We have repeatedly warned that the New World Order Plan hates our present Industrialized economies and societies, and envisions their total destruction, to be replaced by an economy that existed 300 years ago. Now, President Clinton is cooperating with the U.N. in an effort to accomplish this exact goal!!

The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!

Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!

Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.



NEWS BRIEF: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,

"International negotiations are underway aimed at curbing greenhouse gas (ghg) emissions. A treaty, to be finalized by the end of 1997, is expected to require " legally-binding" cutbacks in energy usage by developed nations only."

"Summary of the Rio 'Climate Change Treaty' Concerned about the possibility of global warming, the U.S. and other nations met in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, under the auspices of the United Nations, at the "Earth Summit" and signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The UNFCCC calls on industrialized nations to aim to voluntarily limit their greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000. The parties agreed to periodically review the need to consider additional commitments."

I am sure you remember this treaty. President George Bush attended this "Earth Summit" and was shown quite publicly signing his name to the huge document where so many other nations had already signed. While specifics on what was agreed upon were scant at the time, we now are jolted to learn that one of the specific agreements was to reduce greenhouse emission to 1990 levels, by the year 2000. For the United States, this means we will be called upon to reduce our energy consumption by 20%. This is a huge reduction, especially when you understand that we have an growing economy, a growth which inevitably consumes greater and greater amounts of fuel. This type of energy increase will crash our economy, and all Western economies.

While the full horrors of this agreement will become evident in just a short while, the first horrors to be encountered are in the foundational elements of this proposed United Nations accord.

1) First Horror

Only Developed, Industrialized Nations are required to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions as specified above! In other words, the treaty exempts 132 of the 166 nations of the world. What this means is that the non-Industrialized nations are totally exempt from this terrible proposal.

We have consistently stated that the New World Order Plan envisions the complete destruction of our current Industrial society and economy, replacing it with the kind of Agricultural Economy and Society that existed in the Western World 300 years ago. You can read NEWS1106, "Hatred Toward Our Civilization", to get the full story. But, briefly, the leaders of the New World Order Plan do not want to seize control of the entire world, only to discover that it is nearly out of fuel and of the various ores necessary to maintain the high standard of life they envision for themselves and their families. Since this is true, they are especially angry toward the Industrialized nations of the world, especially the United States, Europe, and Japan. In the interim period leading up to the establishment of the New World Order, first steps are to be taken, under the guise of "Global Warming", to reduce consumption of these irreplaceable elements. Since New World Order scientists insist that Global Warming is occurring, and that the emissions from Industrialized countries are causing it, we see this weird treaty coming out of the United Nations which places severe limits on greenhouse gases of Industrialized nations!

At this point, do not tell me that this type of plan cannot be occurring, because national leaders would not lead their nations into an agreement that would destroy the very nations they are leading. For you to think in this vein shows that you still do not understand that our national leaders are not Americans first, but that they are Globalists first. They believe the world must go into a Global Government, by force if necessary. Certainly, they believe that the present nations of the world must "die" as the occult legendary Phoenix bird dies, so that out of the ashes of this immolation can come the New World Order. But, the very top leadership of the New World Order Plan is even more interested in getting control of a world that is still well stocked of fuel and ores, not a world that is running on empty.

2) Second Horror

The United States, and all other Industrialized and Non-Industrialized governments of the world are voluntarily subjecting themselves to this plan. "The U.S. Administration [Clinton] has said it would support 'quantified and legally-binding emission targets', an international emission trading system, and creation of a United Nations-type body that would oversee monitoring and enforce compliance." [Ibid] [Emphasis ours]


Did you fully understand the significance of this statement? This statement means that America has just surrendered a huge chunk of our national sovereignty. This is just the latest example of American national sovereignty being eroded, bit by bit. This statement means that the Clinton Administration is going to agree that a United Nations Government can tell "ABC Company" in Peoria, for example, what it can and cannot do. This means that the UN Government can levy fines, and probably taxes on "ABC Company", and by extension, any other company within the United States. Once you can levy fines, you can control taxes. Once you can control taxes, you have the life of "ABC Company" in your hands. Once the UN Government has the life of companies in their hands, they will begin to snuff them out, to "protect" the global environment, of course. How does a government "enforce compliance" over a person or a company or another government that is recalcitrant? The ultimate weapon with which to "enforce compliance" is the military. Does our current effort to transfer men and weapons and support materiel to the United Nations military take on greater significance now? It should, because the Industrialized nations of the world, generally the G-7 nations, are busily transferring so much men, materiel, and weapons to the U.N., that soon, the only Super Power in the world will be the United Nations!! Then, the Antichrist will be able to rise and take control over the entire world.

Then, will prophecy be fulfilled, "Also the ten horns that you observed are ten rulers (kings) who have as yet received no royal dominion, but together they are to receive power and authority as rulers for a single hour, along with the beast. These have one common policy (opinion, purpose) and they deliver their power and authority to the beast." [Amplified Bible Commentary]

"For God has put it into their hearts to carry out His own purpose by acting in harmony in surrendering their royal power and authority to the beast until the prophetic words (intentions and promises) of God shall be fulfilled." [Revelation 17:17, Amplified Bible Commentary]

In this verse, above, God foretells that the 10 Rulers of the Super Nations will work together with one common purpose, or goal: to gather all the political and economic power in the world unto themselves, and then immediately give that accumulated power to the Antichrist! Of course, we have detailed time and time again that the New World Order Plan has already drawn the world into 10 Super Nations, of which NAFTA was Nation #1. You can go to NEWS1002, "NAFTA Is Fulfillment Of Bible Prophecy", to get the full story. These 10 nations were drawn together from 1992-1996, just as their "25-Year Campaign For The Earth blueprinted [ NEWS1028, "1997 -- The Year The New World Order Plan Changes To Produce The 'Thinning of Population' and Antichrist"]

This current action in reducing Greenhouse Emissions is simply and only a ploy to hand over American sovereignty to the United Nations, and to begin to destroy our hated economy so they can replace it with an economy of 300 years ago [Read NEWS1106, "Hatred Toward Our Industrialized Civilization"]

Now, let us return to our discussion of the "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)". We will quote Representative Ron Lewis, House of Representatives, Congress of the United States, as he answers the concerns of a constituent.

"Thank you for contacting me with your concerns about the Clinton administration's involvement with United Nations' efforts that could lead to limits on the use of Diesel fuel in the United States ... Bob, we have taken a close look at this issue. I can't say that I'm very encouraged about what we have found."

"There is a pending international treaty known as the U.N. Framework Convention of Climate Change (UNFCCC). Supporters of UNFCCC are attempting to use this effort much in the same way they used the Montreal Protocol (another multi-nation agreement) to ban agriculture's future use of methyl bromide. Agriculture organizations such as the Farm Bureau are beginning to raise the awareness about this issue and its effect on U.S. agriculture."

"Greenhouse gas emissions are the main target of the UNFCCC agreement. Supporters claim twenty percent of greenhouse gas emissions can be blamed on agriculture. Among their proposals are fuel economy requirements, the reduction or phase out of diesel fuel use, restrictions on fertilizer use, and restrictions on livestock production to reduce methane emissions."

Let us stop a moment to examine what we have already learned.

1) Even diesel fuel might be banned under this treaty. Diesel fuel is hugely important to our economy. Most trucks run on it, and believe me, this economy would shut down in a matter of weeks if truck deliveries were stopped. Much of the engines of industry also run on diesel fuel.

2) Restrictions of the use of fertilizers is included in this plan. Prince Charles of England undertook the responsibility to test the practicality of "Natural Farming", i.e., farming without commercial fertilizers, just as farmers did 300 years ago. After nearly a decade of such tests, it was determined that "Natural Farming" could only produce one-third of the produce that is now grown with commercial farming. This sounds like New World Order leaders would then abandon the idea of farming without commercial fertilizers, but no, they were encouraged by these results. Why would they be encouraged? Because the New World Plan envisions a two-thirds reduction in the population of the world, leaving only one-third of the people to feed!!

3) Restrictions of livestock production is part of this plan, in order to "reduce methane emissions". When I heard the idea that the natural gas of cows was contributing to the destruction of ozone, and to global warming, I nearly fell on the ground laughing. I grew up on a dairy farm, and can tell you that, if cows passed that much gas, I would have definitely smelled in when working among a herd of 100 cows and calves. Not only do cows not pass that much gas, but the atmosphere above is so huge that it would easily absorb much more natural gas than what cows can produce.

This restriction is one more instance of a part of the New World Order Plan being fulfilled. One of the most common points of belief and practice amongst occultists all over the world is the practice of "Vegetarianism", not eating meat. We have reported the many public relations scares of the past two decades designed to get Americans to voluntarily stop eating meat. And, meat consumption is definitely down. However, it is not down enough. Therefore, cattle production will be so limited that prices will be driven up to the point where people WILL stop buying meat.

If you currently own a dairy farm or raise cattle for beef, you should begin to sell out and find work elsewhere. If you do not, you will be forced out at ruinous losses! To be forewarned is to be forearmed. You have been forewarned.

Then, Representative Ron Lewis revealed that the Clinton Administration is planning on implementing this plan with or without Congressional approval! "In September of last year, Congressman Dan Schaefer, Chairman of the Energy and Power Subcommittee of the House Commerce Committee held hearings on climate change. During the hearing Chairman Schaefer questioned the administration's witness about controls on agriculture. The answer was 'no, we are not considering controls on agriculture.' Nevertheless, the Clinton administration is charging full steam ahead with enthusiastic support for UNFCCC. I believe this another way for the environmental groups to achieve their goals of world wide influence without the consent of Congress or the American people."

Surprise, surprise!! The Clinton Administration first lies to the Congress about their plans, as they deny that they are planning "controls on agriculture", and then they plan on taking these Draconian steps even without the approval of Congress! I believe this type of action can be defined as "dictatorial".

Ron Lewis continues: "The time has come for Congress and the affected industries like

agriculture to let the administration know their concerns. Recently 17 farm organizations wrote President Clinton expressing concerns and asking to be included in future negotiations. I will continue to monitor the issue and express concerns at each opportunity given, although Congress may not address the agreement. I assure you I will keep your concerns, as well

as those of the agriculture community in mind as this issue unfolds."

A list of some of the companies and organizations which are very concerned follows.

List of Sponsors

(taken from

You can see that many of the groups which would naturally be affected are rightly concerned about this proposed agreement [not legislation, because Congress is going to be left out of the loop).

Now, let us turn our attention to the fact that 4 out of every 5 nations in this world are going to be exempt from the requirements of this UN agreement. "The agreement would be binding only on the U.S. and other industrialized nations. 132 out of 166 nations – e.g., China, India, Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, most OPEC nations and others – are exempt under present rules and have made it clear they will not agree to any commitments. Nations not affected by the UN proposals account for about half of the current carbon emissions and will account for about 75% over the next century, so that reductions by developed countries only will have little environmental benefit." [,html]

Please stop to think about the economies of most of these nations: most of them are not as Industrialized as the United States, Europe, and Japan, and none of them is perceived as consuming nearly as much as we do. South Korea, for example, is Industrialized, at least in the major cities, but they do not consume the amount of fuel and other resources, on a per capita basis, as do we. Therefore, they are not going to have to abide by this agreement.

But, then we have a huge outrage occurring, when we see that not only are OPEC nations going to be exempt from this treaty, they are asking that we Industrialized nations reimburse them for their monetary losses when we don't buy their fuel anymore! "Oil producing and other developing nations have proposed that they be reimbursed for the economic losses they would suffer if the industrialized world cuts back on its use of fossil fuel. The negotiating text before the UN includes a proposal for developed countries to compensate oil producing and other nations, which will not be bound by the agreement, for 'social and economic losses arising from implementation of the present instrument' and developing countries 'shall have a claim … for the loss of income from export of fossil fuel products, raw material other than fossil fuels or finished or semi-finished goods.' " [Ibid]

This proposal amounts to National Welfare!! We are going to pay them for the oil we now do not need to buy?!! We are going to have to pay undeveloped nations for the finished or semi-finished goods that we are now not going to need, and cannot afford, because our economy is destroyed?! Again, we see another nail in the coffin of the economies of the Industrialized nations! You do not need to be a rocket scientist to understand that this UN agreement is designed to destroy the economies of the Industrialized world, especially the United States. If you have any illusions as to this fact, listen to the following quote:

"Other countries also are suggesting they know best how Americans should live -- e.g., the U.K.'s Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, has said, 'the lifestyle of America and elsewhere cannot be contained much beyond another quarter of a century ...' " [Ibid] There you have the proof you need: New World Order leaders the world over are angry every day over the amount of raw materials that the United States, and a handful of other Industrialized nations, consume. They are going to put a stop to it, as soon as the New World Order Plan is fully implemented. And plans such as this one, contribute mightily to this implementation.

