Resources to aid your Understanding

Book - VHS - DVD

Subtitle: Did the police act within Patriot Act I and II legislation? Was this woman arrested as a "Domestic Terrorist" according to the new definition? Did her knowledge of her Constitutional rights cause her to be singled out?

The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!

Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!

Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.



Copyright © 2004 Cutting Edge Ministries. All rights reserved. See full copyright notice below.


Since the attacks on 9/11/2001, Cutting Edge Ministries has been warning that the Bush Administration has been following the Illuminati script in getting dictatorial laws passed based upon the sheer terror and intimidation caused by this one attack. It has since been well documented that Congressmen were not allowed to read either Patriot Acts I or II before they voted to pass this legislation.

Furthermore, Bush Administration officials planned a very subtle, but effective, ruse by which to lull citizens to sleep regarding the dangers of this legislation. When the laws were passed, they were not enforced right away. Even today, they remain, for the most part, just a threat to our liberties; once the planned panics hit, these laws will be enforced and will result in our complete loss of liberties and rights.

However, even though these laws have not been enforced, it is highly likely that state and local police department heads have been fully informed of their new legal authority given them by these new laws. If this possibility is true, then local and state police chiefs know their newly expanded powers, and if sufficiently angered, could possibly reach out to use these dictatorial power against the unfortunate victim.

The facts of this story seems like they might fit our suggested scenario. Please read carefully.


NEWS BRIEF: "Political Prisoner or Criminally Insane? Albany Woman Forcibly Injected With Drugs After Protesting Regulations of DMV", The Empire Journal, December 16, 2004, http://theempirejournal.com/albany_woman_forcibly_injected_w.htm

"Albany residents beware. What happened to Bliss Alexandra could happen to you. Anger police chief James Turley and you might end up at a state hospital for the violent and criminally insane, hundreds of miles away from your family and friends, forcibly injected with mind altering drugs. Bliss Alexandra who is also known as Darlene Early---or Darlene Barely as the Albany Police Department call her, was returned to Albany on Wednesday, Dec. 8 after completing an involuntary stay at Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center in Manhattan, ordered by Albany City Court judge Thomas Keefe after she exercised what she thought were her constitutional rights."

Let us stop right here to review what we have just learned. Instead of just having one official involved in this disaster, we have two: Albany, New York, Police Chief James Turley and Albany City Court Judge Thomas Keefe. This woman was incarcerated against her Constitutional rights because of combined action from both the Police Chief and the City Court Judge. Both the executive and judicial branches acted against this woman.

Since the Judicial Branch is charged with ensuring that the Executive Branch is adhering to the law, this situation seems to indicate that the actions of the Albany Police Chief were legal, i.e., a law actually exists which gives him the power to override Constitutional protections as we know them. Before we get into this aspect of the story, we need to go back to the article for more information. This next segment tells you how this whole situation unfolded. Prepare to be shocked.

"After Alexandra called the Albany Department of Public Safety to complain about her personal property being towed by police from a private driveway, Chief Turley responded by telling her he was either going to arrest her or have her removed to the Capital District Psychiatric Center. And that he did. Not only did he cause her arrest on three felony charges but caused her to be involuntarily committed with serial killers and rapists and subjected to the forced injection of antipsychotic drugs. Her alleged crime—exercising free speech on private property." (Ibid.)

Our guaranteed rights in the Constitution have always included both "free speech" and "private property". However, as we have repeatedly pointed out in the last 10 years, the Illuminati Plan foresees that both these Constitutionally guaranteed rights are planned for dissolution. Under the cover of a huge national crisis, these rights and all of our other rights, will be yanked from us all in a most unceremonial fashion.

Patriot Acts I and II have taken those rights away -- on paper. However, for the vast majority of American citizens, the actual enforcement of these new laws will await the final contrived crisis. But, for Bliss Alexandra, that law may have already been enforced. It is our contention that Bliss Alexandra may have been declared a "Domestic Terrorist" by the Police Chief and arrested on those grounds. As you shall see later, this designation as "Domestic Terrorist" specifically includes people who demand their rights under the Constitution. With this fact in mind, please read the next segment of this news article.

"Albany Police have charged Alexandra with three felony counts of second degree possession of a forged instrument but not only do the arrest reports and felony complaints allegedly contain false statements and information, but there appear to have been egregious violations of her constitutional rights as well as statutory law in her involuntary commitment and medication including an alleged falsified court order and denial of her right to counsel. Nagging questions exist about why and how she was removed from the Capital District area, her family, friends and legal counsel and sent to Kirby and the ensuing alleged rights violations. Perhaps her knowledge of the Constitution and the court system is exactly why she was arrested in the first place-------and her challenge of state’s Department of Motor Vehicles and what she claims is the state’s unconstitutional regulation of the right to travel .... Since her forced incarceration and hospitalization, Alexandra has now been evicted from her residence, although it is unclear if any eviction proceedings were legally conducted. " (Ibid.)

Now we are beginning to understand: Alexander called the New York State Motor Vehicle Department to complain that the car on her private property was unlawfully towed. In the ensuring conversation, she revealed a knowledge of her rights under the Constitution, as she argued her case. Suddenly, she received a phone call from a very unexpected source: the Albany Police Chief.

How did he threaten her? Going back to the first part of our quoted article, we read: "Chief Turley responded by telling her he was either going to arrest her or have her removed to the Capital District Psychiatric Center."

As a matter of fact, Chief Turley took both actions. Further, his arrest was backed by the actions of the Albany City Court judge.

Alexander suffered more loss of Constitutional protections. Listen:

"Alexandra didn’t call the police department again. Instead she filed a formal complaint with the Albany County District Attorney’s office against Turley the next day. A day later, on Aug. 26, she was arrested. But she wasn’t taken to CDPC, instead she was immediately incarcerated, arraigned on Aug. 27 on felony charges without legal counsel being present. On Aug. 30, as allowed by law, a friend attempted to file a writ of habeas corpus at the Albany City court clerk’s office and was not allowed to do so. Although state law requires that a preliminary hearing be held within 72 hours for a person incarcerated without bail to determine the sufficiency of the charges, no hearing was held." (Ibid.)

Are you beginning to get the concept, that Alexander was thoroughly and completely denied her normal rights as an American citizen?


 How could such a thing happen in this country? As we have earlier stated, Patriot Acts I and II allow this type of arrest and incarceration, and are now the law of the land. However, this personal rights erosion began to occur a number of years ago, as President Clinton began the process. Listen as we go back in time.

NEWS BRIEF: "YOU MIGHT BE A TERRORIST", by Brad Edmonds, LewRockwell.com, 11/15/01, http://www.rense.com/general16/youmightbe.htm

""H.R. 3162, 'The Patriot Bill', or the antiterrorism bill, might make you a terrorist ... the antiterrorism bill so loved by Congress and the White House has redefined terrorism [Predicted NEWS1553, 10/3/01]. According to Sec. 802, (a)(5)(B)(ii), "the term 'domestic terrorism' means activities that appear to be intended to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion." Again: If the activity appears to be intended to influence the policy of a government - not just the United States government - by intimidation, it's domestic terrorism. Most important: Since all we require is intimidation, how would we define that?"

Domestic Terrorism seems to be the codeword the government plans to use to justify the rounding up and persecution of patriots and Fundamental Christians. When you hear the FBI announce that a major terrorist attack was the work of "Domestic Terrorists", you may be sure that the time for the roundup of patriots and Fundamental Christians may be close. On October 3, 2001, we printed a warning that a major redefinition of what constitutes a "terrorist" was virtually inevitable. Oh, how we wish we had been wrong! This redefinition did not take long coming, but that still does not lessen the shock that it is here, written into law in the Patriot Bill.

Just for the record, before we get any further, Cutting Edge Ministries does NOT fit even this vague definition of a "Domestic Terrorist". From the beginning, we did not ever engage in any attempt to "influence the polices of a government". Period. If you have never attempted to influence governmental policy, then you are not guilty of either of the two means then listed, "intimidation" or "coercion".

Cutting Edge Ministries is strictly guided by Biblical doctrine and prophecy. We understand that the beginning point of End Times is the return of Israel back to her land [Matthew 24 and Joel 3:1]. Bible scholars have known for centuries that, only when Israel comes back to her ancient land as a nation can the End of the Age begin.

But, once Israel comes back -- and once the End of the Age begins -- the Bible teaches firmly that no one can stop the prophecies from being fulfilled and they must be fulfilled within the time frame Jesus set.


