No mystery in American history is ever solved because the actual facts of each
case never reach the public for adequate examination and resolution. I mean,
we still haven't solved the questions of who murdered Presidents Zachary Taylor
and Abraham Lincoln, never mind who killed the Kennedy brothers or Martin Luther
King.
And this likely will be the fate of the investigation into the tragedies of
September 11, 2001 " we will never learn who did what: who planned it,
who executed it, who made money off it " although we do have a pretty good
idea who is covering it up, since the perpetrators regularly embarrass themselves
in full public view with their endless expectorations of false statements and
lame lies.
The real reason these mysteries are never solved is not because of any coverup
by government officials or rich power brokers. The reason these mysteries are
never solved is because of the pathetic state of our news media, which are wholly
controlled by the very same men who commit these colossal crimes that injure
us all.
Most journalists have never told the truth about politics; they only are allowed
to say what their bosses let them say. And almost always, if the newspaper or
TV station is a big one, their bosses won't let them tell the truth about practically
anything.
This is no idle complaint, no sour grape cocktail.
We are prevented from acquiring the information necessary to live honest and
productive lives: prevented by our schools, which limit the spectrum of functional
data that shapes the way we think as we grow up; by our hallowed institutions,
which exist at the whim of power structures whose real workings we have little
cognizance of; and by the public utterances of people we consider heroes, whose
words may inspire us at the time they are uttered, but whose achievements, considered
from the perspective of history, often do not match the deeds that made them
admired in the first place.
Consider for a moment the historical perspectives ... of Franklin Roosevelt,
who supposedly brought us out of the Great Depression but now is better known
for manipulating geopolitics to get us into World War II by creating the conditions
that the led the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor.
Now, as we wring our hands while America morphs from beacon of liberty to the
most sinister oppressor of all people in the world, we come to another realization
" if we are mature and wise enough to understand the USA has always been
a militaristic machine, first taming a wilderness continent peopled by beings
we called savages, now conquering a world occupied by individuals we disparagingly
regard as inferior foreigners.
We come to understand that our prosperity is wholly dependent on conquest and
exploitation of those less alert than ourselves. That this beastly attitude
has been transformed into heroic legends is simply good public relations. Everybody
needs to feel good about themselves, no matter what they are doing. Thus America
has crafted for itself a history packed with glorious campaigns and noble efforts.
The trail of corpses this history has produced is seldom mentioned.
And thus it is with 9/11.
Many high officials of the current United States government clearly know who
planned and carried out the murderous attacks of September 11, 2001. The names
of the perpetrators are clearly available in the records of those agencies that
monitor stock transactions, specifically the "put" options bought
by as yet publicly unidentified individuals in the days immediately prior to
9/11, names kept secret by the confidentiality laws of bankers.
The sad fact is that these names are kept secret even though release of them
could shed cleansing light on the cynical murders of 3,000 Americans, 5,000
Afghanis and 10,000 Iraqis in the past two years. The secrecy of banking laws
trumps the necessity of bringing mass murderers to justice. It always has and
it always will. For the world is about money and exploitation, it is not about
justice and honor. In America especially, mass murder of innocents is not as
serious a crime as betraying financial trust, according to law.
So, many individuals associated with the U.S. government know full well who
is responsible for 9/11. But they will go to their graves with the secret, because
too much money has been made from the deception, and there is still a lot more
money to be made in the overzealous military response to a tragedy that was
devised for that very purpose.
And it's not merely those insider elitists who made money off their timely investments,
with full knowledge of the charade that was about to be played, who are the
killers.
As researcher Walter Burien has pointed out, the guilty parties are much
closer to home, and more well known than anonymous moneymen protected
by secrecy laws of their own creation. Burien's words paint an ominous picture:
"If you look at "WHO" was holding the majority of "SHORT"
derivative positions on the domestic and international stock index markets prior
to 9-11, and then reaped over a trillion dollars in profits within days from
the ensuing collapse of those physical markets, you will find in that group
who was responsible for 9-11. There is one problem in finding this out. That
being government controls the release of that information by the SEC and CFTC.
A small conflict of interest exists here, being that the results of that study
would show the U.S. Federal Government was holding the majority of the international
"SHORT" positions! The promoted airline stock option transaction that
most people have heard about in the news is truly minuscule chump change in
comparison.
"Yes, government is preparing for an uprising in this country. They need
to direct the public eye to a faraway enemy so that they can secure control
here. Greed has thrived within government circles. The result of that greed
has been obscene and the resulting damage to the morals and health of this country
in response is sickening.
"The results of the takeover of the American wealth has been done almost
exclusively on paper through manipulation of the legislature and the judiciary
over the last 60 years with the cooperation of the syndicated news media and
education. With the conquest being done by transferring the wealth on paper,
the consequences for the "takers" was virtually nonexistent!"
There you have real American history, not reported by any newspapers or TV shows.
So we know who perpetrated 9/11. We know the Muslim hijacker rap was just a
deception .... The deception also provided breathing space for the multinational
oil giants who seek to carve up the geography of the Middle East for their own
advantage. So a few thousand Americans and other assorted infidels had to die.
That's just the way it is in the real world, I'm sure Dick Cheney would tell
you.
Most intelligent Americans already know you can't trust what you see on the
TV news. But it's very important to point that out to your friends and neighbors
who think they can. If you base what you believe on what you see on TV, you
are guaranteed to be deceived.
From the perspective of the future, I see Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather, Peter Jennings
and Wolf Blitzer as stick figure puppets dancing on the strings of their masters,
mouthing false words scripted by drooling demons counting their money in advance
of their latest robbery.
How else can one explain the total absence of the most important issues to all
humanity on the TV news?
The most critical issue of the continuing massacre of innocents in Iraq "
and one tragically close-to-home for deceived Americans " is the impact
of radioactive ammunition on those who did not die in the high-tech bloodbath.
All who participated in that murderous charade face a guaranteed future of agonizing
disease and death from uranium poisoning, the sick legacy of cruel cynics making
money off the recycling of carcinogenic nuclear waste into armor-piercing ordnance.
We already know how this story goes from the first Gulf War. Three hundred thousand
American veterans sickened, ten thousand already dead. Servicemen's wives with
radioactive uteruses, American babies grotesquely deformed. Hundreds of thousands
of Iraqis crippled by cancer or born with burned-out brains.
The government and its media supporters deny a connection. Uranium poisoning
incidence recently reported much higher in Afghanistan, after the U.S. did its
nuclear raindance there. And yet to be discovered higher still in Iraq.
And not a single word about it on television. Anywhere. A sickening silence
they call American freedom.
The greatest case of treason in U.S. history is the massive silence of virtually
the entire power structure about the inside knowledge of what has come to be
known as 9/11, which was quickly followed by the equally treasonous demolition
of the U.S. Constitution known as the Patriot Act.
The deliberate standdown of the air defenses, allowing thousands of Americans
to be slaughtered for the crass purpose of abetting the takover of Middle Eastern
oil; the facile lies of leaders who say they didn't know it was coming yet produced
the names of the purported perps on a moment's notice; the billions made by
those who did know it was coming ....
That 9/11 was an inside job known and planned well in advance of this mind-crushing
assault on the world's senses is no longer just a crazed conspiracy theory "
it's a whole encyclopedia of provable facts, observable criminal behavior and
stonewalled investigations ... it is a certainty.
Yet not a single peep about any of it on TV. Instead, the evil Muslims who "hate
our freedom" are blamed, as we psychologically prepare our pampered populace
for an endless invasion of the Arab world.
It is the conversion of the world into an armed prison of masters and slaves,
and excuse to steal Islamic treasures on the trumped-up charge that they are
the enemies of the West. But don't count your blessings just yet: it's only
a matter of time before the plunderers aim their weapons inward toward the conquest
of the docile American citizenry.
For all the tragic epiphanies about how our faith in democracy and American
honesty is a completely manipulated illusion, there is something far worse to
contemplate. Suddenly, the view down this sociological well of hopelessness
is about to get a lot darker.
Because when you realize what's happening, you'll begin to understand that a
lot of key people " people you think you admire, seek out for guidance,
and try to support " people that you thought were working for us, working
for freedom, are actually working for them, and working for something other
than freedom.
It is the dark flowering of our worst nightmare, because it takes away our belief
in those who we thought were helping us.
The real tragedy of our wholly corrupt news gathering apparatus is that many
of those who appear to helping the cause of human freedom are actually preventing
it in a very subtle and deceitful way.
The recent flap between Mike Ruppert, crusading creator of the highly respected
From the Wilderness website, and Amy Goodman, crusading interviewer of the much-listened-to
radio program Democracy Now, is especially revealing as to the sublety of the
deception. Ruppert has consistently complained about harassment from the so-called
left media, which claimed he was a hysterical conspiracy theorist because he
asked embarrassing yet wholly evidence-based questions about the unanswered
questions concerning the tragic mystery and coverup of 9/11.
Let it be known now that Ruppert is one of the more conservative and respected
analysts of the 9/11 enigma. He refuses to speculate about what might have been
and instead concentrates on what is empirically obvious. Yet he has been the
target of ridicule and scorn from virtually all the left commentators, Goodman
and Nation columnist David Corn in particular, and the spectrum of all those
supposedly progressive magazines like Mother Jones and The Progressive, and
supposedly progressive websites like Common Dreams and Alternet, none of whom
will touch the 9/11 issue with a ten-foot pole ...
The best discourse on this whole subject of deception among news sources can
be found on the quality website questionsquestions.net, which contains a whole
series of articles about the Gatekeeper syndrome, and provides a new and valuable
perspective of which media outlets are telling the objective truth, and which
are likely not (i.e., virtually all of the popular left alternative choices)
...
The Gatekeeper series on questionsquestions.net, written by Bob Feldman and
Brian Salter, is a virtual checklist of how to tell the legit publications from
the phonies.
Feldman's "Alternative Media Censorship: Sponsored by the CIA's Ford Foundation,"
describes the deceptive dilemma millions of Americans face by trusting such
leftie icons as Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn and Norman Solomon, all of whom downplay
the 9/11 conspiracy angle and Israel's involvement in it.
"The multi-billion dollar Ford Foundation's historic relationship to the
Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] is rarely mentioned on Pacifica's DEMOCRACY
NOW / Deep Dish TV show, on FAIR's COUNTERSPIN show, on the WORKING ASSETS RADIO
show, on The Nation Institute's RADIO NATION show, on David Barsamian's ALTERNATIVE
RADIO show or in the pages of PROGRESSIVE, MOTHER JONES and Z magazine. One
reason may be because the Ford Foundation and other Establishment foundations
subsidize the Establishment Left's alternative media gatekeepers / censors."
In addition, Feldman asks: "Perhaps Amy Goodman should finally make full
disclosure of all foundation grants that either the Pacifica Foundation, WBAI,
Democracy Now, WBAI, KPFA, the Indymedia Centers, Free Speech TV, Deep Dish
TV, the Pacifica Campaign or the Downtown studio from which she broadcasted
in 2000 and/or in 2001 have received since 1992? "
Just from that information alone, you should be starting to perceive a pattern
and a reason why these shows and publication aren't treating seriously the very
credible notion that 9/11 was an inside job ....
Salter concludes the series with a question:"Is it likely that the Ford
Foundation would fund the kind of alternative media which would be inclined
to look deeply into the long-running control over US foreign policy exerted
by the private and secretive Council on Foreign Relations, given the fact that
the CFR counts among its funding sources the Ford Foundation and Xerox? Or would
the Ford Foundation more likely favor those who could be relied upon to toe
the party line that the CFR (and other elite policymaking NGOs like the Trilateral
Commission and Bilderberg Group) functions only as a stuffy intellectual debate
society, and that anyone who argues otherwise is a "paranoid nut"?
" .... Judging by the journalism being offered (and not offered) by Nation
magazine, FAIR, Pacifica, Progressive magazine, IPA, Mother Jones, Alternet,
and other recipients of their funding, the big establishment foundations are
successfully sponsoring the kind of "opposition" that the US ruling
elite can tolerate and live with."
Read the Gatekeeper series closely, and analyze what Walter Burien has to say
as well (while you can).
By noticing who the participants are, what they say, and how they're funded
" and what the implications are of that funding " most intelligent
people will conclude that two litmus questions exist in determining whether
stories are legitimate attempts to ferret out the truth, or sophisticated deceptions
designed to distract readers into peripheral issues that will actually lead
you away from the truth ...
Forewarned is forearmed. We will never find the right answers if we can't ask
the proper questions.
John Kaminski is a journalist who lives on the coast of Florida and is the author
of "America's Autopsy Report," soon to be published by Dandelion Books.