C.F.R PROPOSES NEW ISRAELI WITHDRAWAL PLAN THROUGH SAUDI ARABIA
by DEBKAfile, 25 February 2002
"Probably no one was more surprised than Saudi Arabias virtual ruler, Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdulaziz, by the furor including Israel president Moshe Katsavs offer to fly to Riyadh raised by a single sentence he uttered in an interview to the New York Times columnist Thomas L, Friedman, after it was published February 18:
this is exactly the idea I had in mind full withdrawal
from all the occupied territories, in accordance with UN resolutions, including
in Jerusalem, for full normalization of relations. I have drafted a speech
along those lines [for the Arab League summit meeting in Beirut on March 28].
The Saudi ruler did not pronounce the word peace, mention a halt in the terror
and violence in return for a full Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders,
or expand on his idea in any organized follow-up in a non-media
forum. Given those omissions, Abdullah certainly did not see himself as having
put forward a formal peace initiative. What he was after, according to DEBKAfiles
Middle East sources, was a brush to give his image in America and Washington
a badly needed shine and offset his murky post September 19 record. He selected
one of his harshest critics in the US media.
Abdullah knows quite well that he has come out of the first stage of the Bush
administrations war on terror as its leading opponent. His credentials
as an American ally began dipping in the 1990s, when he effectively blocked
off every bid by US investigators to explore al Qaedas workings and
supporters in the kingdom. Then, when most of the suicides who struck the
WorldTradeCenter in New York and the Pentagon in Washington proved to be Saudi
citizens, Abdullah kept this fact out of the domestic press and tried to gloss
it over. Abdullah stood against the US campaign against Afghanistans
Taliban regime, which Riyadh supported, and denied US forces the use of the
Prince Sultan air base east of Riyadh. He covertly financed the air corridor
that lifted al Qaeda survivors of the Afghan war, many of them Saudi nationals,
to safety in the Persian Gulf and Middle East regions, including south Lebanon.
Through his intelligence agencies and Muslim charities, the crown prince put
up Saudi funds for the Iranian arms cargo, loaded aboard the Karine-A smuggling
freighter later intercepted by Israel on the Red Sea, before it could reach
its Palestinian destination.
Abdullah is the first Arab ruler to confront president Bushs axis
of evil with a tripartite pact made up of Saudi Arabia and two elements
of that axis Iraq and Iran with whom he is synchronizing certain
of his political, military and economic strategies.
And finally, Abdullah never stop funneling oil funds to the Palestinian Islamic
extremist Hamas listed by the State Department as a terrorist organization.
These moneys support Hamass impressive arsenal and reservoir of suicide
killers.
Four days after the Friedman article appeared, he New York Times ran a follow-up
by Henry Siegman, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, who
quoted Saudi officials as saying that
normalization of relations
with Israel does not preclude Israeli sovereignty over the Western Wall in
the Old City and over Jewish neighborhoods in East Jerusalem.
Those same sources also indicated that Saudi Arabia would not object to the
transfer of small areas of the West to Israeli in return for qualitatively
and quantitatively comparable territory to be transferred by Israel to the
Palestinians. The proviso was that such an exchange be the result
of a freely negotiated compromise.
At this point, administration officials decided to find out if Abdullah was
in earnest or just working up a positive spin. William Burns, assistant secretary
of state for the Near East, went to Riyadh to investigate, after which, on
Sunday, February 24, secretary of state Colin Powell telephoned the Crown
Prince. Nothing was published after either conversation.
DEBKAfiles Washington and Middle East sources report that the impression
they gained was unclear. The prince did not back away from his statement to
Friedman, but on the other hand he said he was not sure he would present it
to the Arab summit. Asked to endorse the Saudi officials
additions to Siegman, he denied knowing anything about them.
Turning his back on the episode, Powell therefore went back to stressing that
the first essential step in the Middle East conflict must be a halt in the
violence, before any political steps could be broached. The Abdullah statement
was thus relegated to a non-operative sideline.
Powell must also have been aware of the thumbs down coming from the Palestinian
mainstream group. The central committee of Arafats Fatah movement called
Abdullahs initiative a new stab in the back for the Palestinian
struggle and its legitimate rights. The statement it issued asks the
Saudis if they were willing to bargain and give up their own rights in border
disputes with brotherly Arab states. Why then do they propose initiatives
for giving up territories occupied since 1948, so serving Zionist and
American schemes and ignoring the right of return of expelled Palestinian
refugees.
Arafats Fatah accuses the Saudis of trying to deflect American threats
from certain Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, at the expense of the Palestinian
people.
Summing up, the Americans do not take the Abdullah initiative
seriously; the Palestinians are dead against it, and even the crown prince
himself did not meant it for real. In any case, the Saudis are far from being
out of the woods in Washington. Monday, February 25, the Washington Times
quoted US intelligence officials as reporting that computers seized last year
by NATO troops from Saudi aid organizations in Sarajevo showed photos of past
terrorist targets and a Washington street map pinpointing government buildings.
Yet in Jerusalem the Abdullah throwaway phrase has been seized on as a bright
ray of hope. Israeli president Katsav has invited himself to Riyadh, foreign
minister Shimon Peres is off to Paris to discuss the exciting new development
with President Jacques Chirac and his colleagues in Labor and opposition suggest
Abdullahs non-peace plan provides a reason for freeing Arafat from his
continued confinement in Ramallah."