Have you thought it odd that the Clinton team would suddenly and savagely attack the credibility of Starr who was appointed by Attorney General Janet Reno and a panel of 3 Judges? This is the oldest debate trick in the book: defend yourself by attacking the accuser, rather than trying to defend the indefensible details of the case.

The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!

Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!

Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.



NEWS BRIEF: "In private, Clinton raging about Starr: In addition to being personally furious at the independent council, the president believes Starr is 'dangerous', sources say", by Bob Woodward and Peter Baker, The Washington Post, reported by The Providence Journal Bulletin, March 1, 1998, p. A-1, 7.

"WASHINGTON -- The goal, President Clinton has said, is to show up for work each morning and focus on the job. And so in the midst of the worst crisis of his career, he goes about his business with an air of public calm -- planning possible war one moment, touring disaster sites the next, even escaping to a ski resort this weekend with the family."

This first paragraph alerted me to the fact that this article was not an objective piece of journalism, but was nothing more than an apologetics article written to defend Clinton. Further, it was written by one of the heavyweights of the Journalism, Bob Woodward of the Nixon Watergate scandal. You remember Bob Woodward? He was one of the reporters who broke the story about Nixon's guidance of the White House cover-up; Woodward was able to get his scoop because he had supposedly discovered a deep mole in the Nixon office who kept feeding him with the information he needed to drive the investigation straight to the top. When Nixon resigned, Woodward was one of the major reasons. Therefore you would expect that Woodward would be tough as nails in getting at the truth about President Clinton. But, this article proves otherwise; it is simply a warm and fuzzy story designed to foster the notion that Clinton is a superb Chief Executive being unduly harassed by a prosecutor that is stepping outside legal boundaries to "get the President".

Back to this article: "But behind closed doors, in emotional moments of candor with confidants, Mr. Clinton is in a 'profound rage' these days about the investigation into his relationship with Monica S. Lewinsky, according to associates. Despite appearing unperturbed in public settings, they said, the president privately seethes that independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr is a 'very bad guy' and 'dangerous'. After years of being scrutinized on so many fronts, from his Arkansas business deals to the death of his friend, Vincent Foster, and now even to his sex life, Mr. Clinton has concluded that Starr is engaged in a moral crusade ... There is, said one friend, 'a sense of victimization'. It is 'not necessarily rational', said another .... There's genuine concern, even if it weren't him in the cross hairs ... that Ken Starr represents danger in American life." [Page A-1, 7]

Now, we see the picture we are intended to see, don't we? The American people believe President Clinton is a "victim" of Kenneth Starr specifically, and of the "Far Right Wing Conspiracy" generally. This is truly the era of "victimization". No one wants to take personal responsibility for any of their actions; therefore, everyone slips immediately into the "I am a victim" defensive posture whenever they find themselves facing any kind of trouble for their actions. Thus, President Clinton will find easy and ready acceptance on the part of the average American when he claims he is just a "victim" of Prosecutor Starr.

From the beginning, the Illuminati had a very definite plan in dealing with anyone who might discover their Plan for global conquest, and attempt to educate the public. Rather than trying to fight back against the facts in the matter, the Illuminati decided to just launch a personal attack against the accuser. In Debate Class in college, I learned also that you cannot defend the indefensible; certainly, the Plan to abolish all national entities [Nations], replacing them with a global government, is indefensible. The part of the Plan which envisions the most Absolute Dictatorship in world history, is indefensible. The part of the Plan which calls for the forced and immediate reduction of 66.6% of the world's population, is indefensible.

Therefore, whenever a person or organization discovers your Plan and sets out to inform and warn the public, launch an attack on the person, or the organization, on a personal basis. Find out if that person who is accusing you has some kind of "skeleton" in his or her closet. Find out if they have ever been convicted, or even accused, of some kind of crime. One of the favorite tactics is to create a false story in a minor paper and then have major publications "discover" the story and quote it as source for their coverage. Thus, the false story gets immediate and national coverage. Probably the most often used "source" in today's public arena is the non-source, "Unidentified sources".

Remember the three principles of the Illuminati, as we discussed in NEWS1154, "Bad News Designed To Discourage Us".

1) They control the Press. "In the hands of the States to-day there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing out requirements supposed to be indispensable ... and to create discontent." [Protocols Of The Learned Elders of Zion", Protocol No. 2]

2) The Illuminati planned to create an inferior education system for the masses of the people. This education system would be "an education which does not correspond with the work which individuals are called upon to do. After a thorough study of this knowledge, the peoples will ... blindly believe things in print ..." Doesn't this precisely explain our educational system today? People are being "trained" in knowledge they know they will never use when they get out of school. Further, kids today are not being trained in the principles of critical thinking skills, so that they really do believe that anything written in print, especially if it comes from their Government, is true.