Now, let us get back to this feature article. We discover that a key word -- "Intimidation" -- in this new definition of "Domestic Terrorist" is not defined in the Patriot Act. Surprise! This lack of a firm and precise definition is the time-honored tool of the state propagandist. Listen as we quote again this piece of legislation:

" 'Intimidation' does not seem to be defined in H.R. 3162 ... while intimidation is a weak criterion, far too easy to establish in a court of law, you don't even have to establish anyone's intent to intimidate, much less his success at intimidating someone. You, the prosecutor, have to establish only the appearance of the intention to intimidate any government, and you can try anyone for domestic terrorism. So, those of us who disagree publicly with the government's responses to 9/11 - especially if our disagreements are reasoned, well-supported, and impassioned - are, by definition, terrorists. The only requirement is that someone, somewhere believes it appears we're trying to "intimidate" the government. This is an ominous glower over free speech." [Ibid.]

Truly, this information does cast a long ominous spectre over the American landscape, from sea to shining sea. This kind of vague definition can mean whatever government officials at the time want it to mean. Let us return to this feature article for one last tidbit of information.

"Remember that foreigners aren't alone - H.R. 3162 applies to everyone. Foreigners are singled out only in Bush's executive order. The only difference between foreigners and citizens is the option of the military tribunal." (Ibid.)

Believe me, this tiny bit of difference will mean next to nothing when the roundups of "Domestic Terrorists" begins. American citizens will be hauled to the secret civilian court, FISA, [Read NEWS1576 ] where proceedings will be secret also. Supposedly, this secret civilian court will function as do all secret courts. The name of the defendant will be secret; the charges will be secret; the witnesses will be secret; the evidence will be secret. With all this going for them, prosecutors of such secret courts have historically reached nearly 100% success rates of conviction!


Less than two years before Clinton left office, his FBI sent out flyers to all FBI offices nationwide, in which the subject of "Domestic Terrorism" was discussed. As the front of the flyer stated: "The FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force is attempting to identify criminal activities with domestic terrorists. In this regard, the purpose of this information sheet is to assist uniformed patrol officers in identifying potential domestic terrorism. Domestic terrorist is defined as: Groups or individuals entirely inside the US, attempting to influence the US government or population, to effect political or social change by engaging in criminal activity." [http://www.keepandbeararms.com/images/FBI-MCSOTerroristFlyer-Front.jpg]

Notice how quickly and vaguely the definition of terrorist is changed in this "Information Sheet". The one fact that immediately leapt out at me was that this definition did not include any actual destructive acts. My dictionary defines "terrorism" as: "The use of terror, violence, and intimidation to achieve an end, especially a political end." [Tormont Webster's Illustrated Encyclopedic Dictionary ].

Rather, the FBI re-defined terrorism as any group or individual who merely is engaged in "attempting to influence the US government or population"; further, these "influencing" activities constitute "criminal activity". Thus, by this definition, any Christian organization that attempts to "influence" the US government on issues such as Abortion is guilty of "Domestic Terrorism"! Any Christian who attempts to "influence the .... population" in any way, even just witnessing to them of Jesus Christ and His Plan of Salvation, is guilty of "Domestic Terrorism"!

Thus, such "influencing" activity is easily construed as "engaging in criminal activity"! Americans today are skating on the thinnest of ice and we are about to plunge through, many of us to our deaths. Every Executive Order that strips more rights of the individual "warms up the ice" even more, making it thinner each day.


Behold A Pale Horse
But, this FBI Information Sheet contains even more horror. When you turn to the back of the flyer, you read the specific types of "Domestic Terrorists". [http://www.keepandbeararms.com/images/FBI-MCSOTerroristFlyer-Back.jpg]

You will undoubtedly realize that you fall into one of these categories.

A). "Right-Wing Extremists -- defined as: 1) Defenders of US Constitution against Federal Government and the UN {Super Patriots}; 2) Groups or individuals engaged in para-military training." (Emphasis added)

Wow! Notice how this Definition #1 places both the Federal Government and the United Nations above the United States' Constitution! Even though all our officials consistently take oaths to "defend and uphold" the US Constitution, we can see they really loathe it, and are ready to declare anyone who dares defend the Constitution as a "Domestic Terrorist". President Bush has repeatedly told us that his Federal Government is "at war" against "Terrorism"; therefore, that must mean that the Federal Government considers itself to be at war against its own citizens, those conveniently redefined as "Domestic Terrorist".

New Age author Bill Cooper called this war the "silent war" -- government silently waging war on its own citizens! (Behold A Pale Horse)

B). "Left-Wing Terrorism -- Political motivation is usually Marxist/Leninist philosophy". Taking a page from Hitler's Nazi book, our government stokes the fires of Anti-Communism in this rule. Hitler gained much Right-Wing support simply and only because of his Anti-Communist stance.

The fact of the matter is that any extremist, from either side of the spectrum, is unwelcome.

C). "Hate Groups -- defined as: 1) Skinheads, Nazis, Neo-Nazis (usually recognized by tattoos); 2) Black Separatists; 3) KKK [Ku Klux Klan]; 4) Christian Identity; 5) White Nationalists"\

This definition of "Hate Group" does not include any Fundamental, Born Again Christians, for we fit none of these definitions. However, we are surely included in Right Wing Extremists and in a couple other categories; given the Politically Correct definition of "Hate Group", and considering that Fundamental Christian ministries have already been labeled as "Hate Groups", I can only assume it will not be too long for that label to be applied to us, as well.

D). "Common Law Movement Proponents -- defined as: 1) Fictitious license plates; 2) No license plates; 3) Fictitious driver's license; 4) Refuse to Identify Themselves; 5) Request Authority For Stop; 6) Make Numerous references to US Constitution; 7) Claim driving is a right, not a privilege; 8) Attempt to 'police the police'."

For those of you who are not familiar with Common Law Proponents, they refuse to recognize the authority of Federal and State governments. Thus, they may refuse to get a driver's license, or they may get a fake one; they may put a fictitious license plate on their vehicles or may drive their vehicles without any license. When stopped, they may refuse to identify themselves because they do not recognize the authority of the policeman who has stopped them. Such people are now "Domestic Terrorists".

However, I do take exception to Domestic Terrorist definitions 6 through 8. Americans have always had the inherent, guaranteed right to ensure that the person stopping them has the authority - the jurisdiction - to stop and question them. American citizens have always had the right to ensure that whatever action the police are taking is in accordance with the provisions of the US Constitution! Now, the tables are turned 180 degrees; whoever makes a reference to the US Constitution is a "Domestic Terrorist". If it were possible, our Founding Fathers would be turning over in their graves; no, it it were possible, they would be coming right out of the graves to mightily protest. The very Constitution they gave their lives, their honor, and their possessions for, is now being treated as toilet paper! Now, the very citizen they tried so hard to protect is a criminal -- a terrorist -- for even mentioning the US Constitution when they are stopped and questioned.

Americans have always used the US Constitution to "police the police", and for good historic reason. Whenever the police are no longer restrained by a document like the Constitution, they are soon wreaking terror amongst the people. History is replete with example after example after example. Our Founding Fathers were sick and tired of the King's police barging into homes, rifling through drawers, arresting at the drop of a hat, and throwing people into the worst of the prisons imaginable, to await a fate of either a long prison term, or death. Now, our precious Constitution is being trashed by the FBI, and no one seems to know or care.

"Claiming driving is a right, not a privilege" should read, "Claiming freedom of movement is a right, not a privilege". Our Founding Fathers realized that personal freedom necessitated freedom of movement, among other things. To understand how important this freedom is, just go to Communist China as I did a few years back. Even though we were on a tour bus officially recognized by the Communist Government, the bus had to stop at a roadblock every ten miles; this roadblock was military, and a soldier fully armed entered the bus to examine the papers of the driver; he could challenge at will the papers of any individual. At any point along the way, the bus could have been turned back, and probably could have been impounded. We Americans take our freedom of travel -- by whatever means -- for granted. Soon, we shall have this right taken away, under the ruse of fighting a "terrorist" crisis, I am sure.

Bliss Alexander's behavior fit this description of "Common Law Movement Proponents ". She made numerous references to her Constitutional rights, she displayed a fictitious license plate, and she questioned the authority of the police for towing that car off her private property. According to this definition, Alexander was most definitely redefined from lawful, patriotic American citizen to "Domestic Terrorist".

We then can more readily understand why she was arrested and so treated -- and it is now all legal thanks to the Patriot Act.

E). "Single Issue Terrorists -- defined as: 1) Targeting of law enforcement and emergency personnel; 2) Animal Rights; 3) Eco-Terrorism; 4) Violent anti-abortion extremism; 5) Urban riot agitators; 6) Cyber penetration; 7) Non-Aligned Terrorists; 8) Doomsday Cult-Type Group; 9) Insurgents/Rebels; 10) Lone Individuals."

Now, which kind of person in America today would NOT fit into one of these extremely vague and broadly based groups? While most Christians would not fall into categories 1 through 6, categories 7, 8, and 10 might be redefined well enough to include us. Take Category #7 for example: the entire definition hinges on the word, "non-aligned". Since Cutting Edge Ministries is not "aligned" with any particular church, does that make us "Non-Aligned" terrorist?

Or, how about #8 -- Doomsday Cult-Type Group: while this definition specifically refers to a David Koresh type of cult group, I remember well President Clinton saying -- just a couple days after Waco -- that, "perhaps we need to look at anyone who literally believes in the Book of Revelation". I am convinced this is the case in this definition. Time will demonstrate that Fundamental Christians who literally believe -- and teach -- the Book of Revelation and all of the rest of revealed Biblical prophecy, have already been designated as "Doomsday".

Category #10 is laughable. I know of a number of "lone individuals" who just want to live in peace and be left alone. These individuals just want to opt out of society. Some of them own farms outside town, have some guns for amusement and hunting, and are simply reclusive. Now, we see that the Federal Government has classified them as a "Domestic Terrorist". Maybe the government just does not want anyone who does not feel a need for it, or any of its "programs".

Now, I can just hear some of you saying to yourself, that this FBI flyer was written and distributed by the Janet Reno Justice Department under the reign of President Clinton; therefore, there is no evidence that either Bush or Ashcroft believe in these ridiculous redefinitions of what constitutes "Domestic Terrorists".

Were it not for the story that follows, I would be hard pressed to disagree with you. But, this very true news story occurred on November 1, 2001, under the government of Bush and the FBI of Ashcroft; further, this story reveals that the FBI has already gone to the logical conclusion of this terrorist redefinition: flagging the whereabouts and the movements of individuals that fall into one or more of these FBI categories, and restricting their freedom of movement.


When you add to this volatile mix the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court has just ruled that police do not have to give a reason for an arrest, you can appreciate how thin the ice is upon which we are skating! Let us briefly review this most recent Supreme Court ruling.

NEWS BRIEF: "Police No Longer Need Say Why Arrests Are Made", Bloomberg News Service, 12-15-4

"Police officers don't have to give a reason at the time they arrest someone, the U.S. Supreme Court said in a ruling that shields officers from false-arrest lawsuits.
The justices, voting 8-0, threw out a suit against Washington state police officers who stopped a motorist and then told him he was being arrested for tape-recording their conversation. Although the recording was legal, the high court said the arrest was valid because the man could have been arrested instead for impersonating a police officer. In an opinion for the court, Justice Antonin Scalia said the officers didn't have to provide a reason for arresting the man at all, as long as they had probable cause to do so."

Stop right here. Did you realize that "Conservative" darling, Justice Antonin Scalia, not only voted to establish this dictatorial precedent, but he wrote the Majority Opinion! This sorry state of affairs just goes to prove what we have been saying for years, i.e., labels are totally meaningless, for they obscure truth rather than revealing it. Scalia was nominated by "Conservative" President Ronald Reagan on September 25, 1986 (OYEA U.S. Supreme Court Multimedia). Scalia has been counted on by many genuine Conservatives to help stem the tide of Big Brother encroachment. Yet, here, we see him siding with the Majority in one of the worst erosions of personal liberty ever.


Now we can be reasonably sure that Bliss Alexander was arrested and incarcerated because she undertook activities which law authorities construed as "intimidation", thus making her a "Domestic Terrorist".

Keep your ears attuned to the news. When you hear the words, "Domestic Terror" or "Domestic Terrorist", you will know exactly what is occurring and why. America is apparently now at the point where our local, state and federal law enforcement leadership has been fully informed of their new power according to the Patriot Act. Even though the vast majority of citizenry is not to be tipped off as to the New Order of these legal proceedings, "lone wolf" people can easily be picked up and treated in such a manner as the new, dictatorial legislation will allow. Most people will shrug their shoulders when told that a citizen has been treated in such a manner as to have their Constitutional rights stripped from them, because that is not happening to them -- yet.

With our personal liberties declining so precipitously, along with so many key prophecies being fulfilled in our Daily News, the discerning person can only realize that the End of the Age is rushing down upon us. Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.

If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.

If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.

We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.

Finally, we would love to hear from you.

You can contact us by mail or email.

God bless you.

Copyright © 2004 Cutting Edge Ministries. All rights reserved. This password protected article and its contents are protected under the copyright laws of the United States and other countries. This article is provided by subscription only for use by the subscriber and all other rights are expressly reserved by the copyright owner. Copying and pasting this article, in whole or in part, into e-mails or as attachments to e-mails or posting it on the Internet is strictly prohibited and may subject the offender to civil liability and severe criminal penalties (Title 17, United States Code, section 501 and 506).

Copying and distributing this article in violation of the above notice is also a violation of God's moral law.

Become a Headline news subscriber HERE.

Subscribe to our free email updates and messages from our editor by entering your email address below :
Return to: