Title: Why Liberals Should Love The Second Amendment Which Guarantees Our Right To Own Guns
Resources to aid your Understanding
Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!
Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.
YOU ARE NOW ON
THE CUTTING EDGE
Copyright © 2010 Cutting Edge Ministries. All rights reserved. See full copyright notice below.
Liberals are always so quick to demand Constitutional rights for themselves, even if it means denying it from others. They always want "freedom of speech" for themselves, even if it means denying it from some other group. They always want freedom to pursue the religion they want to practice (even one considered deviant by the larger population), even if it means denying some other class of citizens their right to worship the way they feel their conscience is guiding them.
But, in the area of our Constitutional right to own and carry gun, Liberals want the strictest gun controls possible -- again even if it means overriding the strong contrary opinion of the majority of the American people.
As you will see, this position is completely crazy, at odds with normal crime statistics and nationwide control of the population at one of the most important times of transition in American history -- the time when our Constitutional Government is planned to be overthrown so the most bloody, most absolute of all dictatorships in our entire history is going to be established.
Let us now examine our featured editorial so that we can see the point of view from which this commentator is coming.
NEWS BRIEF: "Why liberals should love the Second Amendment ", by Kaili Joy Gray, Daily Kos, July 4, 2010
"Liberals love the Constitution."
"Ask anyone on the street. They'll tell you the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a liberal organization. During the dark days of the Bush Administration, membership doubled because so many Americans feared increasing restrictions on their civil liberties. If you were to ask liberals to list their top five complaints about the Bush Administration, and they would invariably say the words 'shredding' and 'Constitution' in the same sentence. They might also add "Fourth Amendment" and 'due process'. It's possible they'll talk about 'free speech zones' and 'habeas corpus'."
I have always had this trouble with the American Civil Liberties Union. They always seemed interested in using our Constitutional liberties in order to destroy our freedoms and our Constitutional liberties and they always seemed bent toward Communism / Socialism.
But, I suppose that I should not be surprised, since the founder of the ACLU loved the Communist system and its ideological founder, Karl Marx. Listen to Berit Kjos explain:
"Remember, the First Amendment assures us that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech...' Though intended to protect faithful believers, that assurance has been turned upside down. No organization has done more to twist that promise into a ban on faith-based expressions than the ACLU. Small wonder, since its founder, Roger Baldwin, despised Christianity. 'Communism is the goal', he wrote in 1935, aligning its ideology with Karl Marx' war on Biblical Truth." (Berit Kjos, "Faith-Based Partnerships Ban Truth & Freedom", February 9, 2009)
The ACLU has always had this twisted view of the American Constitution. They continually use our freedoms against us. For example, they have consistently used our Freedom of Religion as a weapon against the Christian, forcing deviant religions upon this nation and forcing us to give up many cherished practices, like praying in public schools and in public arenas. When Jesus holds His White Throne Judgment, He will pronounce severe eternal punishment upon the founder and the members of the ACLU for the way in which they "called good evil and evil good".
But, the author of this editorial does have the point that Liberals love certain parts of the Constitution. They just hate the gun ownership provisions of the Second Amendment.
"Liberals can quote legal precedent, news reports, and exhaustive studies. They can talk about the intentions of the Founders. They can argue at length against the tyranny of the government. And they will, almost without exception, conclude the necessity of respecting, and not restricting, civil liberties."
"Except for one: the right to keep and bear arms. When it comes to discussing the Second Amendment, liberals check rational thought at the door. They dismiss approximately 40% of American households that own one or more guns, and those who fight to protect the Second Amendment, as "gun nuts." They argue for greater restrictions. And they pursue these policies at the risk of alienating voters who might otherwise vote for Democrats. And they do so in a way that is wholly inconsistent with their approach to all of our other civil liberties."
The average Liberal does "check rational thought at the door". In fact, they dismiss any pertinent facts which show their gun control mindset to be wrong -- and even dangerous to our entire way of life. Have they never read the foundational truth about Gun Control, that the more the average citizen is armed in any particular town or city, the less crime these citizens have to deal with on a daily basis.
Have you heard this truth?
In Liberal mind, the gun issue is this: "Access = Crime". Of course, this proposition is stupidly wrong! A gun is an inanimate object, and can be used for good purposes or evil, depending entirely upon the person wielding the gun. John R. Lott, Jr., writing in his book, "More Guns, Less Crime" showers the reader with statistics that demonstrate that, when people in a community have the right to bear concealed arms, the crime rate in that community drops in huge double digits, sometimes over 75%! You see, criminals want to steal but most definitely do not want to die in the process. Therefore, they will steer wide and clear from a community in which its citizens have the right to legally bear concealed weapons.
In Providence, R.I., on July, 1999, an elderly man shot an intruder who was going to burglarize his apartment, seriously wounding the intruder. Police issued a statement that this shooting was in self-defense, and perfectly within the law.
I submit to you that, in any of the shootings that have so horrified this country in the past two decades, had anyone on the scene possessed a weapon, the outcome would have been far different. In fact, if the shooters knew they would likely be encountering "victims" who were armed, they would probably have not attacked in the first place. But, if they did attack anyway, their shooting would likely have been met with shooting from one or more civilians who were in the line of fire, and returning the fire. Most likely, the death toll would have been far less.
Therefore, the real statement people should be making is something like this: "Shooters find it far too easy to wound and kill civilians; we need to make it harder for shooters to fire their weapons with impunity." Most police departments are in favor of arming civilians, because they know their men cannot be everywhere at once, and most assuredly can not provide individual security for the population.
Let us listen to John Lott describe a situation where gunmen firing on innocent civilians were surprised by some of their intended victims firing back!
"Other examples suggest that more than just common crimes may be prevented by law-abiding citizens carrying concealed handguns. Referring to the July, 1984, massacre at a San Ysidro, California, McDonalds restaurant, Israeli criminologist Abraham Tennenbaum described what occurred at a crowded venue in Jerusalem some weeks before the Californian McDonald's massacre: three terrorists who attempted to machine-gun the throng managed to kill only one victim before being shot down by handgun-carrying Israelis. Presented to the press the next day, the surviving terrorist complained that his group had not realized that Israeli civilians were armed . The terrorists had planned to machine-gun a succession of crowd spots, thinking that they would be able to escape before the police or army could arrive to deal with them." [Lott, "More Guns, Less Crime", p. 6; Emphasis added]
Obviously, the fact that Israeli civilians were carrying concealed weapons, and immediately used them, prevented an even larger death toll. Had these gunmen encountered only unarmed civilians they might have been able to kill 50 or more people! How big would the outcry been then? But, no one in any Liberal Media ever reported this story from the aspect that the possession of guns had prevented a huge tragedy.
John Lott makes a very good observation: "Yet just because a law is passed to ban guns, it does not automatically follow that the total number of deaths will decline. Given the large stock of guns in the country, and given the difficulties the government faces in preventing other illegal items, such as drugs, from entering the country, it is not clear how successful the government would be in eliminating most guns."
Everyone who supports the modification or elimination of our Second Amendment of the Constitution is placing a huge -- and unwarranted -- faith in the Federal and State Governments to be able to enforce the new laws in such a way as to simultaneously disarm the criminal while offering individual protection to citizens that will now most assuredly be disarmed. Most police departments will admit -- privately at least -- that they cannot ever offer this kind of individual protection. Yet, criminals will know for sure that 100% of their victims will be disarmed.
Lott again states the problem a little more clearly. "This raises the important question of whether the law would primarily reduce the number of guns held by law-abiding citizens. How would such a law alter the relative balance of power between criminals and law-abiding citizens? Suppose it were possible to remove all guns. Other questions would arise. Would successfully removing guns discourage murders and other crimes because criminals would find knives and clubs poor alternatives? Would it be easier for criminals to prey on the weakest citizens, who would find it more difficult to defend themselves?"
