Cutting Edge Weekly Newsletter

Over 1,400 Articles Posted! Nearly 150,000 People Downloading A Salvation Page Per Year!

For A Cutting Edge Analysis and Recap Of Current Events Visit our Headline News Area

Saturday, November 11, 2006


Controlling The Human Mind

The Most Effective Method Ever Devised! YOU Are In Danger

This is THE Century for understanding the human brain and controlling the mind! Technologies have advanced relentlessly, under cover of government secrecy and National Security

Alexander Scourby KJV Audio Bible On MP3

Cutting-edge recording technology delivers a crystal-clear reading of God’s Word on only three CDs. Enjoy Stephen Johnston’s powerful narration of the King James Version accompanied by soothing background music—72 hours instantly accessible via MP3 device, computer, or MP3-enabled CD or DVD player.

Untold thousands of Christian churches across the world are abandoning Traditional Music in favor of Contemporary Christian Music

Churches have been deceived into thinking they have to become like the world in order to reach the world.
This music is causing divisions within the church and gradually turns the worshippers from a focus on Jesus to a focus on themselves.

Can We ROCK The Gospel?

Warning in a Christian music magazine to naive Christian lovers of "Christian Rock": "I'll bet you aren't aware of all the occultic propaganda in your record collections".

Does God endorse music of every kind? Can we 'cut and paste' secular rock music and 'Christianize' it in the process? Should the Christian Church unite in bringing Rock Music to the altar or should we unite in sending it to the bonfire?

Luciferian Transmutation!

The Coming Global Luciferian Mass And What It Means To You!

Once Antichrist arises, his False Prophet shall command the whole earth to undergo a "Luciferian Initiation", identical to the ritual an initiate undergoes to join a Satanic coven (NEWS1826). The entire population of the world is going to pass under the firm and complete control of Antichrist/False Prophet at this Luciferian Initiation.

This global conditioning process has started! Are YOU a victim?

Blood On The Altar: THE Elite Society Beyond Masonry!

What's Beyond Freemasonry? Author probes deeply into the sordid arena of "Ordo Templi Orientis" -- OTO - the higher, more secret society to which elite Masons "graduate" upward.

Key members of both the Left and Right wings of political parties throughout the world obediently serve this terrible Satanic master.

This great reference tool also comes with a FREE CD containing all the great tools that the Strong’s CD has PLUS the full text of the Expository Dictionary

KJV Bible on DVD - Deluxe Box Set - 3-Disc Set

Complete KJV Bible On DVD brings even more exacting features to millions of people every day. With superb Tony Awarding winning cast, inspirational music and dramatic sound effects, enhanced with digital sound, this beautifully narrated Bible by Steve Johnson creates an unforgettable multi-media experience
DVD even contains a Bible Challenge New Testament Facts Game!

Nave's Complete Word Study Topical Bible - 1,600 Pages

This study Bible, based on Nave's Topical Study Bible, lists over 6,000 main topics, with over 16,000 subtopics.

Special notes on the original language words of Scripture; Pronunciation guides and meanings are given for each proper noun; Informational charts including key verses and outlines are given for each book of the Bible. Charts of vital information, such as the prophets of Israel and the kings of Israel - And Much more!

Video Trailers

Listen to great Christian Music online in our Listening Center.

Sample our books before you buy.

Our Weather is Being Manipulated

Weather Warfare

 Special Offers

Award-Winning Documentary

VOLUME 2 -- "Riddles In Stone: The Secret Architecture of Washington, D.C."


For all pertinent information concerning this Pre-Publication Sale, click on this hotlink now.

--------- Inspiration For the Week------- "Waiting for the adoption." Romans 8:23

Even in this world saints are God's children, but men cannot discover them to be so, except by certain moral characteristics. The adoption is not manifested, the children are not yet openly declared. Among the Romans a man might adopt a child, and keep it private for a long time: but there was a second adoption in public; when the child was brought before the constituted authorities its former garments were taken off, and the father who took it to be his child gave it raiment suitable to its new condition of life.

"Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be."

We are not yet arrayed in the apparel which befits the royal family of heaven; we are wearing in this flesh and blood just what we wore as the sons of Adam; but we know that "when He shall appear" who is the "first-born among many brethren," we shall be like Him, we shall see Him as He is. Cannot you imagine that a child taken from the lowest ranks of society, and adopted by a Roman senator, would say to himself, "I long for the day when I shall be publicly adopted. Then I shall leave off these plebeian garments, and be robed as becomes my senatorial rank"? Happy in what he has received, for that very reason he groans to get the fulness of what is promised him. So it is with us today. We are waiting till we shall put on our proper garments, and shall be manifested as the children of God. We are young nobles, and have not yet worn our coronets. We are young brides, and the marriage day is not yet come, and by the love our Spouse bears us, we are led to long and sigh for the bridal morning. Our very happiness makes us groan after more; our joy, like a swollen spring, longs to well up like an Iceland geyser, leaping to the skies, and it heaves and groans within our spirit for want of space and room by which to manifest itself to men.

(C.H. Spurgeon, "Morning and Evening Devotions")

---------- This Weeks Hot News ----------

I. Democrats seized control of both houses of Congress in the tumultuous mid-term elections held November 7. Let us review the news.

NEWS BRIEF: "Democrats Complete Election Sweep of Congress", Breitbart News, November 8, 2006

"Democrats completed an improbable double-barreled election sweep of Congress on Wednesday, taking control of the Senate with a victory in Virginia as they padded their day-old majority in the House. Jim Webb's victory over Sen. George Allen in Virginia assured Democrats of 51 seats when the Senate convenes in January. That marked a gain of six in midterm elections ..."

If the Democrats are ever going to actually convict President Bush during impeachment hearings, they must have a numeric majority; if they only had 50 Senate members, then a party-line vote would cause Vice President Cheney to cast the deciding vote and he would never, ever vote to impeach Bush. Old "Independent" Senator Joe Lieberman from Connecticut could probably be counted upon to vote to protect the President, if that kiss on the lips from Bush following the Second Inaugural address is any indication; but, the Democrats now have 51 votes without Lieberman!

"With a handful of House races too close to call, Democrats had gained 28 seats, enough to regain the majority after 12 years of Republican rule and place Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California in line to become the first female speaker in history ... Democrats began the year with fewer seats than at any time since Herbert Hoover occupied the White House. Even the party leader, Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, mused aloud at one point that it might take a miracle to capture Senate control. Webb's win capped a banner election year for Democrats, who benefited from the voters' desire issue a searing rebuke of the status quo."

Political pundits, taking note of the historical unlikelihood the Democrats could ever sweep control of both House and Senate, set the stage for voters to be duly impressed with how historical the sweep turned out to be. Voters must be very, very mad at President Bush and all his policies, from the Iraq War to his leadership in the "War on Terror", to his handling of the economy, to his lack of moral authority. At least, that is the official story coming from the political "talking heads"!

"The war in Iraq, scandals in Congress and declining support for Bush and Republicans on Capitol Hill defined the battle for House and Senate control, with the public embracing the Democrats' call for change to end a decade of one-party rule in Washington. 'This new Democratic majority has heard the voices of the American people', said Pelosi, the California Democrat in line to become the nation's first female House speaker, adding that Americans placed their trust in Democrats. 'We will honor that trust. We will not disappoint'."

President Bush has just become one of the weakest Lame Duck Presidents in history!

II. Since February, 2004, Cutting Edge has been teaching that the Illuminati seems to be following a deliberate policy of discrediting President Bush thoroughly, which, if taken to its logical conclusion, means impeachment and removal from office. Obviously, if our understanding is correct, control of Congress must pass to the opposition party during the 2006 mid-term election - to the Democrats.

This is exactly what occurred, against all historic odds. Now, the process of discrediting the President can continue unabated through the next two years.

While Democrats are saying publicly they are not going to impeach President Bush, they are quietly making plans to do just that -- even Vice President Cheney can see the "handwriting on the wall"!

NEWS BRIEF: "A Bulk Rate on Printing Subpoenas?", David Swanson, Scoop News, 9 November 2006

"Chairman John Conyers Jr. Chairman Henry Waxman. Those titles will prove to be the most important outcome of yesterday's elections ... It's investigation and impeachment time."

Yes, I know that the newly designated Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, is on record several times, saying that the Democrats will not pursue an impeachment of President Bush if they won the election. And, I know that Democrat Party Chairman, Howard Dean, reiterated that pledge the day after the election.

I believe these comments are just for public consumption and carry little to no weight now that the election is over.

The reality is quite clear: Old-line "Liberal" Democrats are gunning for President Bush, as evidenced by the fact that extreme Liberals John Conyers and Henry Waxman are in line for chairmanships in the new Democrat-controlled Congress. Their animosity toward the Bush camp is the stuff of which legends are made. Just the fact that such men are going to chair Congressional committees should cause shivers of dread to flow along the backs of Establishment Republicans.

Remarks by Vice President Cheney reveal that Bush Republicans are well aware of the knives being sharpened for them.

"Vice President Cheney has already announced his plans to 'probably' refuse to obey a subpoena from Congress."

For nearly three years now, Cutting Edge has been saying that we believe the Illuminati had embarked on a deliberate campaign to thoroughly discredit Bush so they could discredit the principle of National Sovereignty and discredit genuinely Born Again Christians. An impeachment of Mr. Bush is only the logical outcome of this campaign; crucial to the success of that campaign is for the Democrats to defy historic odds and capture control of both houses of Congress. Now that this goal has been orchestrated, the knives can be prepared.

Remember in all this: both Democrats and Republicans are strongly committed to the advancement of the New World Order, and each member of each party realizes they are just acting out their prepared script. Do you remember the insightful wording of that Illuminist book, "The Armageddon Script"?

"Their script is now written, subject only to last-minute editing and stage-directions. The stage itself, albeit as yet in darkness, is almost ready. Down in the pit, the subterranean orchestra is already tuning up. The last-minute, walk-on parts are even now being filled. Most of the main actors...have already taken their roles. Soon it will be time for them to come on stage, ready for the curtain to rise.

The time for action will have come."

The first step anyone needs to take to understand the political process in America is to realize that there is "not a dime's worth of difference" between Republican and Democrat! Each party is equally supportive of the New World Order goal, and each party understands that they are merely actors in the struggle known as the "Dialectic", i.e., "Controlled Conflict Producing Controlled Change".

Once you understand this fundamental reality, you can comprehend all events in a more correct light; conversely, until you accept this important premise, you will continue to be in the dark regarding current events. For example, you will continue to be deceived until you realize there is no practical difference between the "Liberal" Ted Kennedy and the "Conservative" George Bush, or between the "Liberal" John Conyers and the more "Conservative" Dennis Hastert. All men are equally supportive of the New World Order Plan, and each one understands his role within the script.

Now, let us return to Swanson's featured article, for he makes some very interesting points concerning impeachment.

"In each of the nine cases in the past when one party has raised impeachment, that party has benefited in the next elections."

"In other cases when a party has failed to press for impeachment when the grounds for it were widely known, that party has suffered. (Remember Iran Contra?) And look at what just happened yesterday. Exit polls reported that voters by a margin of 62 - 33 percent voted on national, not local, issues. They voted for four, closely bunched, national reasons: corruption, terrorism, the economy, and Iraq. By 57 - 41 percent they disapproved of Bush's handling of Iraq."

The discrediting of President Bush seems well enough along, having conditioned the people to associate financial corruption, terrible leadership in the "War On Terror", the struggling economy, and the war in Iraq, with President Bush. The accumulative effects of so many news stories over the past six years has definitely had its conditioning effect!

At this point, let us review a shocking story about election manipulation by the Illuminati, from a former insider -- now Christian author, R.A. Coombe, whose materials we carry in our bookstore.

Christian author, R.A. Coombes, reports that, while he was serving as a regional advisor to President Reagan's White House re-election campaign staff in 1984, he discovered, to his horror, that elections are not only pre-determined, but that they are pre-determined years in advance.

NEWS BRIEF: "The A-O Report's Post-Election Analysis In Light of Biblical Prophecy", by R.A. Coombes
Alpha Omega Report, Wednesday, 08 November 2006

"I served as a regional advisor to President Reagan's White House re-election campaign staff in 1984. I also served as an advisor to the Republican Party in other election races that year in the Midwestern region including Congressional and Gubernatorial races plus local campaigns ... My primary expertise was media-relations and advertising. I was privy to a lot of insider processes involved in electioneering and therefore have a unique perspective on what goes on behind closed doors in the political realm. It was during this time that I came into contact with Illuminati operatives ... in 1985, I was informed by one particularly high-level insider with Illuminist connections that Vice President Bush would become the President in 1988 and following him in the future would likely be a young governor from Arkansas. I was told that after Bush, the Republicans would nominate Kansas Senator Bob Dole probably in 1996, who would likely lose to the Arkansas governor who would either run and win in 1992 or1996. I was told that 1996 would be the last 'honest' election. My contact predicted that in 2000 and thereafter technology could rig elections and eventually, America would fall under a dictatorship."

Doubt it not - the Illuminati has been controlling elections for a very long time, and has been planning since 1776 to eventually dissolve our wonderful, Constitutionally limited government with a dictatorship. We are just approaching that time now. The attacks of 9/11 were the catalyst.

III. Just 30 minutes after the newly designated Speaker of the House, Democrat Nancy Pelosi, suggested that, if President Bush wanted to signal his readiness to cooperate with the Democrats, he should fire Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, the President announced the removal of the Secretary.

Does this mean that Bush is prepared to cooperate with the Democrats from a dramatically weakened, and subservient, position?

NEWS BRIEF: "GOP asked for trouble", by David Broder, The State, November 9, 2006

"So Bush was simply acknowledging reality when he reversed himself and bade farewell to his controversial Pentagon chief. He said he made the decision in the final hours before Election Day. when he still believed he'd have a Republican Congress. But, in reality, it was announced less than half an hour after Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi had told her own news conference that firing Rumsfeld would be the clearest way for Bush to signal that the election constituted a call for a new policy in Iraq."

Therefore, does the forced resignation of Defense Secretary Rumsfeld mean that the Bush Administration will now take a new policy direction in Iraq? We believe that a new policy is underway, but that it was planned well before the election. In past Daily News Updates and newsletters, we reported that CFR's James Baker -- and long-time Bush Family friend -- had been commissioned by President Bush (Jr.) to study the Iraq War and the entire Middle East region, in order to recommend policy changes.

Therefore, changes are coming, and they could be dramatic! But, such changes were planned long before this election.

This next news story indicates that many in the Republican ranks are said to be very upset by the timing of Rumsfeld's firing.

NEWS BRIEF: "GOP furious about timing of Rumsfeld resignation", By Patrick O'Connor, The Hill, November 9, 2006

"Donald Rumsfeld's abrupt resignation from the Pentagon the day after Republicans lost both chambers of Congress has infuriated some GOP officials on and off Capitol Hill. Members and staff still reeling from Tuesday's rout are furious about the administration's decision to dump the controversial defense secretary one day after their historic loss ... Exit polling suggested that an overwhelming majority of voters disapproved of the administration's handling of the war in Iraq, and members and aides were frustrated with the timing of the announcement because an earlier resignation could have given them a boost on the campaign trail."

Now, we understand the reasoning behind their fury -- Not only did the timing of Rumsfeld firing make it look like the President keeled under to the Democrat leadership, but forcing Rumsfeld's resignation before the election could have boosted the election chances of Republicans all across the country. Whether that is true or not, people will believe it to be true, just because the allegation has been publicly announced.

Remember the old Hitlerian adage: "Truth is not what is; truth is what people believe it to be".

We have also stated in many occasions over the years that the true skill of a master propagandist is to make planned events unfold in the daily news in such a manner as to seem accidental. In this regard, the Mass Media and the master media officials of both Republican and Democrat parties are skilled without equal. Their manipulation of the "news" is simply incredible, and has allowed them to lull the vast majority of Americans to sleep.

Most incredible to me is this statistic: seven out of ten Evangelical Christian voters still cast their ballots for the Republican Party. Even though the gay sex scandals involving Republican politicians and Ted Haggard (President Bush's man heading the Evangelical Movement) should have awakened tens of millions of Evangelicals, it apparently did not. In the field of propaganda, it is so true, that, once a person's mind is captured for a particular point of view, even the heaviest of contrary revelations will likely not break through!

What was that old American adage? "My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts"!

IV. As President Bush fired Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, he quickly announced that he was appointing CFR's Robert Gates to assume responsibilities as Defense Secretary.

Imagine my surprise when I discovered that Gates had argued - in tandem with CFR's Zbigniew Brzezinski - just two years ago that the Bush Administration should pursue dialogue with Iran, instead of threatening attack. Does this reality mean that, now the Democrats control the Congress, President Bush will call off his relentless diatribe against Iran? Can we now assume that the possibility of war with Iran is a thing of the past?

NEWS BRIEF: "A New Perspective on Iran?", The Wall Street Journal, November 8, 2006

"Whatever else he may bring to his new job at the Pentagon, Robert Gates apparently holds a view on the highly sensitive subject of relations with Iran that hasn’t been embraced by all his new colleagues in the Bush administration. At a White House news conference, President Bush made the stunning announcement that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is departing, to be replaced by Gates. That announcement will immediately focus attention on the views held by Gates, a longtime Washington national security hand who was a leading adviser to President Bush’s father during the first war with Iraq."

"On at least one Persian Gulf issue, Gates has been associated with a different approach than the one now being pursued. In the summer of 2004, Gates and former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski co-chaired a task force sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations that argued for opening a dialogue with Iran. The task force’s report contended that the lack of American engagement with Iran had harmed American interests, and advocated direct talks with the Iranians. 'Just as the United States has a constructive relationship with China (and earlier did so with the Soviet Union) while strongly opposing certain aspects of its internal and international policies, Washington should approach Iran with a readiness to explore areas of common interests while continuing to contest objectionable policy', said the report, entitled 'Iran: Time for a New Approach'.

(Read the task force’s report and Read excerpts of Gates’s writings on Iraq, Iran, terrorism, intelligence.)

Let us now go to this article, "Robert Gates In His Own Words" to see exactly what he said about confrontation with Iran -- remembering that Gates is high-level CFR Illuminati.

"The United States' long lack of direct contact with, and presence in, Iran drastically impedes its understanding of domestic, as well as regional, dynamics. In turn, this reduces Washington's influence across the Middle East in ways that are manifestly harmful to its ultimate interests. Direct dialogue approached candidly and without restrictions on issues of mutual concern would serve Iran's interests ... However, these demands should not constitute preconditions for dialogue. …."

The Bush Administration has long insisted that Iran must abide by all American demands before talks could even be scheduled; in other words, America was demanding that Iran accept all preconditions before talks could even begin.

This next article reiterates the pro-Iran tilt of Robert Gates.

NEWS BRIEF: "Blood Sacrifice", By Jacob Laksin, Front Line News, November 9, 2006

"No sooner had Democrats captured one House, than President Bush began cleaning another. First on the presidential chopping block was Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who will now step aside in favor of former CIA director Robert Gates. The president’s new choice is a foreign policy 'realist' who believes Iran 'could play a potentially significant role in promoting a stable, pluralistic government in Baghdad'.”

Does the Gate nomination, plus the timing of the firing of Rumsfeld, plus the James Baker commission, equal a marked change in the foreign policy of the Bush Administration? Are we now going to see a strategic retreat from Iraq and a rapprochement with Iran? Only time can tell, but the news should be interesting, that is for sure.

CFR's Robert Gates is also a trusted Bush Family insider who has a checkered history.

NEWS BRIEF: "The Secret World of Robert Gates", by Robert Parry, Scoop News and Analysis, 10 November 2006

"Robert Gates, George W. Bush's choice to replace Donald Rumsfeld as Defense Secretary, is a trusted figure within the Bush Family's inner circle, but there are lingering questions about whether Gates is a trustworthy public official. The 63-year-old Gates has long faced accusations of collaborating with Islamic extremists in Iran, arming Saddam Hussein's dictatorship in Iraq, and politicizing U.S. intelligence to conform with the desires of policymakers - three key areas that relate to his future job."

How long has it been since the CIA had a leader who treated intelligence information fairly and accurately? The answer is probably "not since the end of World War II". During wartime, intelligence must be treated accurately, or soldiers may die unnecessarily and wars may be lost which could have been won. But, in the highly politicized era after World War II, intelligence has been continually manipulated for both internal political gain and for global goals.

"In 1991, despite doubts about Gates's honesty over Iran-Contra and other scandals, the career intelligence officer brushed aside accusations that he played secret roles in arming both sides of the Iran-Iraq War. Since then, however, documents have surfaced that raise new questions about Gates's sweeping denials ... the questions about Gates's participation in dubious schemes involving hotspots such as Iran and Iraq are relevant again today because they reflect on Gates's judgment, his honesty and his relationship with two countries at the top of U.S. military concerns ... The United States also is facing down Iran's Islamic government over its nuclear ambitions. Though Bush has so far emphasized diplomatic pressure on Iran, he has pointedly left open the possibility of a military option."

However, CFR members from both the Right (Robert Gates) and the Left (Zbignew Brzezinski) segments joined together two years ago to call for the United States to engage Iran in diplomatic negotiations, rather than threaten them militarily. Since this report was created and issued under the auspices of the CFR, we can only conclude that these opinions carry great weight and may one day actually be implemented by the President of the United States!

Listen to the pertinent segment of this special CFR report.

NEWS BRIEF: "A Strategy for Nuclear Iran", By Thomas Donnelly, NATIONAL SECURITY OUTLOOK, Washington, D.C., October 1, 2004

"Kerry is not the only one eager for engagement with Iran; indeed, this has been a pet project of many American diplomats since the Iranian revolution of 1979. A more tempered version of the Kerry 'grand bargain' proposal--call it the 'modest bargain' alternative--is encapsulated in the recent report, Iran: Time for a New Approach, by the Council on Foreign Relations (Zbigniew Brzezinski and Robert M. Gates, cochairs, Iran: Time for a New Approach (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2004).

"... the CFR report finds:

[Tehran] could play a potentially significant role in promoting a stable, pluralistic government in Baghdad. It might be induced to be a constructive actor toward both Iraq and Afghanistan, but it retains the capacity to create significant difficulties for these regimes if it is alienated from the new post-conflict governments in those two countries.

"Thus, inevitably, it is the council’s recommendation that the United States 'engage selectively with Iran to promote regional stability'. This, in the task force’s eyes, constitutes a 'revised strategic approach to Iran'.”

Therefore, Robert Gates is on record in a recent CFR publication advocating a far different approach to dealing with Iran's supposed nuclear warhead program. While the President threatens and moves naval fleets to the Iranian coastline, Gates is co-author of a CFR proposal which would take the opposite road!

And, there can be no doubt whatsoever that Bush knew of Gates' stance on Iran before he tagged him to be the next Defense Secretary. Does Gates' appointment mean that Bush is about to change his militarily threatening posture toward Iran? We heartily think so, since we have been doubtful from the beginning that Iran would ever be attacked.

We can only hope this is the case, for I have grown weary of this particular type of "Rumors of Wars"!

Book or Video

IV. Self-criticism within the Republican Party now begins, with Conservatives saying that the GOP lost because its leaders has abandoned truly conservative values. However, the reality is that, since World War II, Republicans have never lived up to truly Conservative values!

NEWS BRIEF: "Agape Press Agrees With Tom Horn: This Was A Good Election Loss for the GOP", by By Matt Friedeman, Raiders News Networks, November 9th, 2006

"In general, this was a good election. The only way to make it great would be for Republicans to have lost another five seats in the Senate and another 20 in the House. The worse the loss, the quicker and more intensely the GOP searches for its wandering soul."

This theme is turning out to be a general line of commentary by conservatives, i.e., the real reason Republicans lost this election was because the Bush type of Republican had forgotten who Republicans have generally been, and what policies the GOP have traditionally supported. You will see this false theme crop up in the writings of a number of pundits.

However, to whom does Matt Friedman point as an example of the type of Republicans the Bush types should have emulated?

"The party of Reagan is sick and has been for some time."

Friedman and others generally point to Ronald Reagan as the epitome of what a good, Conservative Republican is supposed to be. This is so far from the truth it really depresses me, and we shall return to this subject after this next segment tells us what specific policies are supposed to be associated with a Reagan-type Republican.

"Remember that you once were, and should be again, the party of small government. That some in the GOP think there is such a thing as big government conservatism only shows how ailing it really is. Stick a thermometer in the mouth of the Bush crowd and their friends in the Senate and the House and watch the mercury climb to the letters GOS -- short for 'Grand Old Spending'."

"Bush has signed every spending bill that crossed his desk. His veto pen, apparently, was lost or stolen ... As the deficit ballooned, all the president could talk about was cutting it in half. Faint-hearted, that ... Search for and find your morally conservative character. The Judeo-Christian ethic is nothing to be ashamed of in public policy or personal life."

At least Friedman recognizes that President Bush has not displayed the kind of genuine Christian ethic which his handlers have so faithfully promised the Christians that he recognized and practiced. If you have not fully understood the truly evil spiritual fruits which President Bush has exhibited since becoming President, click on "President Bush's Evil vs Good Fruits". You will be shocked!

But, now, let us turn our attention back to President Ronald Reagan, held up by Mr. Friedman as the highest example of what a genuine Conservative Republican is supposed to be. First, I will list the traditional conservative position as enunciated by Matt Friedman and then comment on how well President Reagan fulfilled that utopian dream.

Premise #1 -- Party of Small Government -- Even though Reagan campaigned in 1980 and 1984 on the basis of small government, the reality was that the Federal Bureaucracy was badly bloated by the time he left office in 1988. Conservatives at the time were very upset over this issue alone.

Premise #2 -- Restrained Federal Spending -- Again, Reagan failed this litmus test for a real conservative. His spending ballooned increasingly fat in the last four years of his presidency.

Premise #3 -- Controlled Budget -- Budgets and spending go hand in hand, and by the time Reagan left office, political pundits on both sides of the aisle were calling the deficit "Reagan's Deficit".

Premise #4 -- Judeo-Christian Ethic -- Even though Friedman did not specify exactly what he had in mind for this category, I well remember the intense disappointment I felt in 1988 because Reagan fulfilled not one of his campaign promises concerning Abortion. During both the 1980 and 1984 presidential campaigns, Reagan spoke strongly, loudly, and eloquently against Abortion; his stump speeches were so very good they truly galvanized the Christian base. Genuine Christians really thought that a President Reagan would actually act to stop Abortion On Demand.

During his eight years in the Oval Office, President Reagan spoke often and hard against Abortion.

Yet, when he left office on January 20, 1989, he had accomplished nothing against Abortion. Reagan was the hottest and most eloquent speaker against Abortion, and yet he took no concrete action that would have curtailed, or stopped this heinous murder of the child within the womb.

Furthermore, after winning the 1984 re-election, President Reagan began to purge his Cabinet with genuinely Conservative officials, replacing them with the far more Liberal Rockefeller type Republicans. True Conservative Americans were very upset over this purge, for it revealed the inner heart of Reagan. Reagan's final blows against Conservative principles occurred just before he left office, while he was awaiting President George H.W. Bush to assume the Oval Office. Do you remember?

* In November, 1988, President Reagan looked into the TVcamera to announce that the Soviet Union no longer constituted a threat to the United States, even though that country still had enormous numbers of missiles aimed at our country. Conservatives were appalled.

* In December, 1988, President Reagan's Secretary of State, George Schultz, announced a dramatic change in American policy toward that most evil Palestinian terrorist, Yassir Arafat. Reagan had followed the policy of his predecessors by refusing to treat this terrorist in the same manner they would treat a Head of State. Yet, Schultz announced that, from that moment forward, the United States would deal directly with Arafat! Conservatives were in an uproar!

American Conservatives understood the real Ronald Reagan, until the mid-1990's, when Rush Limbaugh began to recreate Reagan into the image which Establishment Republicans wished him to be remembered. That Reagan which Matt Friedman holds in such high esteem is as false as a $3 bill, but oh, how right Adolf Hitler was when he reiterated again and again:

"Truth is not what is; truth is what people perceive it to be."

V. One of the consequences of the ugly story about Pastor Ted Haggard and his gay sex and drug use was that the "Jesus Camp" was shut down for at least several years.

NEWS BRIEF: "Pastor will shut down controversial kids camp", The Seattle Times, November 8, 2006

"The summer camp featured in the documentary 'Jesus Camp', which includes scenes with disgraced preacher Ted Haggard, will shut down for at least several years because of negative reaction sparked by the film ... The documentary, which hit select U.S. theaters during the summer, portrays Fischer, 55, as drill instructor to a group of young evangelical children steeling themselves for spiritual and political warfare. Led by Fischer, the children pray in tongues, as is common in charismatic strains of Pentecostalism; tearfully beg God to end abortion; and bless President Bush at a weeklong camp in Devils Lake, N.D."

This last sentence says these young Evangelical children were being encourage to "bless President Bush". The picture I was sent some weeks ago (and cannot now find) showed very young children prostrating themselves at the feet of a cardboard cutout of President Bush -- much like the pagan scene of Daniel where King Nebuchadrezzar forced the people to bow down before him. The tenor of the whole picture was startling and discomforting to me, as it surely seemed to be encouraging these impressionable young people to bow down to the President.

Now, let us return to this article, for we shall see the part Pastor Ted Haggard played in shutting this camp down.

"Fischer has drawn fire from some corners for 'brainwashing' the children. After vandals damaged the campground last month and critics besieged Fischer with negative e-mails, phone calls and letters, the pastor said she's shutting down the camp for at least several years ... The documentary also includes scenes of Haggard, the evangelical leader accused of gay sex and drug use. In one scene, directors Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady visit Haggard's 14,000-member New Life Church in Colorado Springs, Colo. He tells the vast audience, 'We don't have to debate about what we should think about homosexual activity. It's written in the Bible'."

We can only shudder at the rank hypocrisy contained within this last sentence. Here Pastor Haggard is upholding the Biblical ban on homosexual activity, even as he is silently going regularly to a male prostitute in Denver for both sex and for drugs. For those of you who may not have heard, Haggard admitted that he was "guilty of sexual immorality".

Read this next article carefully:

NEWS BRIEF: "Haggard: "I am a deceiver": The Denver Post, November 8, 2006

"Colorado Springs - Banished from the pulpit that brought him to national prominence, the Rev. Ted Haggard confessed in a letter read Sunday at New Life Church to 'sexual immorality', calling himself 'a deceiver and a liar' who has long struggled against dark forces."

While we can appreciate and understand that Haggard fought and struggled against "dark forces", he at least should have resigned as senior pastor and gone into another line of work, rather than continuing in his pulpit, and uttering such words against the very sin he against which he was preaching. The integrity of Jesus Christ and of His Church and of His Word is badly tarnished by this "deceiver and liar".

Furthermore, very few people will ever believe Haggard solicited a massage from this male prostitute, but did not have sex with him.

Similarly, very few people will ever believe Haggard ordered drugs from the male prostitute, paid for them, and then threw them away.

It is a sad day for the Christian Church and aids in our further slide into the abyss of persecution once the Plan to discredit President Bush reaches its final climax.

Two Other Republican Leaders "Outed" For Being Gay

1) Representative Foley, R-Florida -- revealed that he had been overly friendly to young House page boys. Foley later admitted he was a "gay man", but blamed it on his Roman Catholic priest.

2) Bill Mahr has just revealed that the Republican National Committee chairman is openly gay!

NEWS BRIEF: "RNC chairman a closet 'gay,' charges Bill Maher: HBO star plans to out other top homosexual Republicans", World Net Daily, November 9, 2006

"Political pundit Bill Maher last night accused the head of the Republican National Committee of being a closet 'gay'. Appearing on CNN's Larry King Live, Maher said it's an open secret in Washington that RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman is a homosexual and that he has 'never denied' it. Maher added that he plans to out at least three other closeted Republican officials – including "chiefs of staff" – on his HBO political show tomorrow night to show their hypocrisy in supporting traditional family values. He is host of 'Real Time with Bill Maher'."

Cutting Edge has been warning since mid-2002 that President Bush's policies on Gays and Lesbians was identical to the policies of President Clinton! Please take a few moments to read our warnings, starting in mid-2002:




Few Christians and fewer Conservatives listened to our warnings four years ago, that the policies of the Bush Administration were thoroughly gay and that the entire Administration was riddled with gay appointees. In fact, in NEWS1723, we demonstrate that the Bush Administration systematically promotes the gay agenda. Further, we report the reality that openly gay organizations simply love President Bush, a fact to which Bible-believing Christians should immediately react, for we are warned:

"Do not be deceived and misled. Evil companionships, communion, associations corrupt and deprave good manners and morals and character." [1 Corinthians 15:33; Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary]

V. Has Franklin Graham revealed his true inner heart? Ecumenism seems to be the order of the day, just as it has been with Billy Graham!

NEWS BRIEF: "Christian charity bans Christmas themed children's gifts: So Muslims will not be offended", Daily Mail, 9th November 2006

"It is a Christian charity bringing Christmas cheer to needy children abroad. So its decision to ban Jesus, God and anything else connected with its own faith has been greeted with little short of puzzlement. Operation Christmas Child, run by the charity Samaritan's Purse, sends festive packages to deprived youngsters in countries ravaged by war and famine. Donors are asked to pack shoeboxes with a cuddly toy, a toothbrush and toothpaste, soap and flannel, notepads, colouring books and crayons - but nothing to do with Christmas."

Did you get this last sentence? These Christmas packages cannot be packed with religious Christmas symbols or articles! What kind of nonsense is this? We learn what kind of nonsense this is by the next segment, and hold on to your hats, for you are going to be shocked beyond rational belief.

"Stories from the Bible, images of Jesus and any other Christian literature are expressly forbidden - in case Muslims are offended."

Can you imagine this peculiar kind of apostasy? Franklin Graham has not minced words in the past concerning the Muslim faith, so why should his organization be so sensitive to Muslims here? True Christianity offends by its very nature, because it tells all adherents of all other nations that their religion is false and is going to lead them to Hell -- and that Jesus Christ is the only way to Heaven.

THAT is offensive! There is no getting around it, and Jesus was very firm. A person following a false religion must first be brought to the place where they understand that their religion is false, and that is offensive. But, the good news is that eternal salvation is FREE to all who will recognize Jesus as the only Savior, and repent of their sins through the shed blood of Jesus on the Cross.

But, first, the follower of the false religion needs to be offended!

This next segment understands this simple truth.

"Yesterday the charity's policy of censoring its own faith was described as political correctness gone mad."

Now, we get the full explanation and it is truly nonsensical.

"... Barbara Hill, who works at the worldwide charity's UK headquarters in Buckhurst Hill, Essex, said: 'Anything we find in the boxes which has a religious nature will be removed. 'If a box was opened by a Muslim child in a Muslim country they may be offended so we try to avoid religious images'."

"Yesterday the policy was condemned as 'bizarre'. John Midgley, cofounder of the Campaign Against Political Correctness, said: 'It seems extraordinary that a Christian charity is so concerned about political correctness that it is banning itself from its own core values."

We could not agree more. It is most definitely the "sign of the times" when a Christian missionary organization bans symbols key to its own beliefs.

"A spokesman for Samaritan's Purse, which was introduced to Britain by evangelist Billy Graham and is run internationally by his son Franklin, said: 'Christianity motivates many of our supporters to help children in need. We are a Christian charity and that's about helping people. 'But it's our policy not to put religious, political or military items in boxes which go to areas of different cultures'."

We think we can see the hand behind the scene, of that ecumenical religious leader, Billy Graham!

And, Mr. Franklin Graham, the Bible says that the true goal of any Christian is to sow precious Gospel seed so people can be saved, not just to be a charity that "helps people" physically, but ignores the destiny of their eternal soul!

VI. Jerusalem's planned Gay Pride Event got underway, but under a much different scenario than was originally planned.

NEWS BRIEF: "Gay Pride event to be held at Hebrew U.", The Jerusalem Post, November 10, 2006

"The 2006 Jerusalem Gay Pride Parade took on a new name and format Thursday, with organizers expressing satisfaction that despite the last-minute changes, the event will be held in Jerusalem at the planned date and time. Now known as 'All the Colors of the Rainbow', its location was shifted a second time and the march segment canceled. The final version consists of a rally at the Hebrew University Stadium at Givat Ram, which was supposed to be the terminus of the parade after it was moved from downtown to the government compound."

"Police held a top-level planning session early Thursday morning in which Insp.-Gen Moshe Karadi announced that Jerusalem District Police chief Cmdr. Ilan Franco had presented a plan to move the march to a location that would be easier to secure.'

Therefore, the much anticipated and hotly debated Gay Pride "event" came for the first time to Jerusalem. Since Judaism has long condemned homosexuality in the strongest possible terms, including a death penalty for any one participating in it, gay pride has come more slowly to Israel.

But, here it is now, telling us that one more obstacle to the foretold End of the Age has been overcome.

Listen now to a local person explain the full significance of this "Gay Pride Event", in an email dated 11/10.

NEWS BRIEF: "Latest On Gay Parade", November 10, 2006, Email

'Praise the Lord with us that this parade in the streets of Jerusalem has been replaced with a closed event. Police, Orthodox and Gay communities have struck a compromise deal. Israeli media sources report that after deliberations with all involved, the contested event will NOT take place as planned on Fri 10 Nov. Instead of a march through Jerusalem's streets, there will be a closed event at the Hebrew University's Jerusalem campus - an idea proffered by the gay community after police insisted that they would be unable to properly secure the event from violent protestors. Given the new location, police announced that they could secure the event with 3,000 officers instead of the 12,000 originally allocated. Many thanks to all who prayed about this. Prayer does change things!!!!!

Instead of allowing open debauchery to be exhibited down Jerusalem's street and alleyways, gays and lesbians were forced to hold their "event" within the confines of Hebrew University Stadium. Still, we are saddened by the reality that gays and lesbians have finally cracked the most solid of possible obstacles -- the Old Testament Scriptures.

Just another "Sign of the Times"!

---------- Articles Posted ----------

* "Israeli Prime Minister Rabin WAS NOT Killed By the Convicted Shooter!

Video footage of an eyewitness standing one meter from Rabin when the shots rang out has now come public, destroying the official government story and strongly suggesting that Rabin died later, while in government "protective" security!

Jewish journalist, Barry Chamish, was right in his most important book, "Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin?", when he demonstrated the logical likelihood that Rabin was murdered by agent security agents after the assassination attempt, not by the poor Yigal Amir, who was convicted of killing Prime Minister Rabin. --

As Cutting Edge has long taught, the truth of a matter is most often found in the exact opposite direction of the public rhetoric! ("BREAKING OUT OF THE MENTAL BOX -- LEARNING TO THINK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF PROPAGANDA TO FIND THE TRUTH", NEWS1558)


“…Thou Shalt Not Be As The Hypocrites Are…” (Excerpt from Matthew 6:5, KJV)

Ghandi of India reportedly said this about Christianity: "I like their Christ. I do not like their Christians. Their Christians are so unlike their Christ."


--------Concluding Inspiration ---------------"The love of Christ constraineth us." 2 Corinthians 5:14

How much owest thou unto my Lord?

Has He ever done anything for thee? Has He forgiven thy sins? Has He covered thee with a robe of righteousness? Has He set thy feet upon a rock? Has He established thy goings? Has He prepared heaven for thee? Has He prepared thee for heaven? Has He written thy name in His book of life? Has He given thee countless blessings? Has He laid up for thee a store of mercies, which eye hath not seen nor ear heard? Then do something for Jesus worthy of His love. Give not a mere wordy offering to a dying Redeemer. How will you feel when your Master comes, if you have to confess that you did nothing for Him, but kept your love shut up, like a stagnant pool, neither flowing forth to His poor or to His work. Out on such love as that!

What do men think of a love which never shows itself in action? Why, they say, "Open rebuke is better than secret love." Who will accept a love so weak that it does not actuate you to a single deed of self-denial, of generosity, of heroism, or zeal! Think how He has loved you, and given Himself for you! Do you know the power of that love? Then let it be like a rushing mighty wind to your soul to sweep out the clouds of your worldliness, and clear away the mists of sin. "For Christ's sake" be this the tongue of fire that shall sit upon you: "for Christ's sake" be this the divine rapture, the heavenly afflatus to bear you aloft from earth, the divine spirit that shall make you bold as lions and swift as eagles in your Lord's service.

Love should give wings to the feet of service, and strength to the arms of labour. Fixed on God with a constancy that is not to be shaken, resolute to honour Him with a determination that is not to be turned aside, and pressing on with an ardour never to be wearied, let us manifest the constraints of love to Jesus. May the divine loadstone draw us heavenward towards itself.

(C.H. Spurgeon, "Morning and Evening Devotions")

May Jesus Richly Bless You,

David Bay, Director

866-909-2850 Toll Free Customer Service - Order Line

803-356-2850 Toll Free Customer Service - Order Line

803-356-2860 Fax


"Remote Control - Study of Subliminal Advertising In TV and Movies"

Book Only $9.99

Subliminal Advertising never stopped and is more sophisticated than ever before. You and your children are being daily subjected to hundreds of subliminal messages

"God's Covenant With Israel - Brilliant Defense of Israel's Biblical Claim To The Land"

Israel clearly has a Biblical Deed to the Land of Israel!

Illuminati Mystery Babylon

Marrs explains how the Rothschilds and other Judeo-Masonic adepts have controlled America behind the scenes for over 225 years -- as the unfinished pyramid on the back of the US One Dollar Bill demonstrates! Did the Illuminati secretly fund the American Revolution and bankroll the Continental Army of George Washington? Even today, the manipulate our economy, culture and especially our politicians!

Helping Defend Your Child Against Modern Interpretation of Archaeology

Comes with FREE 90-Minute DVD. Fighting Modern Public School Lies - Adults and children alike have been fascinated with the Egyptian civilization for decades, but most modern archaeologists have lately tried to use Egyptian chronology to dispute the biblical record of Joseph, Moses, and the Exodus

Egyptian, Masonic, Satanic Connection

A tight tie exists between Freemasonry and Satanism. This author examines the rituals, doctrines, and literature of Freemasonry, comparing it to identical literature in both Satanism and Ancient Egyptian Mysteries. Since Masonic leaders -- like Albert Pike -- admit that Freemasonry is IDENTICAL to the Egyptian Mysteries

The Great Seal of the United States: Its Occult Meaning

The symbols which comprise the Great Seal are blatantly Masonic and deeply occultic. From the very birth of our nation, occult forces have been mightily at work in order to subvert our American government and way of life so the Plan of the Great White Brotherhood may go forward to produce their spiritual superman, Antichrist.

The Next Holocaust: And God's Provided Refuge In Edom

With so much prophecy being fulfilled in our Daily News, the appearance of Antichrist, and the persecution of the Jewish people and the prophesied Godly protection of the one-third remnant in Edom, has got to be close at hand

DVD covers these topics: 1)What is the purpose of the Great Tribulation? 2) What is the prophetic role of Ammon, Moab and Edom (collectively now known as Jordan)? 3) Where does Jesus actually return -- on the Mount of Olives, or in Bozrah?

This DVD also explores some of the less familiar prophecies of the End Times, the Tribulation, and the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

View The Trailer for the new DVD "One Nation Under Siege"

The Nightmare Is Beginning

Christian Words, Un-Christian Actions

Bush's Actions NOT Christian

Fulfillment of Rev 6:8?





Big Savings on Closeouts and sale items

A Biblical Headline News Analysis

"President Bush:
Evil vs Good Fruits"

Harry Potter Articles

Directory of all news articles

Free Radio Transcripts

Free Newsletter Archives


What Saith Rome

Teachings from the Catechism


Meet the Staff

Weather Control

School Shootings

Understanding Clinton

See our latest Emailed Newsletter HERE - Home - Book Store