3) People "have accepted words for deeds, for they are content with a show and rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance." Again, this is so sadly true of our citizens today. We elect politicians who boldly refuse to honor their major and minor campaign pledges, but then turn around and reelect them anyway!

When you add these three principles together, you get the Clinton/Starr fiasco today. When the story broke about the President and Monica Lewinsky, Clinton seemed taken aback at first, and tentative, as though he was not sure how to handle the situation. However, a few days later, after meeting with his advisors, Clinton moved to the attack. He and his collective leadership moved simultaneously on several fronts:

1) Clinton was immediately portrayed as a "victim". His victimizers were Lewinsky and Starr, both of whom were his accusers. Lately, Clinton has let up on Lewinsky, but not until he had savagely attacked her credibility. I will never forget the initial response from one of the White House staffers who was asked about the truthfulness of the allegations that the President had had a sexual affair with Lewinsky. "Of course not", said the staffer. After all, you have to understand that Lewinsky weighs 200 pounds, said the staffer. If I were Monica, I would feel great betrayal by those in the White House.

2) Clinton was also portrayed as a victim by Dick Morris, the former media advisor, who resigned amidst his own sex scandal. Morris was reported to be coming back on Clinton's staff; then, the next day, he was on Talk Radio in California, being interviewed. In this interview, Morris said the President was a victim because he was not getting sex from the First Lady. And, Morris intimated that the First Lady was not giving him sex because she was rumored to be a lesbian! Thus, we are told that Clinton should be expected to get sex wherever he could find it, because he is man of great libido, and was very attractive to women, both personally and because of his high office. Of course, this false line of reasoning is also totally immoral, as it seeks to absolve Clinton for any personal responsibility in the matter. This line of reasoning is straight out of Hell, for it excuses behavior that is forbidden in Scripture.

As incredible as this scenario sounds, I believe it played well with the people who comprise our society today. After all, our citizens today live their lives according to the same sexual standards exhibited by Clinton, or they fantasize these kind of lives. If most of these type of people were being truly honest, they would admit that they kind of admire the President for his libido, and his way with women. Many women, if they were also being honest, would admit that they would have loved to be in Monica Lewinsky's place. This is really spiritual sickness.

3) The First Lady immediately went on the attack, appearing on morning news TV talk shows. She "stood by her man". Thus, many people felt that, if the First Lady was not concerned, or convinced, they should not be concerned or convinced either.

But, the idea that Independent Prosecutor, Ken Starr, should be so savagely attacked strikes a disconcerting chord in me and most other thinking Americans. After all, Starr is a Liberal Republican who is closer to Clinton politically than to us Fundamental Conservatives. We have always considered Starr to be a stalking horse for Clinton, anyway. After all, consider Starr's "investigation" into the "suicide" of Vincent Foster. Conservative talk show hosts, beginning with Rush Limbaugh, have done an excellent job in detailing the many facts which mitigate against a rational or legal conclusion of a suicide.

Yet, after "investigating" Foster's death for several years, at a cost of many millions of dollars, Starr concludes that Foster's death was a suicide. The Accuracy In Media, Inc., writing in their October A&B, 1997, newsletter, describes some very interesting facts concerning Starr's final report to the judges on the Foster death. "Kenneth Starr's report on the death of Vincent W. Foster, Jr., is intellectually dishonest. He has suppressed irrefutable evidence that proves the falsity of his conclusion that Foster killed himself in Fort Marcy Park, employing the old lawyer's trick of not discussing the evidence against his client that he cannot refute. In this case, the three-judge panel that appointed Starr was presented with crucial evidence that Starr had suppressed. Patrick Knowlton, a key eyewitness in the Foster case ... requested through his attorney, John H. Clarke, that his comments be attached to Starr's report. The judges were not legally obliged to honor this request, but to Starr's dismay, they did so. They also rejected Starr's motion to reverse their ruling. This indicates that the judges recognized that important evidence had been omitted by Starr and that the public had a right to know what it was. Clarke's 20-page appendix mentions over 20 alleged flaws in the foster death investigation, some of which Starr's report addresses, but few of which it answers satisfactorily."

This "Aim Report" then catalogs many of these facts which Starr's office suppressed, much to the dismay of this eyewitness, Patrick Knowlton. You can visit the web site of the Accuracy In Media by going to for current articles.

My Daddy used to say, "Where there is smoke, there is fire", and I have found in my life that this statement is usually very true. In the case of the Foster death, enough news reports have been filed that cast doubt on the "official" explanation to generate a huge cloud of suspicion that warn of a huge fire underneath. I believe history will record the same lack of public believability in the official explanation of Foster's death, including Starr's "investigation", that exists in the "official" version of the assassination of President Kennedy. Most Americans then, and now, disbelieve the official Warren Commission Reports, correctly understanding they were just a whitewash cover-up. Starr's "investigation" will prove to fall into the same category of unbelievability.

In fact, if these Foster reports from Accuracy In Media, are true, then Starr could actually be seen as deliberately shielding the President by suppressing evidence and issuing a report that will exonerate President Clinton. So, now, the question of the hour, is this: If Starr was deliberately acting as a legal shield, protecting Clinton in the Foster death case, then should we not expect he will act in the same shielding manner in this Lewinsky case? I think that is a logical conclusion. Starr could very well be protecting the President by acting as his aggressive legal attacker now. Then, after "due time" has passed, Starr's report exonerating Clinton will be more readily accepted by the American public, because it is coming from a man whom they perceive as being on a personal vendetta against the President. Clinton will be unchallenged once this exonerating report is officially released!

But, in the present situation, and to set up the public believability in a Starr report exonerating the President, Clinton and his subordinates are out on the public campaign trail. They are talking with any reporters that will put a microphone in their mouths, telling everyone that Starr is simply a partisan Republican out to "get" the President. Liberal lawyers suddenly popped up like weeds in Springtime, offering their opinions that Starr is overstepping his legal boundaries in a frenzied effort to nail Clinton to the wall. Whether any of this "legal opinion" is true or false is not the issue; the issue is that the public is buying it as true! Today, Starr is viewed by the American public as a great big, bad, Republican dude out to get the President impeached, even though the evidence is "flimsy" [perceived as flimsy].

If Starr is out to "exonerate" the President after an "exhaustive investigation", then why is he being so savagely attacked right now? Why are he and some of his staffers being investigated as to possible violations of the law several years ago? Why is Starr putting up with these savage attacks, while maintaining a stoic silence that seems to convince people even more of the validity of Clinton's attacks?

Because this is part of the plan, and Starr knows it well.

Starr is quite aware that these personal and professional attacks on him are part of the overall campaign to whitewash this entire affair. Starr is fully aware that such attacks have the effect of immediately diverting the attention of the public away from the President and Lewinsky.

Truly, the Illuminati are quite correct when they state that people think so poorly they have no right to govern themselves. Bill Cooper makes the statement attributed to an Illuminist paper, that should totally shock and alarm you. In fact, Cooper reports several ways in which the Illuminati thinks of the average American. Listen:

1) "This public behavior is surrender born of fear, laziness, and expediency. It is the basis of the welfare state as a strategic weapon, useful against a disgusting public." ["Behold A Pale Horse, page 60] Everyone should realize that the Big Government, which is so zealous to give money and benefits to tens of millions of people without them working for it [Welfare System] can and will, one day, turn on its recipients and totally annihilate them, or enslave them, or both. Welfare recipients, be forewarned: you are being encouraged to excess and dissipation now, in order to bring our entire civilization crashing down. Once your usefulness ends, your benefits will end, and your life, probably. You have been forewarned.

If you still do not believe me, listen to the original Plan for the Welfare State. In Protocol No. 6, great attention is given to deliberately stimulating the economy, so as to encourage speculation in the financial markets and individual greed. But, listen to their plan regarding the lower classes, and those people who are not discerning. "In order that the true meaning of things may not strike the goyim before the proper time, we shall mask it under an alleged ardent desire to serve the working classes ..." [Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol No.6]

How many times have you heard Clinton claim that he "knows your pain"? Now, you know the REAL reason he is claiming to know how you -- the small guy -- feels, and hurts. He does not really care this much about you; he is just following the Illuminist Plan to establish the New World Order, all the while convincing you that he has your best interests at heart.

2) "Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish: father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same." {Ibid, page 64]

3) "Human beings are machines, levers which may be grasped and turned, and there is little difference between automating a society and automating a shoe factory." [Ibid, page 62]

4) "The goyim are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock?" [Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol No. 11]

Please notice the arrogance and contempt these planners for the New World Order possess for the average citizen. They absolutely hate us, and they talk as though they look at us as food for the table, as steaks on the table. Indeed, they do. When you realize that the New World Order Plan calls for a two-thirds [66.6%] reduction in the population of the world, you know instantly that you have great grounds for concern.

In the meantime, President Clinton is paddling furiously, denying everything over and over again, in many times and situations. He has his minions out there also denying everything, even though most people are fairly convinced he did do it with Monica, and all these other ladies that keep coming out of the woodwork. Yet, this bold lying in the face of overwhelming evidence is part of the Plan, also. Listen:

"When we are in the period of the new regime, transitional to that of our assumption of full sovereignty, we must not admit any revelations, by the Press, of any form of public dishonesty ..." [Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol No. 12]

This increased wickedness on the part of the American people, and their leaders, is one irrefutable sign that the End of the Age is upon us. [2 Timothy 3:1-5] And, this particular sign is just one of many other signs that are occurring that tell us we are in the final moments of the Church Age. Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.

If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually. If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.

We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.

Finally, we would love to hear from you.

You can contact us by mail or email.

God bless you.

Subscribe to our email updates and messages from our editor by entering your email address below
Return to: