with Iraq and then with the entire Muslim world.
"... you must turn to megapolitics to find the answers to the deepest puzzles of economic and political life ... The largest of the variables is shifting technology. New weapons and new ways of organizing the use of weapons can sometimes give one group of people an overpowering advantage. With new technology, it can become relatively cheap to deploy force, very costly for anyone to resist. For months or years or decades, or however long it takes for other groups to copy or defeat the advantage, those at a disadvantage will be like the 98-pound weakling confronting a barrel-chested bully. They will bow to power. Or be forced to bow. And the world will change to reflect the new megapolitical reality. Maps will be rewritten." [Page 11-12;Emphasis added]
Today, the forces of the United States, Great Britain, and Israel possess the type of cutting edge weapons technological advantage over the Muslim forces of the world exactly as described above. Let us examine the key element of this passage for its full understanding a application to the coming planned World War III that will produce the New World Order and its Christ.
"New weapons and new ways of organizing the use of weapons can sometimes give one group of people an overpowering advantage. With new technology, it can become relatively cheap to deploy force, very costly for anyone to resist."
When Great Britain moved her Trident submarine into the Persian Gulf in order to take up positions against Iraq, this act fully complied with this explanation. This deployment of a world-class strategic nuclear submarine against Iraq presented Hussein with the specter of "an overpowering advantage". This Trident submarine was "relatively cheap to deploy .... very costly for anyone to resist."
However, the over-all technological advantage of the Axis of Western Powers [U.S., UK, Israel] over the Muslim military forces of the world is enormous. In fact, the advantage is so enormous that both Russia and China will sit on the sidelines for the moment to wait to see what we shall actually do to these hapless Muslim armed forces. Listen to Col. Beardon (Retired) describe our modern military capabilities:
"We have ground-based radars, endoatmospheric interceptors, exoatmospheric interceptors, airborne sensors, space-based sensors, chemically propelled interceptors, electromagnetic railguns, particle beam weapons, high energy lasers, all tied together by a massive command and control systems ... Massive systems. Electromagnetic marvels. Nuclear-pumped lasers of staggering power. Perhaps even x-ray and gamma ray lasers. Directed energy RF weapons. Stupendous railguns. Sensors everywhere. Giant webs of communications. Banks of computers and control systems. ["Fer De Lance", Ibid. , p. 331]
This overwhelming military superiority will "burn right through" the Iraqis, no matter what they throw at us and no matter how enraged or full of hate their armies and the populations might be toward us. Our military has the capability of annihilating entire armies and populations through our vastly superior weaponry.
TECHNOLOGY DETERMINES THE "HIDDEN WORKINGS OF HISTORY"
"The key to the hidden workings of history is technological ...The murderous kings who gave history its start would merely have been murderous nobodies without the tools to chisel their names. Technology is still the driving force that makes history go ...The purpose of this book is to lay bare these hidden, perplexing interconnections. To tell you where to look for the revolutions to come ... Only when one nation has an overwhelming share of economic resources and power does the world economy seem to function smoothly. Only then is there likely to be free trade and open movement of goods, services, people, and capital across borders. The last Great Depression coincided with significant megapolitical development -- the effective collapse of that day's dominant power -- Great Britain." ["Blood In The Streets", p. 16-17]
Today, we hear much of the push for free trade and open movement of goods, services, and people, and it is disconcerting when you realize that the vast majority of the pressure for free trade comes from the United States, the only truly economic superpower since World War II. Surely, Free Trade brings the world ever closer to the global economy, government, and religion of Antichrist! And, America is leading the way [Seminar 2, "America Determines the True Flow of History"].
Then, the authors of this book restate their principle and give a graphic example:
"Weapons technology is the major megapolitical force that determines the power equation. When it is cheaper and easier to project power from the center to the periphery, the number of political units in the world declines ... and economies tend to prosper. When it becomes more costly to project power and cheaper to resist, borders and barriers proliferate. Economies stagnate." ["Blood In The Streets", p. 17]
Then, they give some prime historical examples of military situations in which Great Britain was able to cheaply and easily project power from their center to the peripheral areas of the world.
"In the summer of 1898, the British Empire appeared to be in its heyday. Queen Victoria had celebrated her Diamond Jubilee the year before. London was the undisputed center of world finance and commerce. The British navy ruled the waves ... Then, as now, Moslem extremists were menacing Egypt -- where the British-held Suez Canal was a vital link in world trade. Out in the desert, a force of Islamic true believers was engaged in a jihad, or holy war, against whatever Western targets came within their sights. As the threat grew, London dispatched military forces, under the command of Lord Kitchener. Their mission was to enter the Sudan, secure the Upper Nile, and thus protect British interests in Egypt from attack.
"Opposing the British was Abud Allah ibn Muhammed, the Khalifa of the Dervishes, an Islamic religious leader who was the nearest nineteenth-century equivalent of the Ayatollah Khomeini. Like Khomeini, the Khalifa was bitterly opposed to Western disruptions of the settled ways of Islamic society. Like many groups in the Middle East today, he held hostages. Several who managed to escape told tales of cruelty, torture, and murder that shocked British opinion. [Ibid.]
[Some things never change, do they?]
"The Khalifa commanded an army organized by fierce Islamic fighters known as 'Dervishes' (as in 'whirling dervishes'). Hardened to life in the desert, the Dervish fighters had been taught from childhood to master hand-to-hand combat. They were good at it. They were brave. They were skilled in using knives and muskets. They were also skilled at screaming. Their practice of using noise as a psychological weapon in battle had been widely reported in Europe for many years. As one writer of the 1870's put it, 'And now, their guttural chorus audible long before they arrived in sight, came the howling dervishes'.
"On September 2, 1898, 40,000 Dervishes began to howl as they swarmed across the desert to attack the British Camel Corp. The attack employed a centuries-old tactic that had worked for Dervish armies many times in the past -- a mass frontal assault. The first British troops drew back to the Nile to avoid being overwhelmed. What happened next? Let Winston Churchill tell you. He was there at the battle of Omdurman.
"At the critical moment the gun boat arrived on the scene and began suddenly to blaze and flame from Maxim guns, quick-firing guns and rifles. The range was short; the effect tremendous. The terrible machine, floating gracefully on the waters -- a beautiful white devil -- reethed (sic) itself in smoke. The river slopes of the Kerreri Hills, crowded with the advancing thousands, sprang up into clouds of dust and splinters of rock. The charging Dervishes sank down in tangled heaps. The infantry fired steadily and stolidly, without hurry or excitement, for the enemy were far away and the officers careful. Besides, the soldiers were interested in the work and took great pains ... And all the time out on the plain on the other side, bullets were shearing through flesh, smashing and splintering bone; blood spouted from terrible wounds; valiant men were struggling on through a hell of whistling metal, exploding shells, and spurting dust -- suffering, despairing, dying."
"At the end of five hours of battle, the British had lost 20 men killed. Another 20 Egyptians who accompanied the British were also dead. The Dervishes lost 11,000 dead." [Ibid., p. 32-33]
Nor was this result a rarity.
"In one remote place after another in Africa and Asia, British forces overwhelmed their opponents, at trivial costs. In one battle near Zimbabwe in 1893, 50 British South African police fought 5,000 Ndebele warriors, killing more than 3,000 in an hour and a half. As an African survivor of such a massacre said, 'The whites did not seize their enemy as we do by the body, but thundered from afar. Death raged everywhere -- like death vomited forth from the tempest'. [Ibid., p. 36]
"Earlier in the Century the Celestial Dynasty in China was brought low by British gunboats and a few marines. Without any apparent difficulty, the 'barbarians from the sea' swept in and mauled Chinese forces in a war lasting from 1839 to 1842. The expense to Britain for defeating the most populous nation in the world was trivial, one-tenth of one percent of the gross national product. London's military budget actually fell as the fighting progressed. A few years later, a similar war was fought with equally lopsided results. Again, the Chinese were humiliated.
"The abracadabra in British military success was technological superiority. Weapons in the hands of British forces were far deadlier than those available to fighters in traditional societies of Asia and Africa. This made it very cheap for the British to project power at great distances, very costly for local peoples to resist." [Ibid., p. 36; Emphasis added]
"In 1898, it was cheap for Western powers -- and Great Britain in particular -- to control peoples at the periphery. As Churchill described the battle of Omdurman, it was 'the most signal triumph ever gained by the arms of science over barbarians. Within the space of five hours, the strongest and best-armed savage army yet arrayed against a modern European Power had been destroyed and dispersed, with hardly any difficulty, comparatively small risk, and insignificant loss to the victors." [Ibid.]
"The cost for consolidating control over a restless Middle East was trivial as compared to the cost to native peoples of resisting. Even though native armies were larger, with far better knowledge of local terrain, they were hopelessly outmatched. Britain had modern weapons -- gunboats, breech-loading rifles, machine guns, and more. These weapons were immeasurably superior to those available to people in less technologically advanced societies. As a result, all disputes at the periphery were easily settled. Whenever some local faction threatened investment, stood in the way of trade, or got caught up in a strategic conflict, Britain or another metropolitan power dispatched gunboats and soldiers. The locals had no choice but to yield to overwhelming force -- or else. These who resisted were practically wiped out, absorbing absurd casualties while inflicting almost none." [Ibid., p. 38-39]
Doesn't this last sentence aptly describe the results of the 1991 Gulf War against Iraq? Iraqis "who resisted were practically wiped out, absorbing absurd casualties while inflicting almost none"?
This same situation now exists in the Middle East, with the Western Axis of powers -- Great Britain, the United States, and Israel -- deliberately maneuvering all Muslim nations throughout the world into declaring a jihad, a holy war, against our interests in the entire Middle East, from Israel to Pakistan. Then, when Muslim hordes attack, they shall be annihilated by the greatest military weapons and armed forces the world has ever seen. The technological military gap between Western powers and Muslim powers has never been greater, even though the Muslims have acquired capabilities they did not possess in 1991.
As Tim Cohen demonstrates in Antichrist and A Cup of Tea, the House of Windsor in London draws up all the plans, and uses the economic and military might of the United States to carry these plans out. Israel fits nicely into this equation because it was restored to nationhood by the combined efforts of the United States and Great Britain, and has been supported ever since 1948 -- militarily, economically, and politically. Today, Israel has the capability of annihilating all the combined Arab armed forces surrounding her, and has been very adamant in declaring her intention of using her super-weapons if attacked by Arab numerically superior forces.
ATTACKING IRAQ USING THIS OVERWHELMING WEAPONRY SCENARIO
As we have noted in our Daily News Updates, an incessant drumbeat against Iraq has been going on for a number of weeks now, conditioning people to the "necessity" of taking Saddam Hussein out, even if it is by nuclear war. In U.S. Army Intelligence, I was schooled to the reality that continuous rhetoric from one nation against another can easily be the opening salvo of an actual physical attack later. To put it another way, when you hear continuous rhetoric from one nation against another, you have to consider that, just perhaps, hostilities are imminent.
We have listed at the beginning of this article representative articles that demonstrate this incessant drumbeat rhetoric against Iraq. The Bush Administration even took the bold step of publicly changing our nuclear strike scenario that would now allow us to strike a nation with our nuclear might, even though the targeted nation possesses no nuclear weapons.
The Anglo-Saxon axis of powers [Great Britain, America, and Israel] have planned a war to be fought along the lines specified in the "Blood In The Streets" book. The likely outcome is complete fulfillment of Bible prophecy and the appearance of Antichrist.
Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.
If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.
If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.
If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.
We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.
Finally, we would love to hear from you.
You can contact us by mail or email.
God bless you.