Of course, we know the answer to that question, don't we? We know that the weakest, most vulnerable citizens would be the ones who would suffer the most if all guns were confiscated. How important is the gun in today's American society, in defensive situations? Lott estimates that guns are defensively used at least 760,000 times per year, and maybe as many as 3.6 million times [Ibid., p. 11]
The difficulty in obtaining accurate figures lies in two areas: 1) Most of defensive gun usage every year is simply showing the gun to a potential robber or assailant forcing them to flee; and 2) Most police departments do not record these defensive instances, because no law was broken -- the robber had no chance to rob and the murderer had no chance to murder. And, because the potential victim only had to wave the gun at the assailant, he or she had no need to explain anything to the police.
Therefore, if the Federal Government were to confiscate all guns, we just might see an increase of 3.6 million serious crimes every year. Every year, more little old ladies, elderly men, and men and women up and down the age spectrum will be more in danger of assault, robbery, and murder.
And, do you know something? Officials in our Federal and State governments know this, also. Then, why you ask, are they Hell-bent for gun confiscation?
History records that every single dictatorial government in history has disarmed the public , and then has gone to great lengths to keep them disarmed. Since the coming New World Order is planned to be the most dictatorial in all history, we should expect they would desperately want to disarm the American people first. I believe it highly likely our officials will wait until after the Rapture of the Church . They know that tens of millions of Born Again Christians world wide are also gun owners.
After the Rapture has taken these Christians out, their guns will simply be there for the taking. Further, since current laws have been requiring gun purchasers to fill out forms in which they list their address, government authorities will know exactly which address contains which guns, and how many guns that will be at each address. Now, you know the REAL reason for gun registration!
As I read this poll, that a majority of Americans [52%] now support modifying or eliminating the Second Amendment of our precious Constitution, I really and truly got a sense of how close we are to the End of the Age! The words of a New Age author ring in my ears:
"The Christ cannot appear until and unless a substantial minority of people have been conditioned to accept him."
A majority of Americans have been pre-conditioned in this critical matter of gun ownership and of amending the Constitution. We are really getting close.
Illuminati Card Game
Have you heard of this Illuminati Card Game and do you know its tremendous significance in understanding the meaning it holds for anyone who wants to properly understand the significance of what is occurring in our world today?
In 1990, role-playing inventor, Steve Jackson, was planning his newest game, which he would ultimately call the "Illuminati -- New World Order" Game, or "INWO" for short. Jackson was creating a game that would hit very, very close to home, very close to the actual plan of the Illuminati to propel the world into the New World Order -- also known as the Kingdom of Antichrist.
In 1991, the first former Satanist who worked with me told me an extremely shocking fact. He said, "David a person could read 1,000 New Age books and not understand the New World Order Plan and how they are going to stage Antichrist on the world scene. But, a person could read the right 10 books and understand the Plan perfectly. I would like to show you these 10 books and study them with you in great detail."
I studied these 10 books with him for about 3 years. In that time frame, two new books came out which he considered to be important enough to study, so we took the time to read and study these two new books. The titles of these two additional books are:
"The Keys To This Blood", by Malachi Martin
"Behold A Pale Horse", by Bill Cooper
We carry "Behold A Pale Horse" in our Bookstore and recommend it highly to you. This book is one of the most quoted in our nearly 1,200 articles.
In working with this former member of the House of Theosophy, I soon understand a most important fact: in the realm of the Occult, members understand the New World Order Plan very, very well. With this thought in mind, let us return to Steve Jackson of Jackson Games.
How did Steve Jackson know the Illuminati Plan so precisely? His company produced role-playing games in the genre of "Dungeons and Dragons". Another former Satanist, Doc Marquis, had this to say about "Dungeons and Dragons" -- after a person has risen to the top ranks of D&D, he/she only has to be directly inducted into a Satanic coven. They do not need to learn anything from a coven master before joining, because they have learned the same Satanism from D&D."
Therefore, as the owner of the company producing D&D type role-playing games, Steve Jackson knew the Illuminati Plan well.
Each card of this Illuminati Card Game represented an action the Illuminati is going to take to overthrow this present civilization -- known as the "Old World Order" to the New World Order can be instituted. We encourage you to read NEWS1753, to see how accurately this Illuminati Card Game predicted the attacks on 9/11!
These cards because they significantly tell the story of the Illuminati to produce the wars, the panics, the epidemics needed to produce Antichrist. This game was in the beginning stages in 1990 and was finally published in 1995, becoming a best seller. As Steve Jackson says on his website: "In 1994, he reworked the old faithful Illuminati to jump on the trading-card bandwagon. INWO (Illuminati: New World Order) became the company's biggest hit yet, and its first million-dollar ship." In fact, the "INWO" won the 1995 Origins Award for Best Card Game."
Now, what does Steve Jackson have to say about Gun Control?
His cards depict Mass Murder first and then Gun Control.
We show the Mass Murder card, above, in the related items section. Now, let us examine his Gun Control card.
The bottom of this playing card reads: "Increase the Power of all Violent Government Groups by 3. Increase the Power of all Criminal Groups by 1."
Steve Jackson is quietly communicating a very important factor. Gun Control has historically made it much easier for a government to become more violent in the manner in which it treats its citizens; in fact, the first action a new dictatorship takes is to seize all guns from the people. Lenin and Hitler both seized individual weapons under the same false premise that they were making their citizens "more safe"; the reality was that they made their citizens more susceptible to a severe dictatorship. New Age author, Bill Cooper, has some very pertinent things to say on this issue:
"The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms. Using drugs and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called Orion, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on school yards and thus inflame the antigun lobby ... The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment. Author's Note: I have found that these events have, indeed, happened all over the country. In every instance that I have investigated -- the incident at the women's school in Canada, the shopping center incident in Canada, the Stockton, California, massacre, and the murder of Rabbi Meir Kahane -- the shooters were all ex-mental patients or were current mental patients who were ALL ON THE DRUG PROZAC! This drug, when taken in certain doses, increases the serotonin level in the patient, causing extreme violence. Couple that with a post-hypnotic suggestion or control through an electronic brain implant, or microwave or E.L.F. intrusion, and you get mass murder, ending in every case with the suicide of the perpetrator." ["Beyond A Pale Horse", p. 225; Emphasis was in the original]
Of course, whenever a government successfully removes guns from their citizens, an Absolute Dictatorship always follows. Therefore, we should expect that the efforts of Liberals to remove our guns from our hands will lead to an Absolute Dictatorship. Does the Illuminati include a Dictatorship in their plans for the coming New World Order?
You bet they do!
United States of America Constitution, Amendment #2, passed 1791.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Our forefathers had lived a lifetime fighting the oppression of the British monarchy. Furthermore, they were all very familiar with the history of British repression in the previous 200 years. As they considered a way in which to guarantee future Americans their continued freedoms, they felt they could pass no better Constitutional guarantee than the Right To Bear Arms . They felt that, if Americans could own guns and own as many guns as they desired, this collective gun ownership would be a huge stumbling block in the path of any leader desiring to set up a dictatorship.
Therefore, they carefully constructed the clearest, most unambiguous statement possible in the English language. In phrase #1, they stated the reason for this amendment: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state". This militia mentioned here is not the standing army of the Federal Government, but a National Guard type of informal militia. The Founders of the United States strongly believed that the common citizen needed to be able to own and to bear arms in his own defense. The second phrase naturally follows the logic of the first: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
No fancy arguments, or any legalese, can hide the plain intent of our Founding Fathers in owning weapons. Notice that our Founding Fathers used the word, "infringed" here. This is an interesting choice of words, because it is far more limiting than the word, 'outlawed'. Not only is the Federal Government forbidden to outlaw the ownership of guns, they cannot even pass laws that "infringe" upon this right! In this regard, the laws requiring potential owners to register their guns, and to pass any laws requiring a background check before being able to buy a gun, are probably illegal. In fact, all these laws requiring registration are intended to do is to inform the Federal Government which of the law-abiding citizens own guns, so they will know which houses to target during the planned take-over of all guns.
No matter how you might personally feel about the Gun Control issue, you should realize that every dictatorship ever in world history moved to remove guns and other weapons from the people! Since the New World Order is going to be the most repressive dictatorship in world history, we are not surprised to see their spokesmen so adamant about removing guns from all private citizens.
As we begin our study, be aware that every single dictatorship in the history of the world disarmed the common people. Further, such dictatorships forbade the creation of a common citizen's militia, realizing such a para-military force could be a formidable fighting force that could prevent severe repression. Since the advent of modern weaponry, Twentieth Century dictators have seized all guns and have forbade the purchase of new guns. Whether you are talking about the Leftist Communist dictatorships, or the Right-wing Nazi dictatorship of Adolf Hitler, these tyrants seized guns and forbade the purchase of new ones.
Dictators know they cannot survive a well-armed citizenry . The New World Order will be history's most repressive dictatorship; they know they cannot even get it established if the people own guns, and they know they cannot carry out their most severe plans of population control and elimination if people own guns. For the longest time, I felt that the modern weaponry of today rendered this Second Amendment obsolete. I no longer feel this way. Now, I realize that even a well-armed modern military force faces an almost impossible task of uprooting several tens of millions of patriots armed with over one hundred million weapons. Such a task would mean fighting house to house, door to door, and would result in the casualties of too many millions of soldiers of the New World Order United Nations forces.
Therefore, the assault on weapon ownership must take place on a more indirect and subtle level. Individual Americans must be brought to the point where they want guns taken from fellow American citizens. If the majority of Americans could be brought to the point where they would demand their fellow Americans turn over their weapons to authorities, that would be much better.
Cannot Forget The Lesson From Hitler's Germany
Will the Liberals win this fight and convince the vast majority of American citizens that they must voluntarily give up their guns? German citizens during the decade of the 1930's listened to their new leader, Adolf Hitler, when he urged them to give up their own guns, promising them that the police could better protect them.
Hitler was surprisingly successful in persuading his people to give up their arms.
Within months of the huge, nation-wide surrender of privately-owned weapons to authorities, Hitler plunged Germany into his Absolute Dictatorship. Not only were German citizens thrown into dictatorship, but World War III beckoned from just "over the horizon".
Today, not only is the Illuminati in America following the Hitler plan, but this dynamic book (shown left) contains the German language original of the Nazi Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, a page-by-page translation, and then a page-by-page comparison with the U.S. Gun Control Act of 1968. The similarities are striking. The book also contains an actual copy of the correspondence between the U.S. bill's sponsor, Sen. Thomas Dodd, and the Library of Congress which translated the Nazi law for him."
Gun Control has been advocated by Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, thus revealing to us that this plan goes beyond party boundaries, making this goal a global Illuminati one -- just as the Illuminati Card Game reveals.
All Liberals must understand these realities and stop their efforts to give authorities the power to remove guns from the people. In my opinion, the very fact that Americans own about 200 million guns has slowed the advent of the New World Order dramatically.
Are you spiritually ready for the Satanic New World Order? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.
If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.
If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.
If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.
We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.
Finally, we would love to hear from you.
You can contact us by mail or email.
God bless you.
Copyright © 2010 Cutting Edge Ministries. All rights reserved. This password protected article and its contents are protected under the copyright laws of the United States and other countries. This article is provided by subscription only for use by the subscriber and all other rights are expressly reserved by the copyright owner. Copying and pasting this article, in whole or in part, into e-mails or as attachments to e-mails or posting it on the Internet is strictly prohibited and may subject the offender to civil liability and severe criminal penalties (Title 17, United States Code, section 501 and 506).
Copying and distributing
this article in violation of the above notice is also a violation of God's moral
Become a Headline news subscriber HERE.
Subscribe to our free email updates and messages from our editor by entering your email address below :Return to: