1. Hillary
Clinton is handing Donald Trump the election every
time she speaks in favor of mass immigration!
Americans
are sick and tired of virtually unlimited immigration.
NEWS BRIEF: "Blockbuster
Immigration Poll Demonstrates Americans Want Total
Revolution Against Mass Immigration",
Breitbart Poll, 31 July 2016
"New polling
data shows that it would be virtually impossible
for Hillary Clinton to win the general election
if the Republican nominee were able to frame the
immigration issue in populist terms that emphasize
reducing the overall amount of immigration into
the country and protecting jobs, incomes, and
benefits for the domestic population.:
Note the combination
of issues this unbeatable election rhetoric must
contain:
* Reducing the numbers
of immigration
* Protecting American
jobs, income and benefits for the domestic population
The average American
citizen is evidently becoming very aware of the
job-killing provisions of a flood of lower-paid
workers through easy immigration and from Free
Trade Agreements. If Trump can skillfully weave
these issues consistently in the General Election,
he may be the guaranteed winner of the White House.
"The poll shows
that instead of dividing Americans, immigration
is an issue where Americans have reached the consensus
that it is a problem, maybe the problem ... As
the polling data confirms, the most potent framing
of the immigration issue is to focus on the numbers
and scale of total immigration into the country,
and to present the American people with the choice
between more immigration and less immigration."
Here are some of
the most important findings of this poll:
* By a nearly 6
to 1 margin, U.S. voters believe immigration should
be decreased rather than increased."
* By a 25-to-1 margin,
voters believe that unemployed American workers
should get preference for a U.S. job rather than
a foreign worker brought in from another country."
* Sixty one percent
of voters believe that any politician, “who
would rather import foreign workers to take jobs
rather than give them to current U.S. residents,
is unfit to hold office.”
* Three out of four
voters believe the nation needs “an immigration
system that puts American workers first, not an
immigration system that serves the demands of
(political) donors seeking to reduce labor costs.”
* A majority of
voters (55%) disagree with Hillary Clinton’s
call to release illegal immigrants arriving at
the border into the United States and give them
a chance to apply for asylum."
* Roughly three
out of four voters— including nearly three
out of four Democrat voters— believe that
“instead of giving jobs and healthcare to
millions of refugees from around the world, we
should rebuild our inner cities and put Americans
back to work.”
Now that this poll
has provided the Republicans a strong winning
formula, are GOP politicians going to run hard
on these few specific issues? Did you realize
that the last time a President paused the rate
of immigration, the economic results were spectacular?
"In the 1920s,
the last time the foreign-born share of the population
reached a record high, then-President Calvin Coolidge
hit the pause button for roughly fifty years,
producing an era of explosive wage growth and
allowing immigrants already in the country to
assimilate."
This position is
one already proposed by Donald Trump!
New poll
indicates Trump may be unbeatable if he hammers
home this one simple Common Sense point: restrict
immigration from countries who harbor terrorists.
2.
Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan joins forces
with Hillary in attacking Trump's position on
immigration.
NEWS BRIEF: "Double
Agent: Paul Ryan Races to Media to Join Hillary’s
Attacks Against Trump", Breitbart News, 31
July 2016
"JANESVILLE,
WI — Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan
opted to join in on Hillary Clinton’s latest
attack against his party’s nominee. In recent
days, the establishment media has devoted a great
deal of coverage to Khizr Khan, a Muslim father
whose son died serving in Iraq and who spoke at
the Democratic National Convention. During his
DNC speech, Khan attacked Donald Trump for wanting
to curb the record-high rate of Muslim immigration
into the U.S."
"Following
the media’s practically round-the-clock
coverage of Khan’s attacks against Trump,
Speaker Paul Ryan decided to join in on the pile
on. Ryan issued a statement on Sunday in which
he, once again, disavowed the use of a religious
test for admitting foreign migrants."
There are two major
points to make regarding Ryan's attack on Trump's
immigration policies:
1) Trump did not
propose the points that Ryan is criticizing him
"In his statement,
Ryan did not mention that Trump has recently made
clear that his plan to curb Islamic migration
will focus on geography and regions. Nor did Ryan
mention that — as many, including Jeff Sessions
and Andrew McCarthy, have pointed out —
religious screening is, in fact, constitutional."
2) Ryan would rather
have at least four years of a disastrous Hillary
Clinton presidency than have a politically untested
Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
"... The argument
from the Khan family and their media boosters
seems to be that because their son died in Iraq,
and also happened to be Muslim, that the U.S.
is morally obligated to admit an unlimited number
of Muslim immigrants in the future with no examination
or scrutiny paid to their religious beliefs ...
Interestingly, as Gateway Pundit has pointed out,
the number of Muslim soldiers who have died in
Iraq and Afghanistan is the same number of those
who have been killed by Muslim soldiers in America
— Nidal Hasan and Hasan K. Akbar collectively
killed 14 American soldiers on U.S. soil."
At this point, Breitbart
News finally comes to the same conclusion that
Cutting Edge has been saying for years.
"... the central
pillars of Ryanism are very similar to the
pillars of
Clinton’s agenda."
Please take a few
moments to read our Headline News article, NEWS2555,
entitled, "2016 Election Special
Report: "Not a dime's worth of difference"!
Your view about politics in America today
will change forever.
Ryan is
the new 'Poster Child' for the reality that there
is no bottom line difference between Republican
and Democrat Parties.
Finally, Wisconsin
voters will be tested August 9 in a special election.
"Ryan will
face Wisconsin voters at the polls on August 9th.
Should Ryan win his re-election and Trump lose,
it is likely that — as Tim Kaine has predicted
— amnesty will be enacted within the first
100 days (of a Clinton Administration), the TPP
will be implemented, and criminal sentencing laws
will be reduced, potentially resulting in an increase
in the amount of violent crime and recidivism
in U.S. communities."
America is facing
a huge "make-or-break" election! Are
we going to show the Globalists that we are not
going to accept their plan for the world, or are
we going to rise up and reject these policies
which threaten our "lives, liberties and
the pursuit of happiness"?
British voters made
their choice a few weeks ago as they voted to
reinstate British national sovereignty by leaving
the European Union! American voters must now make
the same choice.
3. Women are the fastest-growing
segment of Gun Owners in America.
They are
really fed up with being easy targets for evil
men.
NEWS BRIEF: "Women
are Fastest Growing Group of Gun Owners in America",
58WDJT News, July 31, 2016
"You might
call it girl power. According to the National
Shooting Sports Foundation, women are the fastest-growing
group of gun owners in the U.S. ... 'The fact
of the matter, is we cannot depend on a third
party, be it our husband, our father, a police
officer, anyone else to protect us. We have to
take that responsibility on ourselves'."
Shooting class is
quickly becoming the new "Knitting Circle".
"So for women
like Letita Ivory, target practice has become
the new knitting circle, where women train for
a day they pray will never come."
What about the argument
that, if a woman arms herself with a pistol, she
is likely to have a stronger male assailant take
it from her? That may be true, but are you ready
to argue that anyone is safer if attacked if they
have no gun, versus the possibility that their
gun may save their life? Even men carrying a gun
might have it seized by an assailant, so that
argument does not hold up under scrutiny.
Let us hear the
testimony of a New York public school teacher
who found herself going through a lockdown at
her school.
NEWS BRIEF: "NY
Teacher: How a Lockdown Changed My Mind on
Guns in School", American Thinker,
July 29, 2016
"The 'gun violence'
and Sandy Hook speakers at the Democrat Convention
reminded me of a recent event that took place
in my own school. Toward the end of the school
year, an announcement came over the loudspeaker
that I had never heard: 'we are in lockdown. This
is not a drill'. A teacher stuck her head in my
classroom. 'Lockdown'."
"After a minute,
I wondered what I would do if this was not a false
alarm. What could I do? The door is wood with
a glass window. Could someone kick it in? Could
he crack the glass and open the door? Maybe. Then
what? But it was too soon to worry. It was probably
a false alarm ... I thought about our location.
Second floor, right next to the center hall staircase.
Sixty little eyes watched my face, and I promised
myself that they would see a brave face. "
"Three minutes
passed, and I reminded myself that I was safe
at work ... I almost hated myself for giving them
what could have been a false sense of security.
Though I resented feeling defenseless, my main
concern was protecting in the event of the unthinkable.
My heart sank as I realized that I couldn't."
"I started
to wonder how long it would take for the cops
to arrive. Would it matter? Somebody had called
the cops, right? "
Studies have repeatedly
shown that police cannot arrive in time to stop
bloodshed if the attacker moves quickly. Why haven't
school shootings like Sandy Hook resulted in parents
and school authorities and the police and politicians
demanding that teachers be able to carry guns?
Rather, we are so easily influenced by the Mass
Media and government pronouncements that too many
people actually believe the solution is to further
prevent victims from defending themselves.
At this point, this
very frightened school teacher had a most common
sense idea.
"At that crucial
moment, it occurred to me that the only way for
me to have even a chance of protecting myself
and my children against an armed intruder was
with a gun... I realized that only we can protect
ourselves in the event of the unthinkable. We
have a right to self-defense, but if we don't
have the right to the guns, then the right to
self-defense is theoretical. The fact is that
no matter what we do or how many laws we pass,
our schoolchildren are still vulnerable, even
in a city with the toughest gun laws around."
Amen!
"I wondered
as I sat alone in my car driving home later that
day: since gun laws will stop no motivated criminal,
why do they really want us defenseless?"
The answer to this
most important question can be found on the back
of your One Dollar Bill. Since 1791, our government
-- both Republican and Democrat -- has been single-mindedly
driving to the "NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM"
system, which translates to "New World Order".
Since this type
of system is an Absolute Dictatorship, citizens
have to be persuaded to surrender their guns;
no dictatorship in history has ever been able
to take power if the citizens have private guns.
Are you ready to
accept the truth?
HEADLINE
NEWS ANALYSIS
