YOU ARE NOW ON

THE CUTTING EDGE

Copyright © 2006 Cutting Edge Ministries. All rights reserved. See full copyright notice below.

Former President Bill Clinton championed "Global Warming" greatly during his Presidency. This issue is one near and dear to the heart of the Illuminati, simply because it creates a scary -- but false -- worldwide scenario which will absolutely require a global government to "solve". Hollywood recently has come to the aid of the "Global Warming" community. Movies like "The Day After Tomorrow", "10.5", and "Apocalypse" have faithfully written a script which details the horrific damage supposedly made inevitable by "human activity" which is triggering "Global Warming".

Let us take a few moments to examine Al Gore's new documentary which is raising such alarm. Notice that this propaganda is blaming recent natural disasters on "Global Warming".

NEWS BRIEF: "Al Gore issues global warming wake-up call", Brietbart News, May 20, 2006

"Former US vice president Al Gore issued a sharp wake-up call over global warming at the Cannes Film Festival, warning the earth was facing 'a planetary emergency'. Last year's spate of natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina which devastated New Orleans in August were proof that global warming was beginning to wreak havoc due to global climate change, he said."

" 'Mother Nature has joined this debate with a very powerful and persuasive voice', Gore told a press conference after a screening of "An Inconvenient Truth," which documents his one-man crusade to raise awareness about the issue. 'Hurricane Katrina was a wake-up call for many people who had heard that the scientists were warning that the hurricanes would get much stronger. These and other phenomenon that have long been predicted are now coming to pass. The key to solving this crisis depends upon the people demanding action and not just of a president, but of the Congress as well."

Now, Gore gets specific about the kind of "action" he has in mind.

"He said he believed a huge opportunity had been lost in the aftermath of the September 2001 terrorist attacks to wean the United States -- the world's largest single producer of C02 gases -- off its dependence on fossil fuels .... Since his narrow defeat in the 2000 presidential elections, Gore has crisscrossed the country showing his slide-show to audiences in at least 1,000 places, entreating them to join the fight against global warming. I know from my experiences in the past, what I can most valuably do is to try to change the minds of the American people and people elsewhere in the world about this planetary emergency'. Until recently, he said, the people in the US had been living in a bubble of unreality." (Ibid.)

This is vintage Al Gore. Do you remember his other "planetary emergency" declaration, all the way back in 1992, with his book, "Earth In The Balance"? Let us revisit this book, for it contains some information which will surprise, and then enlighten, you.

Earth In The Balance

We have demonstrated many times in past articles the role environmental activism plays in the eventual implementation of the New World Order. There is no question that Satan is working in the hearts and minds of the proponents of the New World Order to bring about the last stages of the plan. Bill Cooper, in his book, "Behold A Pale Horse", shares this quote from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, which we have shared with you previously. This quote clearly shows how very close we are to the final implementation of the New World Order Plan; remember this final part of the plan was written in the late 1700's. (NOTE: Bill Cooper reprints the entire Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, which can be difficult to locate.)

These planners of the New World Order, writing over 200 years ago, were saying that the last step is for their speakers to create global problems of such supposed magnitude as to require a global solution. We are seeing this happening nearly every day in some way, such as our celebrations of Earth Day, where speaker after speaker rose to the platform to decry the state of the earth, blaming the United States for its destruction and crying out for the solutions to the supposed catastrophic conditions of the atmosphere, landfalls, rain forests, etc. Environmental activists point to four basic supposed problems that they claim are threatening our earth and our life as we know it.

1. Acid Rain -- The world's industrial nations, especially the United States, are being accused of contaminating the world's atmosphere with emissions from our factories. Supposedly, many forests are being killed by this acid rain. Scientists are debating the acid rain issue, and according to some studies, the earth has more forests than at any time in recorded history.

2. Cutting of Rain Forests, or Deforestation -- There is no question that Rain Forests in parts the tropics are being cut. This cutting disturbs the balance of nature, environmentalists claim, by decreasing the earth's ability to absorb carbon dioxide, and by destroying the habitation of many species. This, in turn, breaks down the vital food chain. However, this aspect is overblown, since rapid regrowth covers the deforested area over rather quickly.

These Rain Forests are not being cut at the rate that is being portrayed in the popular media, however, for if they were being cut at that rate, there would be no forest anywhere in a very short time.

3. Global Warming -- According to many environmental scientists, the average temperature of the earth is increasing. This warming is being caused by so-called "greenhouse gasses", such as carbon dioxide and methane that thicken the earth's atmosphere and do not release heat from the atmosphere into space. However, many scientists dispute that the earth is warming at all, but may, in fact, be cooling and entering a new Ice Age.

4. Ozone Depletion -- In addition to the "greenhouse effect", we are being told that the emitting of Chlorofluorocarbons or CFC's for short, are destroying the ozone layer in the atmosphere. Ozone is the chemical in the atmosphere that protects us from the ultraviolet rays of the sun. Each fall, the Ozone layer over Antarctica develops what is called a "hole". This hole closes after a short time. These CFC's, chlorine, freon, and other chemicals used in many of the products we use everyday, such as refrigerators, have caused this natural yearly event to increase in scope so that the hole is growing. And, according to NASA scientists, it takes longer each year to close. The result, we have been told, is the eventual destruction of the Ozone layer and the end of life on earth.

Remember, the Plan for the New World Order, quoted above, and written in the late 1700's, calls for the creation of such great problems which threaten mankind and which will convince people to allow the final implementation of this new system of world government. The fact that we see this manufactured problems now being boldly and loudly trumpeted demonstrates that we are very close to the end of the age.

Now, enter into this discussion, several books that discuss environmental issues, the most prominent of which has been written by then Vice-President elect, Albert Gore. This book is entitled, "Earth In The Balance". For the remainder of this program, we will examine this book in the context of its role in promoting the New World Order. Gore's avowed purpose in writing the book is to present himself to be a leader in responding to the challenge that he believes is presented by what he repeatedly calls a global crisis. The book is a cross between anecdote, scientific assertion written in a somewhat simplified manner, and proposals that will solve what he feels is the greatest problem that has ever faced the human race. From a stylistic point of view, Gore accomplishes his task brilliantly. He is the recognized leader on environmental issues in the United States, and his book has stirred many to agree with him that the future of the earth is literally hanging in the balance between habitable and inhabitable. In this sense, the book is truly one of the most significant books ever written. If Gore's analysis of our environment is accepted, the pathway to the New World Order will become a freeway, with no stoplights or speed limits.

Premise #1: A Global Environmental Crisis is a threat to all life on this planet.

Premise #2: There is a Global Environmental crisis today.

Conclusion: Our lives are threatened. This is the premise of Gore's new documentary; indeed, this is the radical premise of all Global Warming Chicken Littles.

We must look at the philosophical suppositions that form the foundation upon which the book rests. On page 62 of the book, Mr. Gore builds his case for a history of climate changes. He points to climate changes that he believes have occurred over millions of years, and he further believes that these climate changes have the agent for the development of man's social institutions. He says:

"Indeed, the succession of ice ages and warming interglacial periods between 1 million and 40,000 years ago, is believed by most historians to have provided the impetus for the development of rudimentary social organizations. The archaeological and anthropological records indicate that each time the ice retreated, the primitive peoples of the Eurasian land mass grew more populous and their culture more advanced".

Gore indicates his complete belief in evolution when he states, "human evolution itself was shaped by dramatic transitions in global climate patterns during the past 6 million years". On page 100, Gore asserts that it is from the ocean that the earliest life forms evolved. While much of what Gore says in his book is true, he rejects the notion of a personal God Who creates and sustains His universe. This rejection of God is the basis of Gore's entire argument. He believes that human life can completely disappear from the earth; yet the Scripture teaches that God will preserve this earth until the time of final judgment. While it is possible that God will use some of the natural disasters foretold in Gore's book as the means of judgment, God's judgment will be for sin and not the consequences of poor environmental management.

Gore's rejection of Biblical doctrine is most telling in his statements concerning Joseph in Egypt. He says, "Joseph's warning to Pharaoh to prepare for seven lean years following seven fat years reflects the new awareness of humankind of its vulnerability to changes in the weather patterns. In turn, when Pharaoh appoints Joseph, who interpreted the ecological meaning of Pharaohs dream, to oversee preparations for the lean years, his decision reflects the assertion by humankind of the power to anticipate, and prepare for climate fluctuations." (page 62).

This sentence is sheer propaganda nonsense, as it has no basis in either Biblical or historic truth. There was no "ecological meaning" in any of this story, as God simply brought the seven years of drought upon that entire region, so His power and glory could be plainly on display.

A second area that Gore deals with extensively in his book is the issue of Global Warming. He says:

"Global Warming is also a strategic threat. The concentration of carbon dioxide and other heat-absorbing molecules has increased by almost 25% since World War II, posing a worldwide threat to the earth's ability to regulate the amount of heat from the sun retained in the atmosphere. This increase in heat seriously threatens the global climate equilibrium that determines the pattern of winds, rainfall, surface temperatures, ocean currents, and sea level. These, in turn determine the distribution of vegetative and animal life on land and sea and have a great effect on the location and pattern of human societies."

Is global warming the threat Mr. Gore seems to believe it is? Contrary to Mr. Gore's statements that there is nearly universal agreement among scientists concerning the facts of global warming, there are a number of highly competent scientists that have differed publicly with the findings of the United Nations panel that predicted a 2 degree rise in temperature by the year 2025. These highly competent scientists are from such prestigious places as M.I.T., Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, the National Weather Service, and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, to name but a few. These scientists point out that weather data has been collected for 10 years by satellites. This data has been examined by NASA space meteorologists Dr. Roy Spencer and Dr. J.R. Christy, who reported their findings in the March, 1990, Science Magazine.

Their conclusion: "There is no obvious long-term trend; and anomalies during the first 5 years nearly balance those during the last five years."

For close to 100 years, temperature and precipitation levels have been recorded daily at thousands of stations worldwide. If any significant warming had occurred, these readings would show it. But, simply stated, they do not show any significant level of warming. Even global warming adherents recognize that there has only been a one-half degree Celsius change in global temperatures. Even this change in temperatures is highly questionable because the measuring stations are not evenly distributed around the globe. They are located on only 30% of the earth's surface. The satellite data is much more reliable. A damaging flaw in the global warming theory is found in the lack of temperature rise when the levels of carbon dioxide were at their highest. Gore himself admits that the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere has increased 25% since World War II. If the global warming theory were correct, then there would be an accompanying temperature rise, and there is none.

Commenting on the unsubstantiated claims about carbon dioxide, the University of Virginia's Dr. Patrick Michaels adds, "It's pretty apparent that the lion's share of the warming occurred before the lion's share of increases in carbon dioxide emissions. There are only so many things that can go against a simplistic theory before one has to admit that it is simplistic".

Gore's Proposed Solution

Now that Albert Gore has defined the problem as he sees it, what does he intend to do about it? This is a critical question, because Gore is the next Vice-President of the United States. Gore proposes several actions:

1. Stabilize the world's population. He specifically mentions Birth Control in developing countries. But, many New Age leaders have always defined the stabilization of the population of the world as also including Abortion on demand. Do not be deceived; Gore's plan will increase the frequency of abortion.

2. Gore proposes the rapid creation and development of environmentally appropriate technologies, especially in the fields of energy, transportation, agriculture, building construction, and manufacturing. This is not an unreasonable goal; however, on page 325, Gore proposes something which is not reasonable. He states that the internal combustion engine (your car) poses a greater threat than nuclear weapons to the future of mankind. One page later, he calls for the elimination of the internal combustion engine in favor of more energy efficient vehicles. While Gore exaggerates the harm caused by the internal combustion engine, a more efficient technology that replaces it is not undesirable.

Gore then speaks of sharing environmentally appropriate technology. This idea is simply a Redistribution of Wealth, a major goal of the New World Order. Sharing our technology could benefit this nation more than it harms it, because with the spread and usage of advanced technology produces modernization for every nation to whom this technology is given. These nations then can afford to purchase our exports. Once again, the goal thus offered is not a bad thing in a of itself. The problem that Gore does not seem to comprehend is that with the sharing of technology, the economic incentives to develop technology are diminished. Therefore, Gore and Clinton believe that it is the responsibility of Government to "invest" (using Clinton lingo) in private industry in order to produce the technology that Gore intends to share. When he says "share", he really means to give away.

In order for this approach to work, a central economic planning agency must determine which companies will be the recipients of the Research and Development money that Clinton and Gore want to give away. In short, this plan puts the Federal Government into the role of financing technology that private industry now finances. If you were listening carefully to the love retreat that passed for economic dialogue in Little Rock last week, you are aware that such central Governmental planning is exactly what Clinton has in mind. We are moving ever more closely to the synthesis between Capitalism and Communism, otherwise known as Fascism. Fascism is defined as that economic system in which Private Industry controls the means of production, but where the Federal Government controls who produces what merchandise, what quantities will be produced, and to whom it will be distributed. This is the new system which will control the world economy in the New World Order, because an elimination of international competition is essential to building a cohesive world system.

Doubt it not! The planned economy of the New World Order is Fascism.

3. Gore proposes that we should have a comprehensive and ubiquitous change in the economic "rules of the road", by which we measure the impact of our decisions on the environment. What Mr. Gore is referring to is a system of trade agreements predicated upon an adherence to ecological principles. This goal is noble and if everyone adheres to the agreement, the results will undoubtedly be positive. However, the problem is that such a system of rules will be unenforceable apart from international sanctions backed by military force. In our present geopolitical system, such enforcement is all but impossible to maintain. Too many nations still thumb their nose at the U.N., as did President Bush when he ordered Coalition Forces to invade Iraq on March 20, 2003. Until the U.N. gets overwhelming military enforcement capabilities, Gore's proposed system will go nowhere.

4. Gore proposes to negotiate and approve new international agreements that will embody the regulatory frameworks, specific prohibitions, enforcement mechanisms, cooperative planning, sharing arrangements, incentives, penalties, and mutual obligations necessary to make the entire plan work. This sounds suspiciously like a One-World Economy and Government. While Gore states that he is against a One-World Government on page 301, such a system cannot be far behind if this solution is adopted.

5. Gore proposes to better educate the citizens of the world about the environment. The big problem here is not the process of teaching, but its content. The world's citizens do not need misinformation about global warming and ozone depletion, especially young, impressionable minds. Nor does one need the refresher course in Darwinian Evolution that Gore presupposes in this book.

6. Gore wants to establish social and political conditions most conducive to the emergence of sustainable societies, especially in the developing world. Gore speaks of making these developing economies in the image of "responsible" governments like ours. The situation in Somalia is ample evidence of what can take place in politically unstable societies; yet, it is questionable as to whether our system of government and economy is an appropriate model for Somalia to emulate.

Gore calls this six-point plan a Global Marshall Plan, patterned after the plan that rebuilt Europe after World War II; of course, we have shown in previous programs that this Marshall Plan was the first massive instance of a "Redistribution Of Wealth", and was preparatory to even more massive redistributions once the world enters into the New World Order. Since America funded the original Marshall Plan, Gore finds it essential that we fund this new one, as well. While this plan will probably have little effect on us as Christians specifically, it affect the world's economy drastically, with tragic results, thus paving the way for the One-World Government which Gore argues against. Gore's Marshall Plan has lofty, and generally lofty goals. The problem is that the means of achieving them will move the world the final distance into the New World Order.

Gore then makes a statement which seems ludicrous on the surface, but has great implications for us today. Listen:

"We now know that their [internal combustion engine] cumulative impact on the global environment is posing a mortal threat to the security of every nation that is more deadly than any military enemy we are ever again likely to confront." [P. 325; "Earth In The Balance"]

When Gore penned these words in 1992, Russia still had over 20,000 nuclear warheads aimed just for us, China was working feverishly to develop her own nuclear bombs, and we were starting to hear the drumbeats of terrorism against our cities using a variety of weapons, including nuclear bombs. Thus, Gore has just stated that the internal combustion engine is more of a threat to this planet than nuclear weapons!

On the next page, [Page 326], Gore proposes to eliminate the internal combustion engine altogether! The Kyoto Accords would accomplish this draconian goal through severe regulation that would stifle the economy on the one hand while driving prices so high no one could afford to buy the products and services that keep this Industrial Civilization humming. Returning to an agricultural economy is the ultimate goal.

The answer for this worldwide global warming is the Kyoto Accords, which will destroy any Industrial Civilization economy which fully implements its provisions. We do not have the time nor the space to discuss Kyoto here, but we encourage you to read our article on this subject, NEWS1125 and NEWS1126.

Without even looking at Gore's new documentary, we are positive it strikes the same environmental fears as did "Earth In The Balance". While the science is shoddy, and the conclusions are irrational, this warning does sound an awful lot like the goal about which Bill Cooper warned -- "When we come into our kingdom (New World Order) our orators will expound great problems which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring the world, at the end under our beneficent rule." (p. 303).

Bill Clinton Jumps On The Gore Bandwagon

NEWS BRIEF: "Clinton says must 'get off our butts' to stop warming", By Pat Jackson, My Way News, May 20, 2006

"AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) - Former President Bill Clinton said on Saturday global warming is a greater threat to the future than terrorism and that the United States and other countries must 'get off our butts' and do something about it ... [he] said the United States must pursue policies that make 'more partners and fewer enemies' and use 'institutionalized cooperation' before there is catastrophic damage from global warming ... 'Climate change is more remote than terror but a more profound threat to the future of the children and the grandchildren and the great-grandchildren I hope all of you have', Clinton said.

"During Clinton's administration, the global Kyoto Protocol to curb the release of greenhouse gases was created but the Bush administration has rejected it on grounds it will hurt the U.S. economy. 'I think we should be in the Kyoto climate change system', Clinton said. 'We can't solve global warming or any other problem in the world you can mention that amounts to a hill of beans by ourselves'. The United States is considered the largest emitter of the 'greenhouse gases' blamed for global warming. President George W. Bush has said that global warming may be occurring but its cause is not clear. Generally, it is believed that the burning of fossil fuels is the primary cause of climate change."

Let us now speak of the "opposition" by President Bush to the Kyoto Accords. The Mass Media image painted for President Bush to maintain in public is that he is against the Kyoto Accords and really does not believe that Global Warming is a proven proposition. Such a position sits well with the President's Conservative supporters. Listen to a current news story as the President is responding to Al Gore's new documentary.

NEWS BRIEF: "Bush Snubs Gore Film on Global Warming", Brietbart News, May 22, 2006

"Is President Bush likely to see Al Gore's documentary about global warming? 'Doubt it', Bush said coolly Monday. But Bush should watch it, Gore shot back. In fact, the former Democratic vice president offered to come to the White House any time, any day to show Bush either his documentary or a slide show on global warming that he's shown more than 1,000 times around the world.

" 'The entire global scientific community has a consensus on the question that human beings are responsible for global warming and he has today again expressed personal doubt that that is true', Gore said in an Associated Press interview from France where he attended the Cannes Film Festival. Bush and Gore have had bitter disagreements about the environment and other issues..."

Is this true? Does "Bush and Gore have had bitter disagreements about the environment"?

That is the standard propaganda line -- but is it rooted in reality? After all, during a Bush-Gore debate in the 2000 election campaign, Candidate Bush stated that he and Gore were really not that far off on many issues. Does this include the view on "Global Warming"?

Please take a few moments to read NEWS1663, posted in June, 2002. Let us reprint here some excerpts.

Despite backtracking on the Kyoto Accords, Bush suddenly legitimized the Global Warming issue! This half-step opens the forbidden door just a crack, exactly as the Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan requires. Soon, Bush or his successor will have no trouble opening the door to Kyoto all the way.

What was Rush Limbaugh's response to this news? He called President Bush "George W. Al Gore"

Remember, Kyoto is designed to shut the Industrial Civilization down. Through extreme regulation, Kyoto would force Industrial Civilizations, first go into a tailspin, only to then drop like a rock. Prices for most goods would begin a steady rise, forcing the average consumer to cut back purchases of everything from autos to clothes and food. Soon, manufacturers would begin to lay off workers, and the economic spiral would be disastrous. Ultimately, the plan envisions our entire Industrial Civilization to be eradicated, replaced by an agricultural economy like that which existed 300 years ago!

Bush started nudging us in that direction in June, 2002.. Now, let us examine the news which prompted this outburst from "Mr. Republican" himself, Rush Limbaugh.

NEWS BRIEF: "Climate Changing, U.S. Says in Report", By ANDREW C. REVKIN The New York Times, June 3, 2002

"In a stark shift for the Bush administration, the United States has sent a climate report to the United Nations detailing specific and far-reaching effects that it says global warming will inflict on the American environment. In the report, the administration for the first time mostly blames human actions for recent global warming. It says the main culprit is the burning of fossil fuels that send heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. But while the report says the United States will be substantially changed in the next few decades ... it does not propose any major shift in the administration's policy on greenhouse gases. It recommends adapting to inevitable changes. It does not recommend making rapid reductions in greenhouse gases to limit warming, the approach favored by many environmental groups and countries that have accepted the Kyoto Protocol, a climate treaty written in the Clinton administration that was rejected by Mr. Bush."

American Conservatives did not elect George W. Bush to officially declare that the bogus Global Warming issue was real! They have long known this Global Warming was based on fraudulent science, and that it was being used to create a global crisis in order to justify a global government. Conservatives knew Bill Clinton and Al Gore were firmly entrenched in the Global Warming issue, and that is one reason they did not vote for Gore for President.

As we stated earlier, Rush Limbaugh was so upset over President Bush's sudden reversal on his position of Global Warming that he called President Bush "George W. Al Gore".

Little did Rush know that this is the case across the board concerning President Bush's actual policy. His Gay-Lesbian policy is identical to Clinton's -- NZ1086.

Additionally, President Bush has given this country runaway deficit spending and bloated government bureaucracy, both betrayals of Conservative trust.

Conclusion

This sudden Democrat interest in Global Warming does come at the same time President Bush and the Republicans are sinking quickly in the polls. If the Democrats take control of the Congress in this year's election, and if they win the Presidency in 2008, the world may see a Democrat president who plunges this country into the abyss of the Kyoto Accords.

And, if Hillary Clinton is elected President, we will really see such an emphasis. Remember the axiom: if the Illuminati wants the emphasis during a 4-year or an 8-year Presidential Cycle to be on foreign affairs, they cause a Republican to be elected; but, if the emphasis is to be on domestic affairs, they cause a Democrat to be elected.

Implementation of the Kyoto Accords on the American economy would most definitely be a domestic decision.

We shall just have to wait to see how all this plays out, but it does seem that the propaganda machinery in cranking up in the Democrat Party on Global Warming issues.

Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

Become a Headline news subscriber HERE.