"The U.S. has indicated its support of a United Nation's body to oversee the assessment of compliance and to implement restrictions ... Legally binding measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must be enforced to be meaningful. The enforcement must come from outside the borders of sovereign nations ... Aside from the inevitable economic costs that must be borne by every nation, the diminution of national sovereignty is a price every nation should question before adopting any legally binding protocol to solve a suspected problem that may not exist." [Ibid., quoting Eco-Logic Bonn, March 6, 1997, published by Sovereignty International, Henry Lamb, editor]

"Solving a suspected problem that may not exist". Doesn't that statement ring a bell? To anyone who has been reading our material, this statement should remind you of the original New World Order plan as enunciated by the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion". Listen as they describe the final part of the Plan to establish their global government, at the end of Protocol 13.

"When we come into our kingdom, our orators will expound great problems which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring it at the end under our beneficent rule. Who will ever suspect, then, that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?"

You are looking at a prime example of a "great problem which have turned humanity upside down", i.e., global warming caused by greenhouse gases! Now, look at the expected end of these great problems, the "beneficent rule" of the New World Order!! Do not be deceived: this Plan is close to implementation, and will result in your loss of either life, or lifestyle.

And, this "global problem" is totally manufactured, totally made up. Let us now consider the science aspect of this problem. You will discover that this Global Warming problem does not exist. We have already quoted the Eco-Logic Bonn, March 6, 1997, above. Now, listen to another voice.

"... as negotiators prepared to gather in Bonn in July to discuss a climate treaty that could require nations to adopt expensive policies for limiting their emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, many climate experts caution that it is not at all clear yet that human activities have begun to warm the planet or how bad greenhouse warming will be when it arrives." ( Science, May 16, 1997, quoted by

In other words, enough scientists are doubtful that the Global Warming is occurring at all, or if it is, that it is caused by greenhouse gases, that Science magazine ran this article, quoted above. In fact, so much scientific evidence exists to show that Global Warming may be a gigantic hoax, that we learn:

"There is conflicting scientific data over whether there is a warming trend. Global surface temperature estimates indicate a rise of 0.3 and 0.6 degrees C (0.5 to 1.1 degrees F) since the late 19th Century. This change is within the range of natural variability. Most of the warming in the surface measurements occurred before 1940, well before any significant increase in man-made ghg emissions. However, National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA) satellite measurement show no net warming over the past 18 years -- in fact, they show a slight cooling trend over the last eighteen years." []

If all this Global Warming issue is such a hoax, how can our leaders and our media get away with such a huge lie? Adolf Hitler enunciated the Propagandist's maxims when he said, "Truth is not what is; truth is what people perceive it to be". Remember that we are living in the age where several successive generations of citizens have been deliberately "dumbed down" in school. This dumbing down has reached the point where many millions of American adults today do not consistently, or critically, read the news. Therefore, they are susceptible to the big lie, and the consistently told lie. That brings us to Hitler's second Propaganda Maxim, "When you tell a lie, tell a BIG lie, for people are more likely to believe a big lie than a small one". This maxim is, unfortunately, true also. How much larger of a lie can you tell than a "global" one?

Now, let us examine the potential Economic disaster this Plan is likely to produce.

"It is a fact that limiting carbon dioxide emissions will mean significant changes in energy use and energy sources." (Senator John Chafee, Committee on Environment and Public Works hearing, July 17, 1997.) The tie between energy usage and economic growth is well-documented. Using coal, oil and natural gas is a large source of man-made greenhouse gas emission but provides our lowest cost sources of energy. Thus global climate policy has the potential of completely upsetting the economy. Even with market-based measures and trading -- which could result in relatively more cost-effective approaches -- great harm could be done to the world's economy and jobs if the targets and timetables are too stringent. The American people have the most to lose under drastic energy cutback plans. Greenhouse gas emissions caps and cuts will put the U.S. on an energy diet. To return U.S. emissions to 1990 levels by 2010 would require a more than 20% cut in energy use. A proposal by the European Union to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 15% by 2010 would mean the U.S. would have to cut energy use by more than 30%." []

The economies of the Western World are largely based upon investor confidence in future profit earnings of private companies. Wall Street is especially sensitive on this issue of profits. Any factor, large or small, are reacted to by investors, and have been responsible for extremely wild swings of the Dow Jones Average.

If Wall Street suddenly learned that all energy costs in this country were going to go up because energy consumption must be reduced by 20%, absolute panic would ensue. Everyone would know that such a steep reduction in consumption would result in price increases far greater than 20%. They would know that companies could not increase retail prices by as much as the cost increases, because the consumer would refuse to pay the increase. Therefore, the bottom line profits of most companies in this country would be either dramatically reduced or eliminated altogether. Companies would immediately announce layoffs, which would produce a "ripple effect" all through the economy.

Tremendous sell-offs of stocks would immediately occur, driving the Dow Jones down as rapidly and as far as the stock panic of 1929 and 1931. That sell-off produced the Great Depression; this type of sell-off would also produce a Great Depression.

As Gail McDonald, President of the Global Climate Coalition, stated on June 18, 1997, "President Clinton has a unique opportunity in the coming days to demonstrate true leadership by encouraging the leaders of the G8 and representatives to the U.N. to carefully study the scientific and economic implications of any climate agreement before taking action. If he does not, he stands of the precipice of what may easily become the most economically devastating federal policy blunder of the decade." []

Mr. McDonald, you are right in what you say. This plan will produce the greatest economic disaster the world has ever seen. But, your vision is too limited, and too clouded. You need to understand that, when President Clinton proceeds with this insane plan, he will not be committing a "blunder"; rather, he will be fulfilling a deliberate plan that has, as its key goal, the destruction of the Western economies of the world, a destruction that will aid greatly in establishing the Global Government and Economy of the New World Order. This economic disaster will also greatly aid in providing the impetus for Antichrist to arise.

To reiterate, this is part of a deliberate plan, carried out by our Globalist leaders, to crash this economy. To think of it in any other terms is to not fully understand what is about to occur. And, I believe that Congressional leadership is silently supporting Clinton's action to go around Congress in this plan. Otherwise, we would be hearing great noises and threats against the President from Congress, perhaps even threats of impeachment. The very fact that we do not hear these pronouncements from Congress is a strong indication that Congressional leadership is quietly in support of this UN plan.

Mr. McDonald notes that there is protest from Congress. He says, "It's no wonder that more than fifty United States Senators have co-sponsored the 'Sense of the Senate' resolution introduced last week by Senator Robert Byrd, D-WV, and Senator Chuck Hagel, R-NE, calling on President Clinton to refrain from signing any international climate agreement that does not apply to all nations of the world equally. The proposals currently under consideration by the United Nations do not." [Ibid]

While this action carries with it the surface appearance of solving the problem, it not only does not "solve" the problem, it is absolutely bone headed thinking. O.K., Mr. McDonald, if the President agrees to insist that all nations of the world share equally in this cutback of greenhouse gases, will that make the economic disaster in the Western World any less of a disaster? Of course, not!! The disaster will be every bit as severe. In fact, most of the Developing Nations have enough of a rudimentary economy that a severe increase in energy prices would impact them far less severe than it would the Western World. He who has less to lose, loses less! Right?!! Of course.

Finally, do not be deceived that the 20% increase now proposed is going to be the end of the matter. Even if our economies weathered this increase, we would not be out of danger. These political leaders are strong proponents of "incrementalism", where increases are gradually increased, bit by bit, until the level of increase that they wanted in the first place is achieved. Remember, the Income Tax of 1913 was originally less than 1% of our income!

President Clinton might have boldly stated this plan of incrementalism, when he was quoted in the first statement, quoted at the beginning of this article. Listen again to the statement: "The parties agreed to periodically review the need to consider additional commitments." "Additional commitments" literally means that, if the original 20% energy consumption reduction and restrictions do not destroy the Western economies, they will increase the amount until destruction is accomplished!!!

The very fact that this UN Climate Control Plan is being proposed, and has been approved by our President, is confirmation that we are very close to the Global Government and Economy predicted in Revelation 13:16-18. This plan for Global Government and Economy is historically unprecedented, and was predicted only in the Holy Bible. Right behind this UN proposal is the predicted appearance of Antichrist. Coming as it is on the heels of so many other prophecies also being fulfilled throughout the world, we can only conclude that we should be looking up, for our Redeemer "draweth nigh" [Luke 21:28].

Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.

If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually. If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.

We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.

God bless you.

Return to [ Index of Free Radio Show Transcripts ] [ Currently In The News ] [ Meet Your Pastor ] [ Supporting Your Internet Outreach Ministry ] [ Cutting Edge Seminars On Tape ] [ Cutting Edge Book Store ] [ Freemasonry ] [ Newsletters Archives ]

Free Radio Transcripts Current News Book Store Support
Seminars on Tape Newsletter Archives Freemasonry Meet Your Pastor