"A Church For Atheists"
Raiders News Network, Tom Horn
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
"“It is hard to think of any other profession which
it is so near to impossible to leave.” That is the judgment of Richard
Dawkins, perhaps the world’s most famous living atheist, as he welcomes
unbelieving pastors to join the Clergy Project, a group designed to help unbelieving
pastors make their way out of the ministry. Apparently, some are not moving
out very fast.
Dawkins explains that the Clergy Project “exists to provide a safe haven,
a forum where clergy who have lost their faith can meet each other, exchange
views, swap problems, counsel each other — for, whatever they may have
lost, clergy know how to counsel and comfort.” Dawkins, who once held
one of the world’s most coveted academic posts, has now reduced himself
to addressing small gatherings of atheists and celebrating a motley crew of
pastors who have abandoned the faith — even if some have not abandoned
their pulpits.
The Clergy Project’s own statement is even more blunt, describing itself as “a confidential online community for active and former clergy who do not hold supernatural beliefs.” Most people, believers and unbelievers alike, are no doubt in the habit of thinking that the Christian ministry requires supernatural beliefs. That assumption is what Richard Dawkins and the Clergy Project want to subvert. More precisely, they want to use the existence of unbelieving pastors to embarrass the church and weaken theism.
This past Sunday, The New York Times Magazine told the story of
Jerry DeWitt, once a pastor in DeRidder, Louisiana and later the first “graduate”
of the Clergy Project. He is now the executive director of a group known as
Recovering from Religion, based in Kansas. DeWitt told the magazine of his struggle
as an unbelieving pastor. “I remember thinking,” he said, “Who
on this planet has any idea what I am going through?”
As the story unfolds, DeWitt tells of being the pastor of a Pentecostal church.
What readers will also discover, however, is that even by the time he assumed
the pastorate, DeWitt “espoused a more liberal Christianity.” Though
he never earned a college degree, he educated himself by reading authors such
as Carl Sagan, an atheist astronomer, and Joseph Campbell, a proponent of the
mythological. Later, he read Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins, key figures
in the New Atheism. By the time he had read Dawkins and Hitchens, “even
weak-tea Christianity was becoming hard to follow.”
When he found that he could no longer pray for his own parishioners or preach a coherent message, DeWitt resigned, preaching his last sermon in Cut and Shoot, Texas in April 2011. Now he travels the country organizing Recovering from Religion local chapters and working with the Clergy Project.
The magazine also told of Teresa MacBain, once a Methodist preacher in Tallahassee, Florida and now another trophy of the Clergy Project. The magazine simply states that MacBain “resigned from her pastor’s position in Tallahassee and went public as an atheist.” That is a very strategic example of under-reporting the story. As National Public Radio reported, MacBain first told just about everyone but her church of her atheism.
“I am currently an active pastor and I’m also an atheist,” she said. “I live a double life. I feel pretty good on Monday, but by Thursday — when Sunday’s right around the corner — I start having stomachaches, headaches, just knowing that I got to stand up and say things that I no longer believe in and portray myself in a way that’s totally false.”
Of course, she didn’t have to say such things at all. She could have resigned and spared herself and her church the hypocrisy. MacBain told NPR of her experience with mounting doubts, and then of her “eureka moment” when she realized, “I’m an atheist. … I don’t believe.”
On March 26, 2012, she stood before the American Atheists convention
in Bethesda, Maryland and told the 1,500 attendees, “My name is Teresa.
I’m a pastor currently serving a Methodist church — at least up
to this point — and I am an atheist.” As NPR reported, the crowd
hooted and clapped for more than a minute.
NPR and The New York Times Magazine attempt to portray MacBain and DeWitt as
victims. MacBain presents herself as unnerved by the fact that her church fired
her and did not appreciate her declaration of atheism behind their backs at
a convention hundreds of miles away.
The Clergy Project and similar efforts are rooted in a 2010 study
undertaken by Daniel C. Dennett and Linda LaScola of Tufts University. Dennett
is one of the major figures in the New Atheism. He argues that belief in God
once served an important evolutionary purpose, but does so no longer. Religious
belief, he argues, is a vestigial remnant of our evolutionary past that modern
humanity must overcome. He is hardly a neutral and dispassionate observer.
Nevertheless, Dennett and LaScola conducted and published a study known as “Preachers
Who Are Unbelievers.” In that study, a small sampling of atheist or unbelieving
pastors was considered, along with five representative profiles. These pastors
clearly are not believers, at least in any orthodox or recognizably Christian
sense. They spoke openly and in considerable detail about their unbelief, with
the ministers explaining how they had abandoned any confidence in biblical Christianity.
Why didn’t they just resign? Most shockingly, some openly
spoke of losing their salaries as the main concern. So much for intellectual
honesty.
Dennett and LaScola made a very interesting and important observation in their
research report. They acknowledged that defining an unbelieving pastor is actually
quite difficult. Given the fact that so many liberal churches and denominations
already believe so little, how is atheism really different? In the name of tolerance,
the liberal denominations have embraced so much unbelief that atheism is a practical
challenge.
In the words of Dennett and LaScola: “This counsel of tolerance creates
a gentle fog that shrouds the question of belief in God in so much indeterminacy
that if asked whether they believe in God, many people could sincerely say that
they don’t know what they are being asked.”
The Clergy Project gets to the point more concisely, defining its membership
as “active and former clergy who do not hold supernatural beliefs.”
Nevertheless, this definition suffers from the same problem. Many liberal ministers
hold to no supernatural beliefs, but they also tenaciously hold to their pulpits
without admitting atheism.
The Clergy Project is a parable of our times, but it is also a
pathetic portrait of the desperation of many atheist and secularist groups.
They are thrilled to parade a few trophies of unbelief, but do they really believe
that these examples are serving their cause? They celebrate a former Pentecostal
preacher with no education, who was already a theological liberal when called
to his church, and who then educated himself by reading Sagan, Dawkins, and
Hitchens. Seriously?
The Clergy Project is a magnet for charlatans and cowards who, by their own
admission, openly lie to their congregations, hide behind beliefs they do not
hold, make common cause with atheists, and still retain their positions and
salaries. Is this how atheists and secularists groups intend to further their
cause? They are getting publicity from the media to be sure, but do they think
it will win them friends?
Ministers struggling honestly with doubts and struggles are in a different category
altogether. Doubt will lead to one of two inevitable consequences. Faithful
doubt leads to a deeper embrace of the truth, with doubt serving to point us
into a deeper knowledge, trust, and understanding of the truth. Pernicious doubt
leads to unfaithfulness, unbelief, skepticism, cynicism, and despair. Christians
— ministers or otherwise — who are struggling with doubt, need to
seek help from the faithful, not the faithless.
Christianity has little to fear from the Clergy Project. Its website
reveals it to be a toothless tiger that will attract media attention, and that
is about all. The greater danger to the church is a reduction in doctrine that
leaves atheism hard to distinguish from belief. And the real forces to fear
are those who would counsel such a reduction.