Subtitle: This article contains two parts.  Part 1 will demonstrate how wide of a net the FBI has cast in defining who is a "Domestic Terrorist".  Part 2 will show that this plan is already being implemented, and is already starting to occur!

The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!

Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!

Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.



In previous articles and radio programs, we have demonstrated that America is heading quickly into the planned dictatorship spoken of often in New World Order planning documents.  The only surprise is that this movement into the dictatorship is being led by a "Christian, Compassionate, Conservative" Republican, George W. Bush.  For eight years, I really thought the "evil" Bill Clinton would be the President to lead America into the dictatorship of the New World Order.

Let us quickly review the specific steps toward dictatorship using terrorism as the "artificial threat" we have already identified in previous articles.  If you have not read these articles yet, we encourage you to do so.

NEWS1550     "BITTER FRUITS OF BUSH'S WAR ON TERRORISM -- PROPOSED LOSS OF PERSONAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS -- Just as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion Envisioned 200 years ago!"



Occult Signature Visible on Votes of Both House and Senate "666"





Once you understand the principles, you will better comprehend the unique disaster befalling us right now,  right here!  As of now, only the discerning citizen understands.  The vast majority of the American people will remain asleep until their liberties are long gone, and even then, many will excuse the dictatorship under which they are suddenly groaning because they have succumbed to the propaganda that such a loss of liberties is absolutely "essential" to the government "solving" the "crisis".  Let us review that pertinent part of the Illuminist plan to abolish liberties under the guise of a created and thoroughly managed "crisis".


"4. WE ARE WOLVES -- The gentiles are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock? .....

5. There is another reason also why they will close their eyes: for we shall keep promising them to give back all the liberties we have taken away as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace and tamed all parties .....

6. It is not worthwhile to say anything about how long a time they will be kept waiting for this return of their liberties .....

7. For what purpose, then, have we invented this whole policy ...?" [The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol Number 11, The Totalitarian State ]

Notice, carefully, that the leaders in charge at the time of the contrived crisis will promise the people they will get their liberties back once the crisis is over!  I can just see "Christian" Bush and Ashcroft promising restoration of liberties and Constitutional Government once they have "solved" the crisis they created in the first place!  Maybe they will even make this promise with their right hands placed on a Bible.

But, Note #6 tells us that the citizens will never get their freedoms back.  Finally, Note #7 boldly proclaims that this entire episode resulting in absolute dictatorship has been "invented" by the very Wolves about to take absolute control.  Bush and other Illuminists are the Wolves and we are the sheep.  In past articles [NEWS1314], we have demonstrated that the Skull & Bones Secret Society in which George W. admitted last August, 2000, that he was a member, is the same Brotherhood of Death Society which trained Adolf Hitler into the deepest, darkest recesses of the Black Magick Witchcraft. Hitler used this occult knowledge to creat all the atrocities committed by the Germans during World War II.  This is the true George W.; please doubt it not.

Adolf Hitler's favorite animal symbol was the fierce, wild Wolf of the German forests.  Please understand that this country has been prepared to be ravaged by the occult Wolf just behind the mask of our current leaders.


Less than two years before Clinton left office, his FBI sent out flyers to all FBI offices nationwide, in which the subject of "Domestic Terrorism" was discussed.  As the front of the flyer stated:  "The FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force is attempting to identify criminal activities with domestic terrorists.  In this regard, the purpose of this information sheet is to assist uniformed patrol officers in identifying potential domestic terrorism.  Domestic terrorist is defined as:  Groups or individuals entirely inside the US, attempting to influence the US government or population, to effect political or social change by engaging in criminal activity." [http://www.keepandbeararms.com/images/FBI-MCSOTerroristFlyer-Front.jpg]

Notice how quickly and vaguely the definition of terrorist is changed in this "Information Sheet".  The one fact that immediately leapt out at me was that this definition did not include any actual destructive acts.  My dictionary defines "terrorism" as:  "The use of terror, violence, and intimidation to achieve an end, especially a political end." [Tormont Webster's Illustrated Encyclopedic Dictionary ].

Rather, the FBI re-defined terrorism as any group or individual who merely is engaged in "attempting to influence the US government or population"; further, these "influencing" activities constitute "criminal activity".  Thus, by this definition, any Christian organization that attempts to "influence" the US government on issues such as Abortion is guilty of "Domestic Terrorism"!  Any Christian who attempts to "influence the .... population" in any way, even just witnessing to them of Jesus Christ and His Plan of Salvation, is guilty of "Domestic Terrorism"! 

Thus, such "influencing" activity is easily construed as "engaging in criminal activity"!  Americans today are skating on the thinnest of ice and we are about to plunge through, many of us to our deaths.  Every Executive Order that strips more rights of the individual "warms up the ice" even more, making it thinner each day.


But, this FBI Information Sheet contains even more horror.  When you turn to the back of the flyer, you read the specific types of "Domestic Terrorists". [http://www.keepandbeararms.com/images/FBI-MCSOTerroristFlyer-Back.jpg]

You will undoubtedly realize that you fall into one of these categories.

"Right-Wing Extremists -- defined as:  1)  Defenders of US Constitution against Federal Government and the UN {Super Patriots}; 2) Groups or individuals engaged in para-military training."

Wow!  Notice how this Definition #1 places both the Federal Government and the United Nations above the United States' Constitution!  Even though all our officials consistently take oaths to "defend and uphold" the US Constitution, we can see they really loathe it, and are ready to declare anyone who dares defend the Constitution as a "Domestic Terrorist".  President Bush has repeatedly told us that his Federal Government is "at war" against "Terrorism"; therefore, that must mean that the Federal Government considers itself to be at war against its own citizens, those conveniently redefined as "Domestic Terrorist".

New Age author Bill Cooper called this war the "silent war" -- government silently waging war on its own citizens!

"Left-Wing Terrorism -- Political motivation is usually Marxist/Leninist philosophy".  Taking a page from Hitler's Nazi book, our government stokes the fires of Anti-Communism in this rule.  Hitler gained much Right-Wing support simply and only because of his Anti-Communist stance.

The fact of the matter is that any extremist, from either side of the spectrum, is unwelcome.

"Hate Groups -- defined as:  1)  Skinheads, Nazis, Neo-Nazis (usually recognized by tattoos); 2) Black Separatists; 3) KKK [Ku Klux Klan]; 4) Christian Identity; 5) White Nationalists"\

This definition of "Hate Group" does not include any Fundamental, Born Again Christians, for we fit none of these definitions.  However, we are included in Right Wing Extremists and in a couple other categories; given the Politically Correct definition of "Hate Group", and considering that Fundamental Christian ministries have already been labeled as  "Hate Groups", I can only assume it will not be too long for that label to be applied to us, as well.

"Common Law Movement Proponents -- defined as:  1) Fictitious license plates; 2) No license plates; 3)  Fictitious driver's license; 4) Refuse to Identify Themselves; 5) Request Authority For Stop; 6) Make Numerous references to US Constitution; 7) Claim driving is a right, not a privilege; 8)  Attempt to 'police the police'."

For those of you who are not familiar with Common Law Proponents, they refuse to recognize the authority of Federal and State governments.  Thus, they may refuse to get a driver's license, or they may get a fake one; they may put a fictitious license plate on their vehicles or may drive their vehicles without any license.  When stopped, they may refuse to identify themselves because they do not recognize the authority of the policeman who has stopped them.  Such people are now "Domestic Terrorists".

However, I do take exception to Domestic Terrorist definitions 6 through 8.  Americans have always had the inherent, guaranteed right to ensure that the person stopping them has the authority - the jurisdiction - to stop and question them.  American citizens have always had the right to ensure that whatever action the police are taking is in accordance with the provisions of the US Constitution!  Now, the tables are turned 180 degrees; whoever makes a reference to the US Constitution is a "Domestic Terrorist".  If it were possible, our Founding Fathers would be turning over in their graves; no, it it were possible, they would be coming right out of the graves to mightily protest.  The very Constitution they gave their lives, their honor, and their possessions for, is now being treated as toilet paper!  Now, the very citizen they tried so hard to protect is a criminal -- a terrorist -- for even mentioning the US Constitution when they are stopped and questioned.

Americans have always used the US Constitution to "police the police", and for good historic reason.  Whenever the police are no longer restrained by a document like the Constitution, they are soon wreaking terror amongst the people.  History is replete with example after example after example.  Our Founding Fathers were sick and tired of the King's police barging into homes, rifling through drawers, arresting at the drop of a hat, and throwing people into the worst of the prisons imaginable, to await a fate of either a long prison term, or death.  Now, our precious Constitution is being trashed by the FBI, and no one seems to know or care.

"Claiming driving is a right, not a privilege" should read, "Claiming freedom of movement is a right, not a privilege".  Our Founding Fathers realized that personal freedom necessitated freedom of movement, among other things.  To understand how important this freedom is, just go to Communist China as I did a few years back.  Even though we were on a tour bus officially recognized by the Communist Government, the bus had to stop at a roadblock every ten miles; this roadblock was military, and a soldier fully armed entered the bus to examine the papers of the driver; he could challenge at will the papers of any individual.  At any point along the way, the bus could have been turned back, and probably could have been impounded.  We Americans take our freedom of travel -- by whatever means -- for granted.  Soon, we shall have this right taken away, under the ruse of fighting a "terrorist" crisis, I am sure.

"Single Issue Terrorists -- defined as:  1) Targeting of law enforcement and emergency personnel; 2) Animal Rights; 3) Eco-Terrorism; 4) Violent anti-abortion extremism; 5) Urban riot agitators; 6) Cyber penetration; 7) Non-Aligned Terrorists; 8) Doomsday Cult-Type Group; 9) Insurgents/Rebels; 10) Lone Individuals."

Now, which kind of person in America today would NOT fit into one of these extremely vague and broadly based groups?  While most Christians would not fall into categories 1 through 6, categories 7, 8, and 10 might be redefined well enough to include us.  Take Category #7 for example:  the entire definition hinges on the word, "non-aligned".  Since Cutting Edge Ministries is not "aligned" with any particular church, does that make us "Non-Aligned" terrorist? 

Or, how about #8 -- Doomsday Cult-Type Group:  while this definition specifically refers to a David Koresh type of cult group, I remember well President Clinton saying -- just a couple days after Waco -- that, "perhaps we need to look at anyone who literally believes in the Book of Revelation".  I am convinced this is the case in this definition.  Time will demonstrate that Fundamental Christians who literally believe -- and teach -- the Book of Revelation and all of the rest of revealed Biblical prophecy, have already been designated as "Doomsday".

Category #10 is laughable.  I know of a number of "lone individuals" who just want to live in peace and be left alone.  These individuals just want to opt out of society.  Some of them own farms outside town, have some guns for amusement and hunting, and are simply reclusive.  Now, we see that the Federal Government has classified them as a "Domestic Terrorist". Maybe the government just does not want anyone who does not feel a need for it, or any of its "programs".

Now, I can just hear some of you saying to yourself, that this FBI flyer was written and distributed by the Janet Reno Justice Department under the reign of President Clinton; therefore, there is no evidence that either Bush or Ashcroft believe in these ridiculous redefinitions of what constitutes "Domestic Terrorists". 

Were it not for the story that follows, I would be hard pressed to disagree with you.  But, this very true news story occurred on November 1, 2001, under the government of Bush and the FBI of Ashcroft; further, this story reveals that the FBI has already gone to the logical conclusion of this terrorist redefinition:  flagging the whereabouts and the movements of individuals that fall into one or more of these FBI categories, and restricting their freedom of movement.


NEWS BRIEF:  "My day at the airport", by Nancy Oden, Counterpunch , November 12, 2001.  Note:  this event occurred on November 1, 2001.

"On Thursday, November 1, 2001, I left my farmhouse on the North Coast of Maine, where I'm an organic grower, and headed for the Bangor International Airport in Bangor, Maine. I was dressed conservatively in a long, brown skirt with a matching jacket and turtleneck sweater, no jewelry, no buttons or other political indications attached, looking very like other women my age in this part of the world.

"I am a relatively well known environmental, social, and political activist who has run for public office. It should be noted that, while I've been an activist for over thirty years, I've never been arrested, nor has there been anything in my life that would signal I meant harm to anyone."

This lady is an activist in the Green Party, an extreme environmentalist group that also preaches anti-war views.  While I do not support this world view, I realize that, if the government can target this lady because of her views, the government could certainly target you and me.  As you read the rest of this story, please keep this fact in mind.

"I was headed for Chicago for a Green Party USA National Coordinating Committee meeting, where I was to speak the next night on biochemical warfare and pesticides as weapons of war. I was also scheduled to interview job applicants, present several proposals and financial reports, and so on. I am a lead person on the National Coordinating Committee of the Green Party USA ...

"I arrived at the Bangor Airport the now-requisite two hours ahead of the flight and walked in to the airport to the sight of a couple of dozen National Guard troops carrying machine guns in their hands wandering around the lobby. I walked down to the American Airlines ticket counter, where there were no other passengers, and told the airlines ticket agent my name. I was holding out my picture ID and the printed itinerary they told us to bring, but he barely glanced at them. I remember thinking, "Does he have a picture of me under that counter? Why didn't he look at my ID?"

"No one checked my ID at any time. They all knew what I looked like and, it became clear, my antiwar stance. I am not that well known that they would have known me on sight. Why were they briefed about me before I arrived at the airport? What were they told? Was it the FBI or some other agency? Which one?  The ticket agent spent an inordinate amount of time on his computer, then finally produced a boarding pass with a large "S" written on it. I asked him what that meant, and he said I had been picked to have my bags searched. Well, one expects that now, so I said, 'Oh, that's okay'. But I had a feeling there was more.Since there was no one else around, I turned back to him and looked him in the eye - he seemed a decent guy - and asked him, 'My being picked wasn't random, was it?' He hesitated a moment, but then said, 'No, your name was already flagged in the computer and you would have been searched in any case'. "  [Emphasis added]

Now we know that the "S" the ticket agent wrote on her boarding pass probably meant "Suspect".

Let us stop right here.  Her name was flagged in the computer before she even got to the airport!  Since she bought her ticket on-line through Priceline.com, it is a good bet her name was already flagged on all electronic entries she might make in this society.  What other types of electronic transactions might be flagged as well?

*  Bank transactions

*  Credit Information -- this lady might discover she might be turned down the next time she applies for a loan

*  Credit Cards

*  Driver's License

*  Registry of Motor Vehicles -- vehicle registration and vehicle license plates

*  Company through whom she has her Mortgage

This lady is undoubtedly "flagged" in a great number of instances in a society increasingly electronic.  All the warnings over the years from people concerned about the "invasion of privacy" inherent in an electronically based society are coming true, in spades!  Our Government IS planning to use our electronically based society to rule us dictatorially!

Now, let us return to this true story.

"Then to the x-ray for my bags and me. I said to the two women sitting by the machine that scans the bags. sort of apologetically, 'I've been picked to have my bags searched. I know this might sound silly, but since you handle all these people's bags and belongings--with the Anthrax scare and all--I'd like it if whoever searches through my clothes and things wash their hands first.' They looked at me with hate and loathing and one said, 'We don't want YOUR germs, either.' (Turns out they wear rubber gloves.)  'Whoa,' I thought, 'either I'm back in kindergarten or these normally quite civil women have some reason for being hostile.' I had the distinct feeling they had been told awful things about me - I want to know what they were told about this profiled individual coming to their airport."

Indeed, this question is very insightful:  what had these security people been told about Nancy Oden prior to her coming to the airport that morning?  The only way in which they could have known she was coming was from her electronic ticket bought through the Internet.  This means the entire security apparatus was alerted to her arrival and knew more about her than she would have ever thought possible.  If this scenario sounds like what has repeatedly happened to dissidents in Russia, through the repression of the KGB, you are correct in your analysis.  This story IS one of the coming repression.  Thank God we have been given prior warning of it.

Now, back to the story.

"Neither my bags nor I set off any beeps in the machinery so we walked right through to the boarding area. Here I sat down with the other passengers. There was one National Guard soldier in the boarding area; he was a short man with a black eye wearing camo gear and carrying a machine gun. 

"Soon after I sat down, the National Guardsman looked at the dozen or so passengers, his eyes stopping at me and he yelled, 'Bring those bags over here!' Since he didn't call my name, how did he know which person was me, since I did not look appreciably different from the others? When I didn't move fast enough, he yelled again, 'Hurry up! Move! Bring those bags up here!' This did not make me move faster. By now people were beginning to stare at me as if I might possibly be someone bent on doing something wrong.

"I set my two smallish bags on the table where two women were waiting to search my bags. As one of them had trouble with a zipper on my older bag, I said, 'Oh, that zipper is not right, here, let me open it for you,' and I reached over the table to undo the zipper. Immediately, the soldier yelled out, 'Get your hands away from there!' By now the other passengers were getting nervous, of course. He was standing at the end of the table with the women on one side looking in my bags and me standing on the other side of the table. I turned to face him, which put my back towards everyone else, and he grabbed my left arm and began loudly spouting pro-war nonsense into my face. 'Don't you understand we have to get them before they get us? Don't you understand what happened September 11?' and so on.

"I immediately pulled my arm away from him and said, 'Do not touch me. You cannot do that,' and stepped back a foot or so … He grabbed for me again. I stepped back further stating emphatically, 'Do Not Touch Me,' and further emphasizing that I did not want to listen to his views on the war. He was about to leave his position and come after me again, but I saw the senior security man who is usually there shake his head 'No' at the soldier, who then backed off, but he was angry that I would not submit to his holding me while he forced his views on me.

"I turned and there just a couple of inches away was the man with the metal-detecting wand. I stepped back a foot or two so he wasn't right up against me, and he did the wand thing. I was the only one whose bags were searched. For a woman of a certain age such as myself to stand there with arms outstretched while a man skimmed my body with a device was very embarrassing and demeaning. I asked him not to touch me with the wand, as I didn't know what it was, but, of course, he had to touch my shoulder with it. I ignored this, just wanting to get out of there. While he was doing the wand thing, I heard the soldier, who was behind me, say, 'Don't let her on the plane. I thought he was talking to himself.'

" 'Don't let her on the plane', the Guardsman said."  Now, why would he have made this decision?  This woman was never accused of being a terrorist that could bring a plane down. Her bags were checked thoroughly and were not found to contain an explosive device or any weapon of any sort.  This being the case, why did this National Guardsman take it upon himself to declare that she was not going to get on that airplane?  The major problem with military soldiers guarding and supervising civilians is that the soldiers tend to quickly forget that they are NOT dealing with enemy soldiers that need to be tromped on, stomped on, and defeated by any means necessary -- including killing them! 

Back to the story:

"Then they were done with the searching, and I walked the three feet to the boarding gate. The American Airlines agent said, 'You can't get on the plane.' I asked why. He replied, 'Because he [indicating the soldier] says you didn't cooperate with the search."

The National Guardsman lied .  He bold faced lied.  He said that Nancy did not cooperate with the search, when in fact she most certainly did!  The only thing she objected to was when the electronic wand touched her body, a most common reaction from a woman.  The soldier decided that Nancy was most certainly not going to fly that day, so he told a lie, and as you will see in a moment, his superior backed him up.  Thus, Nancy was denied the right to fly even though she bought a ticket like anyone else, and even though no evidence was found anywhere that would suggest that she was a threat to the airplane!

A government employee -- the National Guardsman -- lied, and that lie denied Nancy her rights to fly.  This point illustrates the huge problem of a government that has drawn too many powers to itself.  Its officials get drunk with their importance and their power over other human beings, and repression begins.  In the guise of "fighting terrorism", we are allowing our government to gain dictatorial powers, assuming these powers will only be used against "foreign terrorists" never once even thinking that maybe, just maybe, that dictatorial power might be eventually aimed at American citizens.

Or worse, yet, dictatorial power that was originally aimed at American citizens!

Now, let us return to this story:

"I then told the American Airlines agent that I needed to get to Chicago and stated what I had to do there. The American Airlines agent then said, rather softly, probably so the guardsman soldier couldn't hear, 'We'll put you on the four o'clock plane; that's the last one out today that you can go through Boston and still get to Chicago tonight.' I replied, 'Fine, let's just do this. I don't care if I'm late so long as I get there'.  Unfortunately, the Guardsman overheard, and he wasn't done with me. Clearly, this non-subservient female had to be punished for not being sufficiently obsequious. He saw me picking up my bags to go out into the lobby and wait for the 4 o'clock plane, and yelled (that seemed to be his only means of communication), 'Come With Me!' I asked, 'Why? Where are we going?' He replied, louder, 'Come With Me!' "

Right then and there, Nancy Oden became a terrorist according to the FBI redefinition as we reported, above.  She "requested to know his authority" and where they were going.  She had the audacity to ask "Why?" and "Where are we going"?  She was a "domestic terrorist", and did not even know it!

Back to Nancy:

"A few people to whom I've told this insist the government/military is trying to 'criminalize' me and other political activists who don't have criminal records … When they're harassed and/or beaten by police, they eventually, of course, do something to protect themselves and then get arrested for hitting an officer or whatever. If they then get convicted of a felony, they've go to prison and probably a few years of parole when one's rights are mostly non-existent, and draconian restrictions are put upon one's activities. Convicted felons lose a lot of rights in this country: their travel is henceforth limited, in some states they can't vote, own a gun, and various other limitations."

Nancy is absolutely correct.  The government is systematically setting about to "criminalize" the beliefs, values, and attitudes of normal, average Americans whose only "crime" is to love the U.S. Constitution and to challenge authority whenever it steps over a Constitutional boundary.   The Constitution and Bill of Rights has served this country so very well that we Americans have never known the whip of the dictator; yet, without thinking, and by allowing one's emotions to rule, Americans are quickly getting ready to jump over that cliff from which there will be no return.  Once this nation allows the Illuminati to dissolve our freedoms, we are never, ever going to get them back. 

This is the plan as enunciated loudly and clearly in occult literature.  We have reprinted the relevant portion of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion , but you can find this concept in a number of New Age books.  The Constitution has proven to be an immense hurdle to overcome in the drive to subject America to dictatorship so the New Age Christ may appear.  But, creating an "artificial threat to bring humanity together in a one-world government ... called the New World Order" seems to be successful in eroding all protective elements of the Constitution.

Back to Nancy:

"Under the circumstances, and because I had a few hours until four o'clock anyway, it seemed best to go with the guardsman. The circumstances being that each individual soldier/national guardsman seems to be The Law unto themselves. Each of them makes it up as they go along, punishing people who don't hop to. Military law is not democracy." 

Once again, Nancy has hit the nail on the head.  Whenever any military takes over police functions dealing with civilians, they quickly come to the belief that they are a "law unto themselves".  They certainly have a tendency to go to excess when dealing with a civilian, "making things up as they go along", and "punishing people who don't hop to".  Soldiers are taught very well how to deal with an enemy soldier; they kill him, they maim him, they annihilate his unit.  That is what soldiers are trained to do.  But, dealing with civilians is messy, is complicated, and not at all like dealing with enemy soldiers.  But, soldiers try to deal with civilians in precisely the same manner as they would an enemy soldier.  This fact is why Americans have been protected by "Posse Comitatis", which prohibits American soldiers from using military tactics or military weapons upon American citizens.  While this rule has historically protected Americans from their own military, President Clinton and Janet Reno effectively abolished this protection by their successful attack on civilians in Waco.  Once the American public did not react with unbridled anger, demanding that Clinton be impeached and Reno fired, the Illuminati knew they had us where they wanted us.  Now, they could have their dictatorship.  Only the timing had to be worked out.

Back to Nancy as the story gets worse:

"He took me to the entrance area, apart from anyone else. Then he ordered, loudly, "Sit Down!" I gave him a look and then sat. The soldier found the airport policeman and told him to stay with me. Upon reflection, I probably wasn't free to leave, but I thought I was waiting for the next plane so just stayed there ...Within minutes I looked up to see 5-6 National Guardsmen in their camo gear all carrying machine guns marching in a sort of formation towards me. I was sitting down quietly talking with the policeman. The situation looked like a bad movie. It occurred to me that this is how people get 'disappeared,' which has happened to over 1,200 Americans so far since September 11. We used to hear about this only in repressive military regimes in other places ... I'm sure they were ready to arrest me for allegedly 'not cooperating with a security search,' with which I had, indeed, cooperated.

"All of a sudden the ludicrousness of the situation struck me. There I am, sitting down with my bags, a woman clearly not a physical threat, and this phalanx of soldiers in formation descends upon me ready to arrest me for something I did not do. I gave a little laugh and said to the lead man, 'What, all this, just for me?' Then, I asked, 'What's this really about? What's going on here?'  He replied, 'We understand you didn't cooperate with a security search.' I said, 'That's ridiculous. They searched my bags and they did the wand search. The only problem was your man here [I indicated the short guy with the black eye] grabbing my arm and spouting pro-war views loudly in my face.' The lead soldier (I don't know his rank) said, astonishingly, 'He told me only hit your arm.'

"I looked at the lead soldier wide-eyed with a few unbidden (certainly unwanted when I'm trying to look fierce) tears in my eyes, and asked, 'Even if that's all he had done, would that be okay?' I think he then realized the guardsman had been way out of line and said, 'Wait here'. They left, and the policeman stayed with me. I don't really think I was free to go, although I had not been arrested. I found out later they had gone upstairs and told the Bangor Airport manager to tell all airlines in the Airport not to allow me to fly out of Bangor that day, and possibly more than just that one day. Since the military are in charge of our airports and they can override civilians in charge, this was made to happen.

"I was to be punished for the crime of questioning their authority, especially for the guardsman to hold my arm and force me to listen to his brain-washed rantings. Every airline in the Bangor Airport was given my name and told that I did not cooperate with a security search. Not cooperating with a security search at an airport is a federal crime. If, indeed, I had not cooperated, they would have arrested me right then and there. But I had been searched so they couldn't say that. However, now I have to wonder if every airline in the world doesn't have me in their computer as a person who didn't cooperate with the security search, which means they can deny me passage in their airplanes."

Nancy Oden has just hit the nail right on the head.  She said, "I was to be punished for the crime of questioning their authority ..." Once again, this FBI flyer clearly places her in a category of being a "Domestic Terrorist".  This FBI flyer states that a Domestic Terrorist is guilty of "Requesting authority for a stop" and attempting to "police the police".

Further, I can guarantee you that Nancy Oden's name is flagged in every computer of every airline in the world.  While Muslim terrorists can easily pass through our airport security, "Domestic Terrorists" like Nancy Oden are going to be stopped dead in their tracks.  But, why should we be surprised, for we average American citizens who just love the US Constitution and want to remain free are the real targets of this "War on Terrorism".

Nancy continued:

"They told the policeman this news and had him tell me that I wouldn't be allowed to fly out of Bangor that day. So I said I had to go American Airlines and get my money back. The policeman came with me. The same AA clerk was at the counter. He stepped outside the counter to converse with the policeman and me. He confirmed that they had been told not to allow me to fly out of Bangor that day. I asked him about the next day and he said he didn't know. This is not a small matter for me since the Bangor Airport is 100 miles from where I live. The AA clerk then suggested I drive to Boston (5-1/2 hour drive) and fly out of there. There were several problems with that, I told him. First, my old car barely made it the 100 miles to the Bangor Airport and might not make it to Boston or back again. Then there were the parking fees in Boston as well as the fact that I might not be allowed to fly out of there or might not be able to get a seat once I got there. Also, if they would not honor my now-expired ticket, I'd have to pay full fare, which I couldn't afford. Not a serious option."

"I then asked the American Airlines clerk for my money back so I might consider some alternative means of transport. He said he couldn't refund my money. I asked him why and he said, "It's a non-refundable ticket." This was so ridiculous that all three of us laughed a little. All the airlines issue tickets on other tickets all the time. So I asked him again and he said he couldn't refund the ticket, indicating it wasn't his decision, which I understood, and told him I'd take it up with the airline later. 

"Then the policeman, half apologetically, told me I'd been banned from the Airport for that day, and that he had to escort me out. I told him I understood that he was under the military's rule, and that I would call it his walking me to the door, rather than escorting me out of the Airport. We walked to the exit. I thanked him for being kind and considerate, which he had been, and left with the sinking feeling that something bad is happening to our country. And this is how it begins."


We want to thank Nancy Oden for showing us that the FBI is already "flagging" people's names in the national computer system, using a method of identifying potential "domestic terrorists" that seems eerily similar to the FBI flyer sent out during the Clinton years.  If Nancy Oden could  be denied her right to fly for no good reason, other people deemed "Domestic Terrorists" may soon be denied similar rights.  If Nancy's name was flagged as soon as she bought her air ticket on-line, her name is undoubtedly on police computers.  Thus, the day is approaching when a dissident driving his car may be pulled over for no good reason, may be detained for an equally no good reason, and actually sent to prison, again for no good reason.  How did Nancy put it?  "This is how people are 'disappeared'."

Antichrist simply cannot arise as long as major nations are still freely electing their governments.  Once these elected governments are replaced by dictatorial regimes, Antichrist will be free to stage his long-awaited appearance.  "Artificial threats" have been created under the guise of fighting terrorism that will take this government to its planned dictatorship. 

Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.

If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.

If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.

We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.

Finally, we would love to hear from you.

You can contact us by mail or email.

God bless you.

Subscribe to our email updates and messages from our editor by entering your email address below
Return to: